Loading…

Ecosystem services and cost-effective benefits from the reclamation of saline sodic land under different paddy field systems

[Display omitted] •Assessed the market and non-market benefits, costs, and benefit-cost ratios of different paddy systems.•Reclaiming saline-sodic soils can relieve food shortages and enhance ecosystem services.•Rice-crab and rice-fish co-culture systems had the highest market value.•Ecosystem servi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecosystem services 2024-12, Vol.70, p.101682, Article 101682
Main Authors: Zhou, Tairan, Hu, Hao, Hu, Jiaxin, Yang, Ziye, Lv, Qilin, Wang, Yajun, Yan, Binwei, Ren, Xueqin, Hu, Shuwen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-3104bc65931b1ddf4df578e348c2a12aa45bdc9296613dd48f3f5e91a72d3e603
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 101682
container_title Ecosystem services
container_volume 70
creator Zhou, Tairan
Hu, Hao
Hu, Jiaxin
Yang, Ziye
Lv, Qilin
Wang, Yajun
Yan, Binwei
Ren, Xueqin
Hu, Shuwen
description [Display omitted] •Assessed the market and non-market benefits, costs, and benefit-cost ratios of different paddy systems.•Reclaiming saline-sodic soils can relieve food shortages and enhance ecosystem services.•Rice-crab and rice-fish co-culture systems had the highest market value.•Ecosystem service values increased with market benefits over extended cultivation periods. Reclamation of saline-sodic soils can unlock vast potential resources, relieve food shortages, and increase valuable ecosystem services. While previous investigations have focused on the current ecosystem service (ES) value of reclaimed paddy fields, the potential long-term costs and benefits of reclamation are still largely unknown. To fill this important research gap, we assessed ES values of reclaimed paddies at the field scale, using primary data collected from 15 different paddy management systems. We assessed the market and non-market benefits, costs, and benefit-cost ratios (BCR) of three different reclamation models and two coculture models across a chronosequence of paddy sites (cultivated for up to 50 years). Our results demonstrate that the addition of cellulose sulfonated modified composite (CSMC) and flue gas desulfurization gypsum (FGDG) substantially increased the net ecosystem service value (NESV) by 16.53 % and 52.21 %, respectively, compared to control paddy cultivation sites. Additionally, integrated rice-crab and rice-fish coculture systems presented great increases in market value (48.48 % and 51.39 %, respectively) compared with that of monoculture systems. Ecosystem provisioning and gas regulating services increased alongside market benefits over longer cultivation periods, indicating potential advantages of long-term paddy cultivation. After 50 years of operation, the cumulative benefit of the CSMC system was approximately 455058.88 ¥ ha−1, which was approximately 1.6 times greater than the control. These results indicate that additional investment in the CSMC system can produce a high margin benefit-cost ratio (MBCR). Given appropriate management models and policies, CSMC inputs and rice-fish co-culture represent the best-performing reclamation system in this study. Our study lays the foundation for associated studies on related government policy, corporate investments, and agricultural production.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101682
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoser_2024_101682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2212041624000895</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2212041624000895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-3104bc65931b1ddf4df578e348c2a12aa45bdc9296613dd48f3f5e91a72d3e603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQxoMoWGrfwENeYGsmm93uXgQp9Q8UvOg5ZDMTTNnuliQWCj68qevBk6cZvuH7zczH2C2IJQio73ZLsmOksJRCqh-pkRdsJiXIQiioL__012wR404IAbBSrapn7GuTzaeYaM8z4-gtRW4G5FlNBTlHNvkj8Y4Gcj5F7sK45-mDeCDbm71Jfhz46Hg0vR-IxxG95f2Z8DkgBY4-MwINiR8M4ok7Tz3yaWO8YVfO9JEWv3XO3h83b-vnYvv69LJ-2BYWmioVJQjV2bpqS-gA0Sl01aqhUjVWGpDGqKpD28q2rqFEVI0rXUUtmJXEkmpRzpmauDaMMQZy-hD83oSTBqHPiemdnkLU5xD1FGK23U82yrcdfZ5G62mwhD5_nzSO_n_AN_MrfyY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecosystem services and cost-effective benefits from the reclamation of saline sodic land under different paddy field systems</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Zhou, Tairan ; Hu, Hao ; Hu, Jiaxin ; Yang, Ziye ; Lv, Qilin ; Wang, Yajun ; Yan, Binwei ; Ren, Xueqin ; Hu, Shuwen</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Tairan ; Hu, Hao ; Hu, Jiaxin ; Yang, Ziye ; Lv, Qilin ; Wang, Yajun ; Yan, Binwei ; Ren, Xueqin ; Hu, Shuwen</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted] •Assessed the market and non-market benefits, costs, and benefit-cost ratios of different paddy systems.•Reclaiming saline-sodic soils can relieve food shortages and enhance ecosystem services.•Rice-crab and rice-fish co-culture systems had the highest market value.•Ecosystem service values increased with market benefits over extended cultivation periods. Reclamation of saline-sodic soils can unlock vast potential resources, relieve food shortages, and increase valuable ecosystem services. While previous investigations have focused on the current ecosystem service (ES) value of reclaimed paddy fields, the potential long-term costs and benefits of reclamation are still largely unknown. To fill this important research gap, we assessed ES values of reclaimed paddies at the field scale, using primary data collected from 15 different paddy management systems. We assessed the market and non-market benefits, costs, and benefit-cost ratios (BCR) of three different reclamation models and two coculture models across a chronosequence of paddy sites (cultivated for up to 50 years). Our results demonstrate that the addition of cellulose sulfonated modified composite (CSMC) and flue gas desulfurization gypsum (FGDG) substantially increased the net ecosystem service value (NESV) by 16.53 % and 52.21 %, respectively, compared to control paddy cultivation sites. Additionally, integrated rice-crab and rice-fish coculture systems presented great increases in market value (48.48 % and 51.39 %, respectively) compared with that of monoculture systems. Ecosystem provisioning and gas regulating services increased alongside market benefits over longer cultivation periods, indicating potential advantages of long-term paddy cultivation. After 50 years of operation, the cumulative benefit of the CSMC system was approximately 455058.88 ¥ ha−1, which was approximately 1.6 times greater than the control. These results indicate that additional investment in the CSMC system can produce a high margin benefit-cost ratio (MBCR). Given appropriate management models and policies, CSMC inputs and rice-fish co-culture represent the best-performing reclamation system in this study. Our study lays the foundation for associated studies on related government policy, corporate investments, and agricultural production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2212-0416</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2212-0416</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101682</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Benefit-cost analysis ; Ecosystem services ; Reclamation ; Rice paddy ; Saline-sodic soils</subject><ispartof>Ecosystem services, 2024-12, Vol.70, p.101682, Article 101682</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-3104bc65931b1ddf4df578e348c2a12aa45bdc9296613dd48f3f5e91a72d3e603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Tairan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jiaxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ziye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Qilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yajun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Binwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xueqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Shuwen</creatorcontrib><title>Ecosystem services and cost-effective benefits from the reclamation of saline sodic land under different paddy field systems</title><title>Ecosystem services</title><description>[Display omitted] •Assessed the market and non-market benefits, costs, and benefit-cost ratios of different paddy systems.•Reclaiming saline-sodic soils can relieve food shortages and enhance ecosystem services.•Rice-crab and rice-fish co-culture systems had the highest market value.•Ecosystem service values increased with market benefits over extended cultivation periods. Reclamation of saline-sodic soils can unlock vast potential resources, relieve food shortages, and increase valuable ecosystem services. While previous investigations have focused on the current ecosystem service (ES) value of reclaimed paddy fields, the potential long-term costs and benefits of reclamation are still largely unknown. To fill this important research gap, we assessed ES values of reclaimed paddies at the field scale, using primary data collected from 15 different paddy management systems. We assessed the market and non-market benefits, costs, and benefit-cost ratios (BCR) of three different reclamation models and two coculture models across a chronosequence of paddy sites (cultivated for up to 50 years). Our results demonstrate that the addition of cellulose sulfonated modified composite (CSMC) and flue gas desulfurization gypsum (FGDG) substantially increased the net ecosystem service value (NESV) by 16.53 % and 52.21 %, respectively, compared to control paddy cultivation sites. Additionally, integrated rice-crab and rice-fish coculture systems presented great increases in market value (48.48 % and 51.39 %, respectively) compared with that of monoculture systems. Ecosystem provisioning and gas regulating services increased alongside market benefits over longer cultivation periods, indicating potential advantages of long-term paddy cultivation. After 50 years of operation, the cumulative benefit of the CSMC system was approximately 455058.88 ¥ ha−1, which was approximately 1.6 times greater than the control. These results indicate that additional investment in the CSMC system can produce a high margin benefit-cost ratio (MBCR). Given appropriate management models and policies, CSMC inputs and rice-fish co-culture represent the best-performing reclamation system in this study. Our study lays the foundation for associated studies on related government policy, corporate investments, and agricultural production.</description><subject>Benefit-cost analysis</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Reclamation</subject><subject>Rice paddy</subject><subject>Saline-sodic soils</subject><issn>2212-0416</issn><issn>2212-0416</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQxoMoWGrfwENeYGsmm93uXgQp9Q8UvOg5ZDMTTNnuliQWCj68qevBk6cZvuH7zczH2C2IJQio73ZLsmOksJRCqh-pkRdsJiXIQiioL__012wR404IAbBSrapn7GuTzaeYaM8z4-gtRW4G5FlNBTlHNvkj8Y4Gcj5F7sK45-mDeCDbm71Jfhz46Hg0vR-IxxG95f2Z8DkgBY4-MwINiR8M4ok7Tz3yaWO8YVfO9JEWv3XO3h83b-vnYvv69LJ-2BYWmioVJQjV2bpqS-gA0Sl01aqhUjVWGpDGqKpD28q2rqFEVI0rXUUtmJXEkmpRzpmauDaMMQZy-hD83oSTBqHPiemdnkLU5xD1FGK23U82yrcdfZ5G62mwhD5_nzSO_n_AN_MrfyY</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Zhou, Tairan</creator><creator>Hu, Hao</creator><creator>Hu, Jiaxin</creator><creator>Yang, Ziye</creator><creator>Lv, Qilin</creator><creator>Wang, Yajun</creator><creator>Yan, Binwei</creator><creator>Ren, Xueqin</creator><creator>Hu, Shuwen</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Ecosystem services and cost-effective benefits from the reclamation of saline sodic land under different paddy field systems</title><author>Zhou, Tairan ; Hu, Hao ; Hu, Jiaxin ; Yang, Ziye ; Lv, Qilin ; Wang, Yajun ; Yan, Binwei ; Ren, Xueqin ; Hu, Shuwen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-3104bc65931b1ddf4df578e348c2a12aa45bdc9296613dd48f3f5e91a72d3e603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Benefit-cost analysis</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Reclamation</topic><topic>Rice paddy</topic><topic>Saline-sodic soils</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Tairan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jiaxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Ziye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lv, Qilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yajun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Binwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xueqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Shuwen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Ecosystem services</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, Tairan</au><au>Hu, Hao</au><au>Hu, Jiaxin</au><au>Yang, Ziye</au><au>Lv, Qilin</au><au>Wang, Yajun</au><au>Yan, Binwei</au><au>Ren, Xueqin</au><au>Hu, Shuwen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecosystem services and cost-effective benefits from the reclamation of saline sodic land under different paddy field systems</atitle><jtitle>Ecosystem services</jtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>70</volume><spage>101682</spage><pages>101682-</pages><artnum>101682</artnum><issn>2212-0416</issn><eissn>2212-0416</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted] •Assessed the market and non-market benefits, costs, and benefit-cost ratios of different paddy systems.•Reclaiming saline-sodic soils can relieve food shortages and enhance ecosystem services.•Rice-crab and rice-fish co-culture systems had the highest market value.•Ecosystem service values increased with market benefits over extended cultivation periods. Reclamation of saline-sodic soils can unlock vast potential resources, relieve food shortages, and increase valuable ecosystem services. While previous investigations have focused on the current ecosystem service (ES) value of reclaimed paddy fields, the potential long-term costs and benefits of reclamation are still largely unknown. To fill this important research gap, we assessed ES values of reclaimed paddies at the field scale, using primary data collected from 15 different paddy management systems. We assessed the market and non-market benefits, costs, and benefit-cost ratios (BCR) of three different reclamation models and two coculture models across a chronosequence of paddy sites (cultivated for up to 50 years). Our results demonstrate that the addition of cellulose sulfonated modified composite (CSMC) and flue gas desulfurization gypsum (FGDG) substantially increased the net ecosystem service value (NESV) by 16.53 % and 52.21 %, respectively, compared to control paddy cultivation sites. Additionally, integrated rice-crab and rice-fish coculture systems presented great increases in market value (48.48 % and 51.39 %, respectively) compared with that of monoculture systems. Ecosystem provisioning and gas regulating services increased alongside market benefits over longer cultivation periods, indicating potential advantages of long-term paddy cultivation. After 50 years of operation, the cumulative benefit of the CSMC system was approximately 455058.88 ¥ ha−1, which was approximately 1.6 times greater than the control. These results indicate that additional investment in the CSMC system can produce a high margin benefit-cost ratio (MBCR). Given appropriate management models and policies, CSMC inputs and rice-fish co-culture represent the best-performing reclamation system in this study. Our study lays the foundation for associated studies on related government policy, corporate investments, and agricultural production.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101682</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2212-0416
ispartof Ecosystem services, 2024-12, Vol.70, p.101682, Article 101682
issn 2212-0416
2212-0416
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoser_2024_101682
source Elsevier
subjects Benefit-cost analysis
Ecosystem services
Reclamation
Rice paddy
Saline-sodic soils
title Ecosystem services and cost-effective benefits from the reclamation of saline sodic land under different paddy field systems
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A57%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecosystem%20services%20and%20cost-effective%20benefits%20from%20the%20reclamation%20of%20saline%20sodic%20land%20under%20different%20paddy%20field%20systems&rft.jtitle=Ecosystem%20services&rft.au=Zhou,%20Tairan&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=70&rft.spage=101682&rft.pages=101682-&rft.artnum=101682&rft.issn=2212-0416&rft.eissn=2212-0416&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101682&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES2212041624000895%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-3104bc65931b1ddf4df578e348c2a12aa45bdc9296613dd48f3f5e91a72d3e603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true