Loading…

Bond stress-slip properties and analytical models between high-strength lightweight aggregate concrete and high-strength steel bars

Twenty-eight pull-out specimens in thirteen groups were tested to investigate the bond properties between high-strength lightweight aggregate concrete (HSLC) and HRB600 bars with different bond lengths, steel fiber contents, concrete strength, and cover thickness. The analytical expressions for radi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Construction & building materials 2024-12, Vol.454, p.139110, Article 139110
Main Authors: Wei, Hui, Xiao, Zhengyan, Wu, Tao, Zhao, Shibo, Shen, Wenshuo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-e3990e8e69251438024f96fa23ca016ddd020a6b43671d213e87d395295b5e483
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 139110
container_title Construction & building materials
container_volume 454
creator Wei, Hui
Xiao, Zhengyan
Wu, Tao
Zhao, Shibo
Shen, Wenshuo
description Twenty-eight pull-out specimens in thirteen groups were tested to investigate the bond properties between high-strength lightweight aggregate concrete (HSLC) and HRB600 bars with different bond lengths, steel fiber contents, concrete strength, and cover thickness. The analytical expressions for radial deformation, radial stress, and bond strength based on four deformation assumptions were derived and compared by incorporating the thick-walled cylinder model, bilinear softening constitutive curve, and fracture energy model of HSLC. Eventually, a three-segment bond stress-slip model was proposed. The test results showed that the increase in research parameters apart from bond length could improve the failure mode, bond strength, descending slope of curves, and bond toughness. The bond strength was in the range of 24.99 ∼ 39.79 MPa except for LC70–0S-L80 with splitting failure. The optimal match of mixture LC70–0.6S and HRB600 bars could fully utilize the mechanical properties of both materials, for which the allowable minimum ratio of cover thickness-to-rebar diameter was recommended to be 3.75. The bond toughness of specimens cast with LC70–0S, LC70–0.3S, LC50–0.6S, and LC70–0.6S increased sequentially at the same bond length. The calculation results indicated that the assumptions of constant and elastic deformation provided upper and lower predictions of bond strength, respectively, and the assumption of equivalent elastic deformation slightly overestimated the bond strength due to the nonlinear deformation of cracked concrete. The assumption of equivalent elastic deformation at cohesive stress equaling half of the tensile strength of concrete obtained satisfactory calculated bond strengths, and the predicted bond stress-slip curves agreed well with the experimental curves, describing accurately the cracking characteristics and bond behavior between HSLC and HRB600 bars. •The failure mode, bond strength, bond stress-slip curves, and bond toughness were analyzed.•The bond strength ranged from 24.99 MPa to 39.79 MPa, and the allowable minimum c/d was recommended to be 3.75.•The analytical expressions for bond strength based on four deformation assumptions were derived.•A bond stress-slip model was proposed, and the experimental and predicted results were compared.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139110
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_conbuildmat_2024_139110</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0950061824042521</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0950061824042521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-e3990e8e69251438024f96fa23ca016ddd020a6b43671d213e87d395295b5e483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkLtOwzAUhj2ARCm8g3mABF8SNx6h4lKpEgvMlmOfpK7cJLINqDMvjqMywMZyrvp_nfMhdENJSQkVt_vSjEP77rw96FQywqqSckkpOUMLImtSEEGbC3QZ454QIphgC_R1Pw4WxxQgxiJ6N-EpjBOE5CBinVd60P6YnNEeH0YLPuIW0ifAgHeu3xWzcujTDvvc5fkcse77AL1OgPNBJkAuZqu_gpgAPG51iFfovNM-wvVPXqK3x4fX9XOxfXnarO-2haGyTgVwKQk0ICSracWb_F8nRacZNzq_b60ljGjRVlysqGWUQ7OyXNZM1m0NVcOXSJ58TRhjDNCpKbiDDkdFiZoJqr36RVDNBNWJYNauT9pMAD4cBBWNg8GAdQFMUnZ0_3D5BpXfhRM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bond stress-slip properties and analytical models between high-strength lightweight aggregate concrete and high-strength steel bars</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Wei, Hui ; Xiao, Zhengyan ; Wu, Tao ; Zhao, Shibo ; Shen, Wenshuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Wei, Hui ; Xiao, Zhengyan ; Wu, Tao ; Zhao, Shibo ; Shen, Wenshuo</creatorcontrib><description>Twenty-eight pull-out specimens in thirteen groups were tested to investigate the bond properties between high-strength lightweight aggregate concrete (HSLC) and HRB600 bars with different bond lengths, steel fiber contents, concrete strength, and cover thickness. The analytical expressions for radial deformation, radial stress, and bond strength based on four deformation assumptions were derived and compared by incorporating the thick-walled cylinder model, bilinear softening constitutive curve, and fracture energy model of HSLC. Eventually, a three-segment bond stress-slip model was proposed. The test results showed that the increase in research parameters apart from bond length could improve the failure mode, bond strength, descending slope of curves, and bond toughness. The bond strength was in the range of 24.99 ∼ 39.79 MPa except for LC70–0S-L80 with splitting failure. The optimal match of mixture LC70–0.6S and HRB600 bars could fully utilize the mechanical properties of both materials, for which the allowable minimum ratio of cover thickness-to-rebar diameter was recommended to be 3.75. The bond toughness of specimens cast with LC70–0S, LC70–0.3S, LC50–0.6S, and LC70–0.6S increased sequentially at the same bond length. The calculation results indicated that the assumptions of constant and elastic deformation provided upper and lower predictions of bond strength, respectively, and the assumption of equivalent elastic deformation slightly overestimated the bond strength due to the nonlinear deformation of cracked concrete. The assumption of equivalent elastic deformation at cohesive stress equaling half of the tensile strength of concrete obtained satisfactory calculated bond strengths, and the predicted bond stress-slip curves agreed well with the experimental curves, describing accurately the cracking characteristics and bond behavior between HSLC and HRB600 bars. •The failure mode, bond strength, bond stress-slip curves, and bond toughness were analyzed.•The bond strength ranged from 24.99 MPa to 39.79 MPa, and the allowable minimum c/d was recommended to be 3.75.•The analytical expressions for bond strength based on four deformation assumptions were derived.•A bond stress-slip model was proposed, and the experimental and predicted results were compared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-0618</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139110</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analytical models ; Bilinear softening curve ; Bond stress-slip relationship ; High-strength lightweight aggregate concrete ; High-strength steel bars ; Thick-walled cylinder model</subject><ispartof>Construction &amp; building materials, 2024-12, Vol.454, p.139110, Article 139110</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-e3990e8e69251438024f96fa23ca016ddd020a6b43671d213e87d395295b5e483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wei, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Zhengyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Shibo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Wenshuo</creatorcontrib><title>Bond stress-slip properties and analytical models between high-strength lightweight aggregate concrete and high-strength steel bars</title><title>Construction &amp; building materials</title><description>Twenty-eight pull-out specimens in thirteen groups were tested to investigate the bond properties between high-strength lightweight aggregate concrete (HSLC) and HRB600 bars with different bond lengths, steel fiber contents, concrete strength, and cover thickness. The analytical expressions for radial deformation, radial stress, and bond strength based on four deformation assumptions were derived and compared by incorporating the thick-walled cylinder model, bilinear softening constitutive curve, and fracture energy model of HSLC. Eventually, a three-segment bond stress-slip model was proposed. The test results showed that the increase in research parameters apart from bond length could improve the failure mode, bond strength, descending slope of curves, and bond toughness. The bond strength was in the range of 24.99 ∼ 39.79 MPa except for LC70–0S-L80 with splitting failure. The optimal match of mixture LC70–0.6S and HRB600 bars could fully utilize the mechanical properties of both materials, for which the allowable minimum ratio of cover thickness-to-rebar diameter was recommended to be 3.75. The bond toughness of specimens cast with LC70–0S, LC70–0.3S, LC50–0.6S, and LC70–0.6S increased sequentially at the same bond length. The calculation results indicated that the assumptions of constant and elastic deformation provided upper and lower predictions of bond strength, respectively, and the assumption of equivalent elastic deformation slightly overestimated the bond strength due to the nonlinear deformation of cracked concrete. The assumption of equivalent elastic deformation at cohesive stress equaling half of the tensile strength of concrete obtained satisfactory calculated bond strengths, and the predicted bond stress-slip curves agreed well with the experimental curves, describing accurately the cracking characteristics and bond behavior between HSLC and HRB600 bars. •The failure mode, bond strength, bond stress-slip curves, and bond toughness were analyzed.•The bond strength ranged from 24.99 MPa to 39.79 MPa, and the allowable minimum c/d was recommended to be 3.75.•The analytical expressions for bond strength based on four deformation assumptions were derived.•A bond stress-slip model was proposed, and the experimental and predicted results were compared.</description><subject>Analytical models</subject><subject>Bilinear softening curve</subject><subject>Bond stress-slip relationship</subject><subject>High-strength lightweight aggregate concrete</subject><subject>High-strength steel bars</subject><subject>Thick-walled cylinder model</subject><issn>0950-0618</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkLtOwzAUhj2ARCm8g3mABF8SNx6h4lKpEgvMlmOfpK7cJLINqDMvjqMywMZyrvp_nfMhdENJSQkVt_vSjEP77rw96FQywqqSckkpOUMLImtSEEGbC3QZ454QIphgC_R1Pw4WxxQgxiJ6N-EpjBOE5CBinVd60P6YnNEeH0YLPuIW0ifAgHeu3xWzcujTDvvc5fkcse77AL1OgPNBJkAuZqu_gpgAPG51iFfovNM-wvVPXqK3x4fX9XOxfXnarO-2haGyTgVwKQk0ICSracWb_F8nRacZNzq_b60ljGjRVlysqGWUQ7OyXNZM1m0NVcOXSJ58TRhjDNCpKbiDDkdFiZoJqr36RVDNBNWJYNauT9pMAD4cBBWNg8GAdQFMUnZ0_3D5BpXfhRM</recordid><startdate>20241206</startdate><enddate>20241206</enddate><creator>Wei, Hui</creator><creator>Xiao, Zhengyan</creator><creator>Wu, Tao</creator><creator>Zhao, Shibo</creator><creator>Shen, Wenshuo</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241206</creationdate><title>Bond stress-slip properties and analytical models between high-strength lightweight aggregate concrete and high-strength steel bars</title><author>Wei, Hui ; Xiao, Zhengyan ; Wu, Tao ; Zhao, Shibo ; Shen, Wenshuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-e3990e8e69251438024f96fa23ca016ddd020a6b43671d213e87d395295b5e483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analytical models</topic><topic>Bilinear softening curve</topic><topic>Bond stress-slip relationship</topic><topic>High-strength lightweight aggregate concrete</topic><topic>High-strength steel bars</topic><topic>Thick-walled cylinder model</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Zhengyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Shibo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Wenshuo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Construction &amp; building materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei, Hui</au><au>Xiao, Zhengyan</au><au>Wu, Tao</au><au>Zhao, Shibo</au><au>Shen, Wenshuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bond stress-slip properties and analytical models between high-strength lightweight aggregate concrete and high-strength steel bars</atitle><jtitle>Construction &amp; building materials</jtitle><date>2024-12-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>454</volume><spage>139110</spage><pages>139110-</pages><artnum>139110</artnum><issn>0950-0618</issn><abstract>Twenty-eight pull-out specimens in thirteen groups were tested to investigate the bond properties between high-strength lightweight aggregate concrete (HSLC) and HRB600 bars with different bond lengths, steel fiber contents, concrete strength, and cover thickness. The analytical expressions for radial deformation, radial stress, and bond strength based on four deformation assumptions were derived and compared by incorporating the thick-walled cylinder model, bilinear softening constitutive curve, and fracture energy model of HSLC. Eventually, a three-segment bond stress-slip model was proposed. The test results showed that the increase in research parameters apart from bond length could improve the failure mode, bond strength, descending slope of curves, and bond toughness. The bond strength was in the range of 24.99 ∼ 39.79 MPa except for LC70–0S-L80 with splitting failure. The optimal match of mixture LC70–0.6S and HRB600 bars could fully utilize the mechanical properties of both materials, for which the allowable minimum ratio of cover thickness-to-rebar diameter was recommended to be 3.75. The bond toughness of specimens cast with LC70–0S, LC70–0.3S, LC50–0.6S, and LC70–0.6S increased sequentially at the same bond length. The calculation results indicated that the assumptions of constant and elastic deformation provided upper and lower predictions of bond strength, respectively, and the assumption of equivalent elastic deformation slightly overestimated the bond strength due to the nonlinear deformation of cracked concrete. The assumption of equivalent elastic deformation at cohesive stress equaling half of the tensile strength of concrete obtained satisfactory calculated bond strengths, and the predicted bond stress-slip curves agreed well with the experimental curves, describing accurately the cracking characteristics and bond behavior between HSLC and HRB600 bars. •The failure mode, bond strength, bond stress-slip curves, and bond toughness were analyzed.•The bond strength ranged from 24.99 MPa to 39.79 MPa, and the allowable minimum c/d was recommended to be 3.75.•The analytical expressions for bond strength based on four deformation assumptions were derived.•A bond stress-slip model was proposed, and the experimental and predicted results were compared.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139110</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-0618
ispartof Construction & building materials, 2024-12, Vol.454, p.139110, Article 139110
issn 0950-0618
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_conbuildmat_2024_139110
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Analytical models
Bilinear softening curve
Bond stress-slip relationship
High-strength lightweight aggregate concrete
High-strength steel bars
Thick-walled cylinder model
title Bond stress-slip properties and analytical models between high-strength lightweight aggregate concrete and high-strength steel bars
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A45%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bond%20stress-slip%20properties%20and%20analytical%20models%20between%20high-strength%20lightweight%20aggregate%20concrete%20and%20high-strength%20steel%20bars&rft.jtitle=Construction%20&%20building%20materials&rft.au=Wei,%20Hui&rft.date=2024-12-06&rft.volume=454&rft.spage=139110&rft.pages=139110-&rft.artnum=139110&rft.issn=0950-0618&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139110&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0950061824042521%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c195t-e3990e8e69251438024f96fa23ca016ddd020a6b43671d213e87d395295b5e483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true