Loading…

Modeling the complex associations of human wellbeing dimensions in a coupled human-natural system: In contexts of marginalized communities

•People extract ecosystem services according to their wellbeing needs.•Wellbeing dimension interactions modeling requires defining wellbeing robustly.•A single model is not able to capture the complex nature of human wellbeing.•Wellbeing dimensions play supplementary/complementary roles to shape eac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological modelling 2022-04, Vol.466, p.109883, Article 109883
Main Authors: Kibria, Abu SMG, Costanza, Robert, Soto, José R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•People extract ecosystem services according to their wellbeing needs.•Wellbeing dimension interactions modeling requires defining wellbeing robustly.•A single model is not able to capture the complex nature of human wellbeing.•Wellbeing dimensions play supplementary/complementary roles to shape each other. Understanding the underlying complexity in human wellbeing formation is indispensable to maintain sustainable ecosystem services production and ensure greater human wellbeing. The interactions between wellbeing dimensions that creat the complexity are yet to be adequately understood. This study is designed to reveal the complex mechanisms shaping the wellbeing of the communities who are heavily reliant on ecosystem based livelihoods. In order to represent the robustness of wellbeing due to the economic dependency on the ecosystem services, we have taken into account six wellbeing dimensions- food sufficiency, livelihood security, physical health, stress level (mental), freedom of choice, and social cohesion. This study has identified the criteria of each dimension and provided empirical evidence on how the dimensions as well as their criteria influence each other. The wellbeing dimensions created a complex association that significantly shaped the wellbeing of the people. We found that food sufficiency was significantly influenced by not only its criteria but also the status of livelihood security, mental health, and freedom of choice which also had their own criteria sets. Similar relations were also observed in other dimensions. The findings would play a vital role in enhancing the resilience of coupled human-natural systems and thereby achieving greater sustainability.
ISSN:0304-3800
1872-7026
DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109883