Loading…

Experimental and economic evaluation of nanofiltration as a pre-treatment for added-value elements recovery from seawater desalination brines

Desalination brine mining emerges as a solution to supply raw materials to the European Union industry in a circular economy approach since valuable minerals and metals (e.g., B(III), Mg(II), Ca(II), Sc(III), V(V), In(III), Ga(III), Li(I), Mo(VI), Rb(I)) are present in seawater but in low concentrat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Desalination 2023-03, Vol.549, p.116321, Article 116321
Main Authors: Figueira, Mariana, Rodríguez-Jiménez, Daniel, López, Julio, Reig, Mònica, Cortina, José Luis, Valderrama, César
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Desalination brine mining emerges as a solution to supply raw materials to the European Union industry in a circular economy approach since valuable minerals and metals (e.g., B(III), Mg(II), Ca(II), Sc(III), V(V), In(III), Ga(III), Li(I), Mo(VI), Rb(I)) are present in seawater but in low concentrations. Brine pre-treatment is important to remove species that may impair the performance of other technologies involved and to increase recovery efficiencies. Hence, nanofiltration and calcium precipitation were proposed as pre-treatment stages. Nanofiltration was studied to separate monovalent from multivalent elements (Fonsalía desalination plant case study), while economically, it was evaluated whether it would be better to place it before (Scenario 1) or after (Scenario 2) a Ca(II) precipitation stage, considering that Ca(II) can produce scaling in membranes. Three commercial membranes were tested using synthetic brines at 30 bar. Experiments (65 % permeate recovery) showed that Fortilife XC-N and PRO-XS2 membranes presented higher Ca(II) and Mg(II) rejection than NF270. Heating the brine for Ca(II) precipitation jeopardizes the economic feasibility of the project. Scenario 1 was the best configuration since it presented lower total levelized cost (≈1.6 €/m3 inlet, without heating the brine for Ca(II) removal). In such scenario, PRO-XS2 reported the best selectivity between monovalent and multivalent elements. [Display omitted] •Nanofiltration experiments compared 3 membranes for desalination brine valorization.•NF must be done before Ca removal stage at brine treatment for resource recovery.•PRO-XS2 presented the highest selectivity between mono- and multivalent elements.•Heating the brine for Ca removal jeopardizes the project's economic feasibility.•Total levelized cost of 1.6 €/m3 was estimated for Fonsalía plant brine.
ISSN:0011-9164
1873-4464
DOI:10.1016/j.desal.2022.116321