Loading…

Influence of stochastic adhesive porosity and material variability on failure behavior of adhesively bonded composite sandwich joints

Progressive damage analysis (PDA) is used to explain experimentally observed differences in failure modes and levels of strength in sandwich panels joined with double lap adhesively bonded joints (ABJ). Experimental data indicates that nominally identical ABJ failed in different failure modes, inclu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Composite structures 2023-02, Vol.306, p.116608, Article 116608
Main Authors: Larson, Richard, Bergan, Andrew, Leone, Frank, Kravchenko, Oleksandr G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-745c5bd0e4acb3e14b64273a6032952c7f7c1570b2435bbf13ac55e4203ce1be3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-745c5bd0e4acb3e14b64273a6032952c7f7c1570b2435bbf13ac55e4203ce1be3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 116608
container_title Composite structures
container_volume 306
creator Larson, Richard
Bergan, Andrew
Leone, Frank
Kravchenko, Oleksandr G.
description Progressive damage analysis (PDA) is used to explain experimentally observed differences in failure modes and levels of strength in sandwich panels joined with double lap adhesively bonded joints (ABJ). Experimental data indicates that nominally identical ABJ failed in different failure modes, including facesheet delamination, and a combination of facesheet delamination and doubler net section failure, with joint strengths ranging from 26.8 MPa to 33.3 MPa. A finite element model for the ABJ considers different possible failure modes in the multidirectional facesheet, woven doubler, honeycomb core, and adhesive. PDA predictions by a pristine model agree with the average experimental peak load, strain in the joint, and post-mortem damage states. Material defects are incorporated into an ABJ model that includes simulation of pre-existing matrix damage, local adhesive porosity, and uniform modification of adhesive properties. Analysis of the defect effects suggests existence of structure–property relationships that explain variability in ABJ behavior observed experimentally.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116608
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compstruct_2022_116608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S026382232201340X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S026382232201340X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-745c5bd0e4acb3e14b64273a6032952c7f7c1570b2435bbf13ac55e4203ce1be3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD_6BFD_iJF1CxaNSJTawtuzJRHGUxpXtBvUD-G8SFcSS1Sxm7tGdQwjlbMUZL-67Ffj9IaZwhLQSTIgV50XBqguy4FW5zjir1CVZMFHIrBJCXpObGDvGWJVzviBf26HpjzgAUt_QmDy0JiYH1NQtRjciPfjgo0snaoaa7k3C4ExPRzMN6_p54QfaGNcfA1KLrRmdDzPsl9CfqPVDjTWdm84spHGCfTpoaefdkOItuWpMH_HuZy7Jx_PT--Y12729bDcPuwxkUaWszBUoWzPMDViJPLdFLkppCibFWgkomxK4KpkVuVTWNlwaUApzwSQgtyiXpDpzYfopBmz0Ibi9CSfNmZ516k7_6dSzTn3WOUUfz1Gc-o0Og47gZm-1Czjd1t79D_kGbEiIJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of stochastic adhesive porosity and material variability on failure behavior of adhesively bonded composite sandwich joints</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Larson, Richard ; Bergan, Andrew ; Leone, Frank ; Kravchenko, Oleksandr G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Larson, Richard ; Bergan, Andrew ; Leone, Frank ; Kravchenko, Oleksandr G.</creatorcontrib><description>Progressive damage analysis (PDA) is used to explain experimentally observed differences in failure modes and levels of strength in sandwich panels joined with double lap adhesively bonded joints (ABJ). Experimental data indicates that nominally identical ABJ failed in different failure modes, including facesheet delamination, and a combination of facesheet delamination and doubler net section failure, with joint strengths ranging from 26.8 MPa to 33.3 MPa. A finite element model for the ABJ considers different possible failure modes in the multidirectional facesheet, woven doubler, honeycomb core, and adhesive. PDA predictions by a pristine model agree with the average experimental peak load, strain in the joint, and post-mortem damage states. Material defects are incorporated into an ABJ model that includes simulation of pre-existing matrix damage, local adhesive porosity, and uniform modification of adhesive properties. Analysis of the defect effects suggests existence of structure–property relationships that explain variability in ABJ behavior observed experimentally.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-8223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116608</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adhesively bonded joints ; Manufacturing defects ; Progressive damage modeling</subject><ispartof>Composite structures, 2023-02, Vol.306, p.116608, Article 116608</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-745c5bd0e4acb3e14b64273a6032952c7f7c1570b2435bbf13ac55e4203ce1be3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-745c5bd0e4acb3e14b64273a6032952c7f7c1570b2435bbf13ac55e4203ce1be3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Larson, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergan, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leone, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kravchenko, Oleksandr G.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of stochastic adhesive porosity and material variability on failure behavior of adhesively bonded composite sandwich joints</title><title>Composite structures</title><description>Progressive damage analysis (PDA) is used to explain experimentally observed differences in failure modes and levels of strength in sandwich panels joined with double lap adhesively bonded joints (ABJ). Experimental data indicates that nominally identical ABJ failed in different failure modes, including facesheet delamination, and a combination of facesheet delamination and doubler net section failure, with joint strengths ranging from 26.8 MPa to 33.3 MPa. A finite element model for the ABJ considers different possible failure modes in the multidirectional facesheet, woven doubler, honeycomb core, and adhesive. PDA predictions by a pristine model agree with the average experimental peak load, strain in the joint, and post-mortem damage states. Material defects are incorporated into an ABJ model that includes simulation of pre-existing matrix damage, local adhesive porosity, and uniform modification of adhesive properties. Analysis of the defect effects suggests existence of structure–property relationships that explain variability in ABJ behavior observed experimentally.</description><subject>Adhesively bonded joints</subject><subject>Manufacturing defects</subject><subject>Progressive damage modeling</subject><issn>0263-8223</issn><issn>1879-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD_6BFD_iJF1CxaNSJTawtuzJRHGUxpXtBvUD-G8SFcSS1Sxm7tGdQwjlbMUZL-67Ffj9IaZwhLQSTIgV50XBqguy4FW5zjir1CVZMFHIrBJCXpObGDvGWJVzviBf26HpjzgAUt_QmDy0JiYH1NQtRjciPfjgo0snaoaa7k3C4ExPRzMN6_p54QfaGNcfA1KLrRmdDzPsl9CfqPVDjTWdm84spHGCfTpoaefdkOItuWpMH_HuZy7Jx_PT--Y12729bDcPuwxkUaWszBUoWzPMDViJPLdFLkppCibFWgkomxK4KpkVuVTWNlwaUApzwSQgtyiXpDpzYfopBmz0Ibi9CSfNmZ516k7_6dSzTn3WOUUfz1Gc-o0Og47gZm-1Czjd1t79D_kGbEiIJw</recordid><startdate>20230215</startdate><enddate>20230215</enddate><creator>Larson, Richard</creator><creator>Bergan, Andrew</creator><creator>Leone, Frank</creator><creator>Kravchenko, Oleksandr G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230215</creationdate><title>Influence of stochastic adhesive porosity and material variability on failure behavior of adhesively bonded composite sandwich joints</title><author>Larson, Richard ; Bergan, Andrew ; Leone, Frank ; Kravchenko, Oleksandr G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-745c5bd0e4acb3e14b64273a6032952c7f7c1570b2435bbf13ac55e4203ce1be3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adhesively bonded joints</topic><topic>Manufacturing defects</topic><topic>Progressive damage modeling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Larson, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergan, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leone, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kravchenko, Oleksandr G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Composite structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Larson, Richard</au><au>Bergan, Andrew</au><au>Leone, Frank</au><au>Kravchenko, Oleksandr G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of stochastic adhesive porosity and material variability on failure behavior of adhesively bonded composite sandwich joints</atitle><jtitle>Composite structures</jtitle><date>2023-02-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>306</volume><spage>116608</spage><pages>116608-</pages><artnum>116608</artnum><issn>0263-8223</issn><eissn>1879-1085</eissn><abstract>Progressive damage analysis (PDA) is used to explain experimentally observed differences in failure modes and levels of strength in sandwich panels joined with double lap adhesively bonded joints (ABJ). Experimental data indicates that nominally identical ABJ failed in different failure modes, including facesheet delamination, and a combination of facesheet delamination and doubler net section failure, with joint strengths ranging from 26.8 MPa to 33.3 MPa. A finite element model for the ABJ considers different possible failure modes in the multidirectional facesheet, woven doubler, honeycomb core, and adhesive. PDA predictions by a pristine model agree with the average experimental peak load, strain in the joint, and post-mortem damage states. Material defects are incorporated into an ABJ model that includes simulation of pre-existing matrix damage, local adhesive porosity, and uniform modification of adhesive properties. Analysis of the defect effects suggests existence of structure–property relationships that explain variability in ABJ behavior observed experimentally.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116608</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0263-8223
ispartof Composite structures, 2023-02, Vol.306, p.116608, Article 116608
issn 0263-8223
1879-1085
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compstruct_2022_116608
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adhesively bonded joints
Manufacturing defects
Progressive damage modeling
title Influence of stochastic adhesive porosity and material variability on failure behavior of adhesively bonded composite sandwich joints
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A51%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20stochastic%20adhesive%20porosity%20and%20material%20variability%20on%20failure%20behavior%20of%20adhesively%20bonded%20composite%20sandwich%20joints&rft.jtitle=Composite%20structures&rft.au=Larson,%20Richard&rft.date=2023-02-15&rft.volume=306&rft.spage=116608&rft.pages=116608-&rft.artnum=116608&rft.issn=0263-8223&rft.eissn=1879-1085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116608&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES026382232201340X%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-745c5bd0e4acb3e14b64273a6032952c7f7c1570b2435bbf13ac55e4203ce1be3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true