Loading…
Multidisciplinary Studies on Canvas Nature of Paintings at IFIN-HH Romania
Radiocarbon dating of pictorial support is usually less used. It is accepted for paintings with the estimated age older than the Stradivarius limit (ca. 1600 - 1650 CE) as stated by A.J.T. Jull in 1997, and not as an authentication method. Considering this, a seventeenth century oil-based painting (...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of cultural heritage 2021-11, Vol.52, p.107-117 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Radiocarbon dating of pictorial support is usually less used. It is accepted for paintings with the estimated age older than the Stradivarius limit (ca. 1600 - 1650 CE) as stated by A.J.T. Jull in 1997, and not as an authentication method. Considering this, a seventeenth century oil-based painting (Main Case Study) is reported. Based on the results obtained as terminus post quem, the painting cannot be attributed to the famous painter from the classical period, considered to be the author, according to the signature. Two other recently solved cases (Sample 1 and Sample 2) are briefly recorded and the information obtained was used for a more accurate interpretation of the Main Case Study.
The multidisciplinary research aimed to put together, for the first time in the RoAMS Laboratory Romania, the information obtained through elemental analysis, ATR-FTIR, FT-Raman and XRF spectrometry. Radiocarbon dating process includes a comparative description of pictorial fragment pretreatments, of the textile fiber graphitization stage, and of AMS measurements used for determinations of isotopic ratio of carbon species, and general process parameter δ13C, of percent of Modern Carbon, and Conventional Radiocarbon Age, and of the Standard Deviations.
The fragment of (Main Case Study) was first investigated using both FT-Raman and ATR-FTIR spectrometry. The spectra obtained reveal that the painting surface was covered with a thick layer of linseed oil, which hinders a complete analysis of the pigments through FT-Raman and ATR-FTIR spectrometry. However, the white pigment (lead white) and primer (calcium carbonate) were successfully identified. The findings from ATR-FTIR and FT-Raman spectra provide reliable information about the contaminants, information that is further used to select the most appropriate dating strategy. Before the AMS measurements, the cleaned textile fibers were investigated by elemental analysis, ATR-FTIR and micro-DRIFT spectrometry. The data obtained were compared with known natural and artificial textile fibers. The results reveal an almost complete decontamination, which additionally underlines the assumption that the textile support used exhibits a synthetic nature. Most likely, the canvas was made of synthetic nylon 6.6 fibers on a texture close to sailboat, used for sailing in the mid-twentieth century. The findings were finally confirmed by radiocarbon dating. 14C/12C isotopic ratios were close to RoAMS Laboratory background level, certifying a |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1296-2074 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.culher.2021.09.008 |