Characteristic ‘fingerprints’ of crop model responses to weather input data at different spatial resolutions

• Published in: European journal of agronomy 2013-08, Vol.49, p.104-114
• Main Authors: Angulo, Carlos, Rötter, Reimund, Trnka, Mirek, Pirttioja, Nina, Gaiser, Thomas, Hlavinka, Petr, Ewert, Frank
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aggregation; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions; Biological and medical sciences; Crop model; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Weather data resolution; Yield distribution
• ISSN: 1161-0301; 1873-7331
• DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2013.04.003

•A systematic analysis was performed of the influence of different spatial weather data resolutions on simulated regional yields.•The responses of four crop models of different complexity were compared.•Differences between models were larger than the effect of the chosen spatial weather data resolution.•Models showed different characteristic ‘fingerprints’ of simulated yield frequency distributions independent of resolution. Crop growth simulation models are increasingly used for regionally assessing the effects of climate change and variability on crop yields. These models require spatially and temporally detailed, location-specific, environmental (weather and soil) and management data as inputs, which are often difficult to obtain consistently for larger regions. Aggregating the resolution of input data for crop model applications may increase the uncertainty of simulations to an extent that is not well understood. The present study aims to systematically analyse the effect of changes in the spatial resolution of weather input data on yields simulated by four crop models (LINTUL-SLIM, DSSAT-CSM, EPIC and WOFOST) which were utilized to test possible interactions between weather input data resolution and specific modelling approaches representing different degrees of complexity. The models were applied to simulate grain yield of spring barley in Finland for 12 years between 1994 and 2005 considering five spatial resolutions of daily weather data: weather station (point) and grid-based interpolated data at resolutions of 10km×10km; 20km×20km; 50km×50km and 100km×100km. Our results show that the differences between models were larger than the effect of the chosen spatial resolution of weather data for the considered years and region. When displaying model results graphically, each model exhibits a characteristic ‘fingerprint’ of simulated yield frequency distributions. These characteristic distributions in response to the inter-annual weather variability were independent of the spatial resolution of weather input data. Using one model (LINTUL-SLIM), we analysed how the aggregation strategy, i.e. aggregating model input versus model output data, influences the simulated yield frequency distribution. Results show that aggregating weather data has a smaller effect on the yield distribution than aggregating simulated yields which causes a deformation of the model fingerprint. We conclude that changes in the spatial resolution of weather input data introduce less