An overview of simulation tools for predicting the mean radiant temperature in an outdoor space

When modelling outdoor microclimates, researchers and designers need to be aware of the modelling capabilities and limitations of tools. This comparative study attempts to understand how tools such as CitySim Pro, ENVI-met, RayMan, Grasshopper plug-ins Honeybee / Ladybug and Autodesk CFD, evaluate t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy procedia 2017-09, Vol.122, p.1111-1116
Main Authors: Naboni, Emanuele, Meloni, Marco, Coccolo, Silvia, Kaempf, Jérôme, Scartezzini, Jean-Louis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Human Comfort
Mean Radiant Temperature
Outdoor Comfort Simulation
Outdoor Simulation Tools
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:When modelling outdoor microclimates, researchers and designers need to be aware of the modelling capabilities and limitations of tools. This comparative study attempts to understand how tools such as CitySim Pro, ENVI-met, RayMan, Grasshopper plug-ins Honeybee / Ladybug and Autodesk CFD, evaluate the Mean Radiant Temperature (MRT), one of the main parameters governing human energy balance. To this purpose, the space underneath and surrounding the Rolex Learning Center, located on the EPFL campus in Lausanne, were modelled. Significant variations of MRT predictions were recorded. This led to the review of the physical modelling assumptions that each of the calculation engines operates. Based on the tools’ available documentation, answers to forums, interviews with the developers, and tool codes, the paper lists how all the variables that affect MRT are considered. Although not exhaustively, the paper lists the main differences among tools, leading to the understanding of the types of physical context that they could simulate.
ISSN:1876-6102
1876-6102
DOI:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.471