Loading…

Research on the adhesion mechanism and compatibility of acrylate composite polyurethane binder − aggregate based on surface free energy theory

The raw materials selection and design of waterproof polymer concrete for steel bridge deck paving lack clarity regarding the adhesion mechanism and optimal compatibility between acrylate composite polyurethane binder (APUB) and various aggregates. This study systematically investigates these issues...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Construction & building materials 2024-08, Vol.438, p.137236, Article 137236
Main Authors: Duan, Shaochan, Cui, Jingxian, Hu, Jianying, Han, Tao, Chen, Yan, Wang, Hongyu, Ma, Tao
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-e15687c6feb59f39c120f2267e994cf0424e244a246029a18399c1ee770bb28a3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 137236
container_title Construction & building materials
container_volume 438
creator Duan, Shaochan
Cui, Jingxian
Hu, Jianying
Han, Tao
Chen, Yan
Wang, Hongyu
Ma, Tao
description The raw materials selection and design of waterproof polymer concrete for steel bridge deck paving lack clarity regarding the adhesion mechanism and optimal compatibility between acrylate composite polyurethane binder (APUB) and various aggregates. This study systematically investigates these issues based on surface free energy (SFE) theory. Initially, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques are utilized to characterize chemical structure of APUB. Subsequently, obtaining the SFE parameters of APUB and aggregates through contact angle tests, and establishing the evaluation indices compatibility ratios ERs (ER1 and ER2) for the most compatible APUB-aggregate pairs. Finally, the correlation between ERs and the water stability of the APUB-aggregate pair is verified through shear tests conducted on sandwich specimens immersed in water. The findings reveal that APUB exhibits both acidic and non-polar surface properties. The SFE values of all aggregates surpasses that of APUB, indicating APUB's ability to wet the surfaces of all aggregates. Under dry conditions, non-polar basalt and limestone aggregates exhibit strong adhesion to APUB. This is primarily due to the combined effects of acid-base chemical reactions and the principle of compatibility, with the former predominating. Under wet conditions, APUB on non-polar basalt and limestone surfaces exhibits reduced susceptibility to displacement and detachment by water. The closer the polarity component of polar aggregates is to that of water, the easier water can displace APUB from the polar aggregate surfaces. Correlation analysis between the maximum shear force of the immersed specimens and the ER2 indicates that the APUB-basalt pair has the best compatibility. The cohesive work of APUB is crucial in establishing compatibility indicators for evaluating APUB-aggregate pairs. This study provides a theoretical basis for the raw material selection and design of polymer concrete for steel bridge deck paving. [Display omitted] •APUB demonstrates both acidic and non-polar surface characteristics.•APUB can wet basalt, limestone, granite, pebble, diabase and diorite surfaces.•APUB-basalt pair has optimal compatibility.•ER2 is a convenient index for assessing the compatibility of APUB-aggregate pairs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137236
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_conbuildmat_2024_137236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S095006182402378X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S095006182402378X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-e15687c6feb59f39c120f2267e994cf0424e244a246029a18399c1ee770bb28a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkN1KxDAQhYMouP68Q3yA1iRt0-ZSFv9gQRC9Dmk6abO0zZJkhb6Bl-Ij-iS2rhdeejUzzDlzhg-hK0pSSii_3qbajfXe9s2gYsoIy1OalSzjR2hFq1IkpGD8GK2IKEhCOK1O0VkIW0IIZ5yt0MczBFBed9iNOHaAVdNBsPMwgO7UaMOA1dhg7Yadira2vY0TdgYr7adeRfjZuGDnbuf6ae8hzjbAtR0b8Pjr_ROrtvXQLtpaBWiWpLD3RmnAxgNgGMG305Lu_HSBTozqA1z-1nP0enf7sn5INk_3j-ubTaKpKGICtOBVqbmBuhAmE5oyYhjjJQiRa0NylgPLc8VyTphQtMrErAEoS1LXrFLZORKHu9q7EDwYufN2UH6SlMgFrdzKP2jlglYe0M7e9cEL84NvFrwM2sKoobEedJSNs_-48g1-z4ys</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Research on the adhesion mechanism and compatibility of acrylate composite polyurethane binder − aggregate based on surface free energy theory</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Duan, Shaochan ; Cui, Jingxian ; Hu, Jianying ; Han, Tao ; Chen, Yan ; Wang, Hongyu ; Ma, Tao</creator><creatorcontrib>Duan, Shaochan ; Cui, Jingxian ; Hu, Jianying ; Han, Tao ; Chen, Yan ; Wang, Hongyu ; Ma, Tao</creatorcontrib><description>The raw materials selection and design of waterproof polymer concrete for steel bridge deck paving lack clarity regarding the adhesion mechanism and optimal compatibility between acrylate composite polyurethane binder (APUB) and various aggregates. This study systematically investigates these issues based on surface free energy (SFE) theory. Initially, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques are utilized to characterize chemical structure of APUB. Subsequently, obtaining the SFE parameters of APUB and aggregates through contact angle tests, and establishing the evaluation indices compatibility ratios ERs (ER1 and ER2) for the most compatible APUB-aggregate pairs. Finally, the correlation between ERs and the water stability of the APUB-aggregate pair is verified through shear tests conducted on sandwich specimens immersed in water. The findings reveal that APUB exhibits both acidic and non-polar surface properties. The SFE values of all aggregates surpasses that of APUB, indicating APUB's ability to wet the surfaces of all aggregates. Under dry conditions, non-polar basalt and limestone aggregates exhibit strong adhesion to APUB. This is primarily due to the combined effects of acid-base chemical reactions and the principle of compatibility, with the former predominating. Under wet conditions, APUB on non-polar basalt and limestone surfaces exhibits reduced susceptibility to displacement and detachment by water. The closer the polarity component of polar aggregates is to that of water, the easier water can displace APUB from the polar aggregate surfaces. Correlation analysis between the maximum shear force of the immersed specimens and the ER2 indicates that the APUB-basalt pair has the best compatibility. The cohesive work of APUB is crucial in establishing compatibility indicators for evaluating APUB-aggregate pairs. This study provides a theoretical basis for the raw material selection and design of polymer concrete for steel bridge deck paving. [Display omitted] •APUB demonstrates both acidic and non-polar surface characteristics.•APUB can wet basalt, limestone, granite, pebble, diabase and diorite surfaces.•APUB-basalt pair has optimal compatibility.•ER2 is a convenient index for assessing the compatibility of APUB-aggregate pairs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-0618</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0526</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137236</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adhesion work ; Peeling work ; Polymer concrete ; Steel bridge deck paving ; Surface free energy</subject><ispartof>Construction &amp; building materials, 2024-08, Vol.438, p.137236, Article 137236</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-e15687c6feb59f39c120f2267e994cf0424e244a246029a18399c1ee770bb28a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7963-9370</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duan, Shaochan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Jingxian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jianying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hongyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Tao</creatorcontrib><title>Research on the adhesion mechanism and compatibility of acrylate composite polyurethane binder − aggregate based on surface free energy theory</title><title>Construction &amp; building materials</title><description>The raw materials selection and design of waterproof polymer concrete for steel bridge deck paving lack clarity regarding the adhesion mechanism and optimal compatibility between acrylate composite polyurethane binder (APUB) and various aggregates. This study systematically investigates these issues based on surface free energy (SFE) theory. Initially, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques are utilized to characterize chemical structure of APUB. Subsequently, obtaining the SFE parameters of APUB and aggregates through contact angle tests, and establishing the evaluation indices compatibility ratios ERs (ER1 and ER2) for the most compatible APUB-aggregate pairs. Finally, the correlation between ERs and the water stability of the APUB-aggregate pair is verified through shear tests conducted on sandwich specimens immersed in water. The findings reveal that APUB exhibits both acidic and non-polar surface properties. The SFE values of all aggregates surpasses that of APUB, indicating APUB's ability to wet the surfaces of all aggregates. Under dry conditions, non-polar basalt and limestone aggregates exhibit strong adhesion to APUB. This is primarily due to the combined effects of acid-base chemical reactions and the principle of compatibility, with the former predominating. Under wet conditions, APUB on non-polar basalt and limestone surfaces exhibits reduced susceptibility to displacement and detachment by water. The closer the polarity component of polar aggregates is to that of water, the easier water can displace APUB from the polar aggregate surfaces. Correlation analysis between the maximum shear force of the immersed specimens and the ER2 indicates that the APUB-basalt pair has the best compatibility. The cohesive work of APUB is crucial in establishing compatibility indicators for evaluating APUB-aggregate pairs. This study provides a theoretical basis for the raw material selection and design of polymer concrete for steel bridge deck paving. [Display omitted] •APUB demonstrates both acidic and non-polar surface characteristics.•APUB can wet basalt, limestone, granite, pebble, diabase and diorite surfaces.•APUB-basalt pair has optimal compatibility.•ER2 is a convenient index for assessing the compatibility of APUB-aggregate pairs.</description><subject>Adhesion work</subject><subject>Peeling work</subject><subject>Polymer concrete</subject><subject>Steel bridge deck paving</subject><subject>Surface free energy</subject><issn>0950-0618</issn><issn>1879-0526</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkN1KxDAQhYMouP68Q3yA1iRt0-ZSFv9gQRC9Dmk6abO0zZJkhb6Bl-Ij-iS2rhdeejUzzDlzhg-hK0pSSii_3qbajfXe9s2gYsoIy1OalSzjR2hFq1IkpGD8GK2IKEhCOK1O0VkIW0IIZ5yt0MczBFBed9iNOHaAVdNBsPMwgO7UaMOA1dhg7Yadira2vY0TdgYr7adeRfjZuGDnbuf6ae8hzjbAtR0b8Pjr_ROrtvXQLtpaBWiWpLD3RmnAxgNgGMG305Lu_HSBTozqA1z-1nP0enf7sn5INk_3j-ubTaKpKGICtOBVqbmBuhAmE5oyYhjjJQiRa0NylgPLc8VyTphQtMrErAEoS1LXrFLZORKHu9q7EDwYufN2UH6SlMgFrdzKP2jlglYe0M7e9cEL84NvFrwM2sKoobEedJSNs_-48g1-z4ys</recordid><startdate>20240809</startdate><enddate>20240809</enddate><creator>Duan, Shaochan</creator><creator>Cui, Jingxian</creator><creator>Hu, Jianying</creator><creator>Han, Tao</creator><creator>Chen, Yan</creator><creator>Wang, Hongyu</creator><creator>Ma, Tao</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7963-9370</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240809</creationdate><title>Research on the adhesion mechanism and compatibility of acrylate composite polyurethane binder − aggregate based on surface free energy theory</title><author>Duan, Shaochan ; Cui, Jingxian ; Hu, Jianying ; Han, Tao ; Chen, Yan ; Wang, Hongyu ; Ma, Tao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-e15687c6feb59f39c120f2267e994cf0424e244a246029a18399c1ee770bb28a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adhesion work</topic><topic>Peeling work</topic><topic>Polymer concrete</topic><topic>Steel bridge deck paving</topic><topic>Surface free energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duan, Shaochan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Jingxian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jianying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hongyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Tao</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Construction &amp; building materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duan, Shaochan</au><au>Cui, Jingxian</au><au>Hu, Jianying</au><au>Han, Tao</au><au>Chen, Yan</au><au>Wang, Hongyu</au><au>Ma, Tao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Research on the adhesion mechanism and compatibility of acrylate composite polyurethane binder − aggregate based on surface free energy theory</atitle><jtitle>Construction &amp; building materials</jtitle><date>2024-08-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>438</volume><spage>137236</spage><pages>137236-</pages><artnum>137236</artnum><issn>0950-0618</issn><eissn>1879-0526</eissn><abstract>The raw materials selection and design of waterproof polymer concrete for steel bridge deck paving lack clarity regarding the adhesion mechanism and optimal compatibility between acrylate composite polyurethane binder (APUB) and various aggregates. This study systematically investigates these issues based on surface free energy (SFE) theory. Initially, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques are utilized to characterize chemical structure of APUB. Subsequently, obtaining the SFE parameters of APUB and aggregates through contact angle tests, and establishing the evaluation indices compatibility ratios ERs (ER1 and ER2) for the most compatible APUB-aggregate pairs. Finally, the correlation between ERs and the water stability of the APUB-aggregate pair is verified through shear tests conducted on sandwich specimens immersed in water. The findings reveal that APUB exhibits both acidic and non-polar surface properties. The SFE values of all aggregates surpasses that of APUB, indicating APUB's ability to wet the surfaces of all aggregates. Under dry conditions, non-polar basalt and limestone aggregates exhibit strong adhesion to APUB. This is primarily due to the combined effects of acid-base chemical reactions and the principle of compatibility, with the former predominating. Under wet conditions, APUB on non-polar basalt and limestone surfaces exhibits reduced susceptibility to displacement and detachment by water. The closer the polarity component of polar aggregates is to that of water, the easier water can displace APUB from the polar aggregate surfaces. Correlation analysis between the maximum shear force of the immersed specimens and the ER2 indicates that the APUB-basalt pair has the best compatibility. The cohesive work of APUB is crucial in establishing compatibility indicators for evaluating APUB-aggregate pairs. This study provides a theoretical basis for the raw material selection and design of polymer concrete for steel bridge deck paving. [Display omitted] •APUB demonstrates both acidic and non-polar surface characteristics.•APUB can wet basalt, limestone, granite, pebble, diabase and diorite surfaces.•APUB-basalt pair has optimal compatibility.•ER2 is a convenient index for assessing the compatibility of APUB-aggregate pairs.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137236</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7963-9370</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-0618
ispartof Construction & building materials, 2024-08, Vol.438, p.137236, Article 137236
issn 0950-0618
1879-0526
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_conbuildmat_2024_137236
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adhesion work
Peeling work
Polymer concrete
Steel bridge deck paving
Surface free energy
title Research on the adhesion mechanism and compatibility of acrylate composite polyurethane binder − aggregate based on surface free energy theory
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A17%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Research%20on%20the%20adhesion%20mechanism%20and%20compatibility%20of%20acrylate%20composite%20polyurethane%20binder%20%E2%88%92%20aggregate%20based%20on%20surface%20free%20energy%20theory&rft.jtitle=Construction%20&%20building%20materials&rft.au=Duan,%20Shaochan&rft.date=2024-08-09&rft.volume=438&rft.spage=137236&rft.pages=137236-&rft.artnum=137236&rft.issn=0950-0618&rft.eissn=1879-0526&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137236&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES095006182402378X%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-e15687c6feb59f39c120f2267e994cf0424e244a246029a18399c1ee770bb28a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true