Loading…

Banana leaf pruning to facilitate annual legume intercropping as an intensification strategy in the East African highlands

•Increasing banana leaf pruning levels progressively reduced banana performance while increasing legume yields.•Legume intercrops with high biomass (e.g. climbing beans) reduced banana performance.•Land-use efficiency was reduced by severe banana leaf pruning (i.e. retaining 4 leaves) but improved b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of agronomy 2019-10, Vol.110, p.125923, Article 125923
Main Authors: Ocimati, W., Ntamwira, J., Groot, J.C.J., Taulya, G., Tittonell, P., Dhed’a, B., van Asten, P., Vanlauwe, B., Ruhigwa, B., Blomme, G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-502cf6e668305aafb5371afcac48c95bf3c3c2b65b031a1597f21f3e8f22fef63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-502cf6e668305aafb5371afcac48c95bf3c3c2b65b031a1597f21f3e8f22fef63
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 125923
container_title European journal of agronomy
container_volume 110
creator Ocimati, W.
Ntamwira, J.
Groot, J.C.J.
Taulya, G.
Tittonell, P.
Dhed’a, B.
van Asten, P.
Vanlauwe, B.
Ruhigwa, B.
Blomme, G.
description •Increasing banana leaf pruning levels progressively reduced banana performance while increasing legume yields.•Legume intercrops with high biomass (e.g. climbing beans) reduced banana performance.•Land-use efficiency was reduced by severe banana leaf pruning (i.e. retaining 4 leaves) but improved by moderate pruning.•The un-pruned banana monocrops had the highest labor and overall economic efficiency.•The decision to prune or not, to integrate legumes was thus trade-off between agronomic and economic efficiency. Banana leaf pruning is a common practice to facilitate intercropping with legumes on farmers’ fields. It is however not clear if this practice improves farmers land-use and economic efficiency, especially after full canopy formation. To analyze pruning effects, three legumes viz. bush bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L), climbing bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) and soybean (Glycine max), were planted under three banana leaf pruning levels in which four, seven and all fully grown leaves were retained. Sole banana or legume plots served as controls. Each treatment combination was replicated three times. Banana growth and yield attributes were measured for the plant and first ratoon crops while legume biomass and yields determined over five consecutive cropping seasons. Significant (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eja.2019.125923
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eja_2019_125923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1161030119300644</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1161030119300644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-502cf6e668305aafb5371afcac48c95bf3c3c2b65b031a1597f21f3e8f22fef63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEqXwAez8Awkeu85DrEpVHlIlNrC2Jq6dOkqdyHaRytfjUtZoFjOaO3d0dbLsHmgBFMqHvtA9FoxCUwATDeMX2QzqiucV53CZZighp5zCdXYTQk8prZlYzLLvJ3SpyKDRkMkfnHUdiSMxqOxgI0ZN0LkDDumiO-w1sS5qr_w4TadLDEn-3blgjVUY7ehIiD4Zu2MSSNxpssYQydL4pDuys91uQLcNt9mVwSHou78-zz6f1x-r13zz_vK2Wm5yxZoq5oIyZUpdljWnAtG0gleARqFa1KoRreGKK9aWoqUcEERTGQaG69owZrQp-TyD89-UOgSvjZy83aM_SqDyBE_2MsGTJ3jyDC95Hs8enYJ9We1lUFY7pbfWaxXldrT_uH8Au7p6Ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Banana leaf pruning to facilitate annual legume intercropping as an intensification strategy in the East African highlands</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Ocimati, W. ; Ntamwira, J. ; Groot, J.C.J. ; Taulya, G. ; Tittonell, P. ; Dhed’a, B. ; van Asten, P. ; Vanlauwe, B. ; Ruhigwa, B. ; Blomme, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ocimati, W. ; Ntamwira, J. ; Groot, J.C.J. ; Taulya, G. ; Tittonell, P. ; Dhed’a, B. ; van Asten, P. ; Vanlauwe, B. ; Ruhigwa, B. ; Blomme, G.</creatorcontrib><description>•Increasing banana leaf pruning levels progressively reduced banana performance while increasing legume yields.•Legume intercrops with high biomass (e.g. climbing beans) reduced banana performance.•Land-use efficiency was reduced by severe banana leaf pruning (i.e. retaining 4 leaves) but improved by moderate pruning.•The un-pruned banana monocrops had the highest labor and overall economic efficiency.•The decision to prune or not, to integrate legumes was thus trade-off between agronomic and economic efficiency. Banana leaf pruning is a common practice to facilitate intercropping with legumes on farmers’ fields. It is however not clear if this practice improves farmers land-use and economic efficiency, especially after full canopy formation. To analyze pruning effects, three legumes viz. bush bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L), climbing bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) and soybean (Glycine max), were planted under three banana leaf pruning levels in which four, seven and all fully grown leaves were retained. Sole banana or legume plots served as controls. Each treatment combination was replicated three times. Banana growth and yield attributes were measured for the plant and first ratoon crops while legume biomass and yields determined over five consecutive cropping seasons. Significant (P &lt; 0.001) reductions in banana growth and yield were associated with leaf pruning. Banana yield reductions of 31% and 10% for the four- and seven-leaf retention treatments, respectively occurred. The vigorous intercrops (climbing beans and soybeans) more often depressed the growth and yield of banana. Legume grain and biomass yields increased with leaf pruning levels. Weed biomass and associated management costs increased with decline in shade intensity. The land-use efficiency measured using the land equivalence ratio (LER) was far lower in the treatment with four-leaves (1.10) compared to when all leaves were retained (1.4) but higher (1.54) for the seven-leaf treatment. Severe banana leaf pruning could thus be detrimental to banana performance and inefficient. Moderate banana leaf pruning could however be promoted were land is limiting and farmers want to maximize diversity/nutrition. However, the highest values for gross revenue and benefit-cost ratio were realized for sole banana-all-leaf retention treatment due to a higher labor productivity and lower input costs attributed to the perennial nature of banana. The higher economic efficiency in sole banana plots suggests that reliance on LER only may be insufficient for guiding intercropping decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1161-0301</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7331</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2019.125923</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Banana ; Intercrop ; Leaf pruning ; Legume ; LER ; Revenue</subject><ispartof>European journal of agronomy, 2019-10, Vol.110, p.125923, Article 125923</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-502cf6e668305aafb5371afcac48c95bf3c3c2b65b031a1597f21f3e8f22fef63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-502cf6e668305aafb5371afcac48c95bf3c3c2b65b031a1597f21f3e8f22fef63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6177-7073 ; 0000-0001-6516-5170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ocimati, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ntamwira, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groot, J.C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taulya, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tittonell, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhed’a, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Asten, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanlauwe, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruhigwa, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blomme, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Banana leaf pruning to facilitate annual legume intercropping as an intensification strategy in the East African highlands</title><title>European journal of agronomy</title><description>•Increasing banana leaf pruning levels progressively reduced banana performance while increasing legume yields.•Legume intercrops with high biomass (e.g. climbing beans) reduced banana performance.•Land-use efficiency was reduced by severe banana leaf pruning (i.e. retaining 4 leaves) but improved by moderate pruning.•The un-pruned banana monocrops had the highest labor and overall economic efficiency.•The decision to prune or not, to integrate legumes was thus trade-off between agronomic and economic efficiency. Banana leaf pruning is a common practice to facilitate intercropping with legumes on farmers’ fields. It is however not clear if this practice improves farmers land-use and economic efficiency, especially after full canopy formation. To analyze pruning effects, three legumes viz. bush bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L), climbing bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) and soybean (Glycine max), were planted under three banana leaf pruning levels in which four, seven and all fully grown leaves were retained. Sole banana or legume plots served as controls. Each treatment combination was replicated three times. Banana growth and yield attributes were measured for the plant and first ratoon crops while legume biomass and yields determined over five consecutive cropping seasons. Significant (P &lt; 0.001) reductions in banana growth and yield were associated with leaf pruning. Banana yield reductions of 31% and 10% for the four- and seven-leaf retention treatments, respectively occurred. The vigorous intercrops (climbing beans and soybeans) more often depressed the growth and yield of banana. Legume grain and biomass yields increased with leaf pruning levels. Weed biomass and associated management costs increased with decline in shade intensity. The land-use efficiency measured using the land equivalence ratio (LER) was far lower in the treatment with four-leaves (1.10) compared to when all leaves were retained (1.4) but higher (1.54) for the seven-leaf treatment. Severe banana leaf pruning could thus be detrimental to banana performance and inefficient. Moderate banana leaf pruning could however be promoted were land is limiting and farmers want to maximize diversity/nutrition. However, the highest values for gross revenue and benefit-cost ratio were realized for sole banana-all-leaf retention treatment due to a higher labor productivity and lower input costs attributed to the perennial nature of banana. The higher economic efficiency in sole banana plots suggests that reliance on LER only may be insufficient for guiding intercropping decisions.</description><subject>Banana</subject><subject>Intercrop</subject><subject>Leaf pruning</subject><subject>Legume</subject><subject>LER</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><issn>1161-0301</issn><issn>1873-7331</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEqXwAez8Awkeu85DrEpVHlIlNrC2Jq6dOkqdyHaRytfjUtZoFjOaO3d0dbLsHmgBFMqHvtA9FoxCUwATDeMX2QzqiucV53CZZighp5zCdXYTQk8prZlYzLLvJ3SpyKDRkMkfnHUdiSMxqOxgI0ZN0LkDDumiO-w1sS5qr_w4TadLDEn-3blgjVUY7ehIiD4Zu2MSSNxpssYQydL4pDuys91uQLcNt9mVwSHou78-zz6f1x-r13zz_vK2Wm5yxZoq5oIyZUpdljWnAtG0gleARqFa1KoRreGKK9aWoqUcEERTGQaG69owZrQp-TyD89-UOgSvjZy83aM_SqDyBE_2MsGTJ3jyDC95Hs8enYJ9We1lUFY7pbfWaxXldrT_uH8Au7p6Ng</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Ocimati, W.</creator><creator>Ntamwira, J.</creator><creator>Groot, J.C.J.</creator><creator>Taulya, G.</creator><creator>Tittonell, P.</creator><creator>Dhed’a, B.</creator><creator>van Asten, P.</creator><creator>Vanlauwe, B.</creator><creator>Ruhigwa, B.</creator><creator>Blomme, G.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6177-7073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6516-5170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Banana leaf pruning to facilitate annual legume intercropping as an intensification strategy in the East African highlands</title><author>Ocimati, W. ; Ntamwira, J. ; Groot, J.C.J. ; Taulya, G. ; Tittonell, P. ; Dhed’a, B. ; van Asten, P. ; Vanlauwe, B. ; Ruhigwa, B. ; Blomme, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-502cf6e668305aafb5371afcac48c95bf3c3c2b65b031a1597f21f3e8f22fef63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Banana</topic><topic>Intercrop</topic><topic>Leaf pruning</topic><topic>Legume</topic><topic>LER</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ocimati, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ntamwira, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groot, J.C.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taulya, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tittonell, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhed’a, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Asten, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanlauwe, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruhigwa, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blomme, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European journal of agronomy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ocimati, W.</au><au>Ntamwira, J.</au><au>Groot, J.C.J.</au><au>Taulya, G.</au><au>Tittonell, P.</au><au>Dhed’a, B.</au><au>van Asten, P.</au><au>Vanlauwe, B.</au><au>Ruhigwa, B.</au><au>Blomme, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Banana leaf pruning to facilitate annual legume intercropping as an intensification strategy in the East African highlands</atitle><jtitle>European journal of agronomy</jtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>110</volume><spage>125923</spage><pages>125923-</pages><artnum>125923</artnum><issn>1161-0301</issn><eissn>1873-7331</eissn><abstract>•Increasing banana leaf pruning levels progressively reduced banana performance while increasing legume yields.•Legume intercrops with high biomass (e.g. climbing beans) reduced banana performance.•Land-use efficiency was reduced by severe banana leaf pruning (i.e. retaining 4 leaves) but improved by moderate pruning.•The un-pruned banana monocrops had the highest labor and overall economic efficiency.•The decision to prune or not, to integrate legumes was thus trade-off between agronomic and economic efficiency. Banana leaf pruning is a common practice to facilitate intercropping with legumes on farmers’ fields. It is however not clear if this practice improves farmers land-use and economic efficiency, especially after full canopy formation. To analyze pruning effects, three legumes viz. bush bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L), climbing bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) and soybean (Glycine max), were planted under three banana leaf pruning levels in which four, seven and all fully grown leaves were retained. Sole banana or legume plots served as controls. Each treatment combination was replicated three times. Banana growth and yield attributes were measured for the plant and first ratoon crops while legume biomass and yields determined over five consecutive cropping seasons. Significant (P &lt; 0.001) reductions in banana growth and yield were associated with leaf pruning. Banana yield reductions of 31% and 10% for the four- and seven-leaf retention treatments, respectively occurred. The vigorous intercrops (climbing beans and soybeans) more often depressed the growth and yield of banana. Legume grain and biomass yields increased with leaf pruning levels. Weed biomass and associated management costs increased with decline in shade intensity. The land-use efficiency measured using the land equivalence ratio (LER) was far lower in the treatment with four-leaves (1.10) compared to when all leaves were retained (1.4) but higher (1.54) for the seven-leaf treatment. Severe banana leaf pruning could thus be detrimental to banana performance and inefficient. Moderate banana leaf pruning could however be promoted were land is limiting and farmers want to maximize diversity/nutrition. However, the highest values for gross revenue and benefit-cost ratio were realized for sole banana-all-leaf retention treatment due to a higher labor productivity and lower input costs attributed to the perennial nature of banana. The higher economic efficiency in sole banana plots suggests that reliance on LER only may be insufficient for guiding intercropping decisions.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eja.2019.125923</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6177-7073</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6516-5170</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1161-0301
ispartof European journal of agronomy, 2019-10, Vol.110, p.125923, Article 125923
issn 1161-0301
1873-7331
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eja_2019_125923
source Elsevier
subjects Banana
Intercrop
Leaf pruning
Legume
LER
Revenue
title Banana leaf pruning to facilitate annual legume intercropping as an intensification strategy in the East African highlands
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T20%3A19%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Banana%20leaf%20pruning%20to%20facilitate%20annual%20legume%20intercropping%20as%20an%20intensification%20strategy%20in%20the%20East%20African%20highlands&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20agronomy&rft.au=Ocimati,%20W.&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=110&rft.spage=125923&rft.pages=125923-&rft.artnum=125923&rft.issn=1161-0301&rft.eissn=1873-7331&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eja.2019.125923&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES1161030119300644%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-502cf6e668305aafb5371afcac48c95bf3c3c2b65b031a1597f21f3e8f22fef63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true