Loading…

Barriers to PES programs in Indigenous communities: A lesson in land tenure insecurity from the Hopi Indian reservation

•We study barriers to implementation of PES in Indigenous communities in the US.•We identify 4 barriers: land tenure, capital, communication, and institutions.•All four barriers are linked to Indigenous land tenure insecurity.•Successful PES programs must do more to understand Indigenous land tenure...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecosystem services 2018-08, Vol.32, p.62-69
Main Authors: Johnson, Michael Kotutwa, Lien, Aaron M., Sherman, Natalya Robbins, López-Hoffman, Laura
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•We study barriers to implementation of PES in Indigenous communities in the US.•We identify 4 barriers: land tenure, capital, communication, and institutions.•All four barriers are linked to Indigenous land tenure insecurity.•Successful PES programs must do more to understand Indigenous land tenure. There has been significant study of barriers to implementation of payment for ecosystem services in Indigenous communities in less developed countries. These barriers include land tenure insecurity and lack of access to capital. However, there is no similar research in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. Our research fills this gap. We hypothesize that mismatches between the traditional land tenure regimes and institutional arrangements of Indigenous communities on one hand, and government sponsors of PES programs on the other hand, result in the lack of success of these programs. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a qualitative study of the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) on the Hopi reservation in the United States. We answer two questions: (1) What barriers prevent Hopi ranchers and farmers from participating in incentive-based programs? (2) What institutional changes are necessary to permit Hopi farmer and rancher participation in EQIP? We analyzed primary documents and conducted key informant interviews. We conclude that land tenure is at the forefront of problems associated with administering PES programs in Indigenous communities. Without new approaches addressing the land tenure regimes in Indigenous communities, PES will continue to struggle on American Indian reservations and around the world.
ISSN:2212-0416
2212-0416
DOI:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.05.009