Loading…
The impact of community schools on student dropout in pre-vocational education
•First quasi-experimental study on community schools in secondary education.•Use of administrative panel data including the full student population.•Estimation of the community school impact by means of a difference-in-differences estimation model combined with an iterative matching approach. Dropou...
Saved in:
Published in: | Economics of education review 2014-08, Vol.41, p.105-119 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •First quasi-experimental study on community schools in secondary education.•Use of administrative panel data including the full student population.•Estimation of the community school impact by means of a difference-in-differences estimation model combined with an iterative matching approach.
Dropout prevention is highly ranked on the political agenda in many countries. It remains unclear, however, how dropout can be effectively reduced, as many different factors determine student dropout. Community schools recognize this and aim to modernize education such that it better accommodates students’ personal needs. As a result these schools cooperate more with external organizations, stimulate parental involvement in the educational process, and organize more extracurricular activities. This study examines the impact of Dutch community schools on student dropout. It focuses in particular on pre-vocational education, because dropout is particularly high in this educational track. Moreover, the focus is on the city of Rotterdam because this city is a frontrunner in the Netherlands in establishing community schools. Use is made of unique registration data on all Rotterdam students who were enrolled in pre-vocational education between 2004 and 2008. The impact of community schools is identified by exploiting the fact that community schools were not created before the beginning of the school year 2006/2007. This enables us to estimate the community school impact by means of a difference-in-differences estimation model combined with an iterative matching approach. The estimation results suggest that community schools are as effective as regular schools with respect to dropout reduction. Community school subsidies do not seem to contribute to reducing dropout. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0272-7757 1873-7382 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.05.003 |