Loading…

Leaders, factions and the determinants of electoral success

We model the internal game between the leader and the factions of a party, to study the effect of party leadership on the determinants of electoral success. Factions are of interest or of principle. The probability of winning the election is increasing in how close the party is to the median voter,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European Journal of Political Economy 2023-12, Vol.80, p.102450, Article 102450
Main Authors: Crutzen, Benoît S.Y., Flamand, Sabine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-19a4529fbfe08050d8c78d5a92a07cbd927dfc845371c7a71517d4f9daf7443a3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102450
container_title European Journal of Political Economy
container_volume 80
creator Crutzen, Benoît S.Y.
Flamand, Sabine
description We model the internal game between the leader and the factions of a party, to study the effect of party leadership on the determinants of electoral success. Factions are of interest or of principle. The probability of winning the election is increasing in how close the party is to the median voter, the leader’s charisma, party coherence and the factions’ contributions. The leader offers both types of factions their favourite rewards in exchange for contributions. We show that party coherence and factions’ contributions are not necessarily increasing in the leader’s charisma and ideological proximity to factions. Further, we show that factions of interest constraint the party’s electoral strategy less than factions of principle. In particular, factions of interest always contribute more, are less of an obstacle towards achieving party coherence, and offer the party more freedom in its choice of the ideological location and charisma of the party leader. •We study the exchange between the leader and the factions of a party to understand the determinants of electoral success.•The leader is authority charismatic or not. Their ideology is that of the party. Factions are of interest or principle.•Voters value charismatic leaders, ideological proximity to leaders, intraparty coherence and factional contributions.•We show that factions of interest contribute more to party work and party coherence is easier to achieve with such factions.•The party tracks more easily the median voter’s position or the ideological location of factions if these are of interest.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102450
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejpoleco_2023_102450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0176268023000940</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0176268023000940</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-19a4529fbfe08050d8c78d5a92a07cbd927dfc845371c7a71517d4f9daf7443a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1KAzEQx4MoWGpfQfIAbp18bTZ4UYpWoeBFzyFNJpil3ZRkFXx7t1TPzmVg4P8xP0KuGSwZsPa2X2J_yDv0ecmBi-nIpYIzMmOdFo3SIM7JDJhuG952cEkWtfYwjTS8M2JG7jboApZ6Q6PzY8pDpW4IdPxAGnDEsk-DG8ZKc6Q4pYy5uB2tn95jrVfkIrpdxcXvnpP3p8e31XOzeV2_rB42jRcSxoYZJxU3cRsROlAQOq-7oJzhDrTfBsN1iL6TSmjmtdNMMR1kNMFFLaVwYk7ak68vudaC0R5K2rvybRnYIwXb2z8K9kjBnihMwvuTEKd2XwmLrT7h4DGkMv1iQ07_WfwAiZlo3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Leaders, factions and the determinants of electoral success</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Crutzen, Benoît S.Y. ; Flamand, Sabine</creator><creatorcontrib>Crutzen, Benoît S.Y. ; Flamand, Sabine</creatorcontrib><description>We model the internal game between the leader and the factions of a party, to study the effect of party leadership on the determinants of electoral success. Factions are of interest or of principle. The probability of winning the election is increasing in how close the party is to the median voter, the leader’s charisma, party coherence and the factions’ contributions. The leader offers both types of factions their favourite rewards in exchange for contributions. We show that party coherence and factions’ contributions are not necessarily increasing in the leader’s charisma and ideological proximity to factions. Further, we show that factions of interest constraint the party’s electoral strategy less than factions of principle. In particular, factions of interest always contribute more, are less of an obstacle towards achieving party coherence, and offer the party more freedom in its choice of the ideological location and charisma of the party leader. •We study the exchange between the leader and the factions of a party to understand the determinants of electoral success.•The leader is authority charismatic or not. Their ideology is that of the party. Factions are of interest or principle.•Voters value charismatic leaders, ideological proximity to leaders, intraparty coherence and factional contributions.•We show that factions of interest contribute more to party work and party coherence is easier to achieve with such factions.•The party tracks more easily the median voter’s position or the ideological location of factions if these are of interest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0176-2680</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Electoral success ; Factions ; Intra-party politics ; Leaders</subject><ispartof>European Journal of Political Economy, 2023-12, Vol.80, p.102450, Article 102450</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-19a4529fbfe08050d8c78d5a92a07cbd927dfc845371c7a71517d4f9daf7443a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5671-7612</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27900,27901</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crutzen, Benoît S.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flamand, Sabine</creatorcontrib><title>Leaders, factions and the determinants of electoral success</title><title>European Journal of Political Economy</title><description>We model the internal game between the leader and the factions of a party, to study the effect of party leadership on the determinants of electoral success. Factions are of interest or of principle. The probability of winning the election is increasing in how close the party is to the median voter, the leader’s charisma, party coherence and the factions’ contributions. The leader offers both types of factions their favourite rewards in exchange for contributions. We show that party coherence and factions’ contributions are not necessarily increasing in the leader’s charisma and ideological proximity to factions. Further, we show that factions of interest constraint the party’s electoral strategy less than factions of principle. In particular, factions of interest always contribute more, are less of an obstacle towards achieving party coherence, and offer the party more freedom in its choice of the ideological location and charisma of the party leader. •We study the exchange between the leader and the factions of a party to understand the determinants of electoral success.•The leader is authority charismatic or not. Their ideology is that of the party. Factions are of interest or principle.•Voters value charismatic leaders, ideological proximity to leaders, intraparty coherence and factional contributions.•We show that factions of interest contribute more to party work and party coherence is easier to achieve with such factions.•The party tracks more easily the median voter’s position or the ideological location of factions if these are of interest.</description><subject>Electoral success</subject><subject>Factions</subject><subject>Intra-party politics</subject><subject>Leaders</subject><issn>0176-2680</issn><issn>1873-5703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1KAzEQx4MoWGpfQfIAbp18bTZ4UYpWoeBFzyFNJpil3ZRkFXx7t1TPzmVg4P8xP0KuGSwZsPa2X2J_yDv0ecmBi-nIpYIzMmOdFo3SIM7JDJhuG952cEkWtfYwjTS8M2JG7jboApZ6Q6PzY8pDpW4IdPxAGnDEsk-DG8ZKc6Q4pYy5uB2tn95jrVfkIrpdxcXvnpP3p8e31XOzeV2_rB42jRcSxoYZJxU3cRsROlAQOq-7oJzhDrTfBsN1iL6TSmjmtdNMMR1kNMFFLaVwYk7ak68vudaC0R5K2rvybRnYIwXb2z8K9kjBnihMwvuTEKd2XwmLrT7h4DGkMv1iQ07_WfwAiZlo3A</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Crutzen, Benoît S.Y.</creator><creator>Flamand, Sabine</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5671-7612</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Leaders, factions and the determinants of electoral success</title><author>Crutzen, Benoît S.Y. ; Flamand, Sabine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-19a4529fbfe08050d8c78d5a92a07cbd927dfc845371c7a71517d4f9daf7443a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Electoral success</topic><topic>Factions</topic><topic>Intra-party politics</topic><topic>Leaders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crutzen, Benoît S.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flamand, Sabine</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European Journal of Political Economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crutzen, Benoît S.Y.</au><au>Flamand, Sabine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Leaders, factions and the determinants of electoral success</atitle><jtitle>European Journal of Political Economy</jtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>80</volume><spage>102450</spage><pages>102450-</pages><artnum>102450</artnum><issn>0176-2680</issn><eissn>1873-5703</eissn><abstract>We model the internal game between the leader and the factions of a party, to study the effect of party leadership on the determinants of electoral success. Factions are of interest or of principle. The probability of winning the election is increasing in how close the party is to the median voter, the leader’s charisma, party coherence and the factions’ contributions. The leader offers both types of factions their favourite rewards in exchange for contributions. We show that party coherence and factions’ contributions are not necessarily increasing in the leader’s charisma and ideological proximity to factions. Further, we show that factions of interest constraint the party’s electoral strategy less than factions of principle. In particular, factions of interest always contribute more, are less of an obstacle towards achieving party coherence, and offer the party more freedom in its choice of the ideological location and charisma of the party leader. •We study the exchange between the leader and the factions of a party to understand the determinants of electoral success.•The leader is authority charismatic or not. Their ideology is that of the party. Factions are of interest or principle.•Voters value charismatic leaders, ideological proximity to leaders, intraparty coherence and factional contributions.•We show that factions of interest contribute more to party work and party coherence is easier to achieve with such factions.•The party tracks more easily the median voter’s position or the ideological location of factions if these are of interest.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102450</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5671-7612</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0176-2680
ispartof European Journal of Political Economy, 2023-12, Vol.80, p.102450, Article 102450
issn 0176-2680
1873-5703
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejpoleco_2023_102450
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Electoral success
Factions
Intra-party politics
Leaders
title Leaders, factions and the determinants of electoral success
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-25T11%3A15%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leaders,%20factions%20and%20the%20determinants%20of%20electoral%20success&rft.jtitle=European%20Journal%20of%20Political%20Economy&rft.au=Crutzen,%20Beno%C3%AEt%20S.Y.&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=80&rft.spage=102450&rft.pages=102450-&rft.artnum=102450&rft.issn=0176-2680&rft.eissn=1873-5703&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102450&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0176268023000940%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-19a4529fbfe08050d8c78d5a92a07cbd927dfc845371c7a71517d4f9daf7443a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true