Loading…

A prospective cohort evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of the chest X-ray for the detection of lung cancer in symptomatic adults

•The diagnostic accuracy of the CXR in detecting symptomatic lung cancer.•A positive CXR strongly increases the probability of lung cancer being present.•A negative CXR leads to a limited reduction of the probability of lung cancer.•The findings allow the risk of lung cancer following a negative tes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of radiology 2021-11, Vol.144, p.109953, Article 109953
Main Authors: Bhartia, Bobby S.K., Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding, Aslam, Rehima, Bradley, Stephen H., Darby, Michael, Hamilton, William T., Hurst, Emily, Kennedy, Martyn P.T., Mounce, Luke T.A., Neal, Richard D., Shinkins, Bethany, Callister, Matthew E.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-c078e188036932a323b6ba55a169c7ac81aab35abdf609129126da1b431086983
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-c078e188036932a323b6ba55a169c7ac81aab35abdf609129126da1b431086983
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 109953
container_title European journal of radiology
container_volume 144
creator Bhartia, Bobby S.K.
Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding
Aslam, Rehima
Bradley, Stephen H.
Darby, Michael
Hamilton, William T.
Hurst, Emily
Kennedy, Martyn P.T.
Mounce, Luke T.A.
Neal, Richard D.
Shinkins, Bethany
Callister, Matthew E.J.
description •The diagnostic accuracy of the CXR in detecting symptomatic lung cancer.•A positive CXR strongly increases the probability of lung cancer being present.•A negative CXR leads to a limited reduction of the probability of lung cancer.•The findings allow the risk of lung cancer following a negative test to be estimated. The accuracy of the chest x-ray (CXR) in the identification of lung cancer amongst symptomatic individuals is uncertain. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the CXR for the detection of non-small cell carcinomas (NSCLC) and all primary intrathoracic malignancies. A prospective cohort study of consecutive CXR reports obtained within a primary care open access initiative. Eligibility criteria were symptoms specified by National Institute for Clinical Excellence as indicative of possible lung cancer and age over 50-yrs. A positive test was a CXR which led directly or indirectly to investigation with CT. The reference standards were malignancies observed within a one- or two-year post-test period. 8,948 CXR outcomes were evaluated. 496 positive studies led to a diagnosis of 101 patients with primary intrathoracic malignancy including 80 with NSCLC. Within two-years, a cumulative total of 168 patients with primary intrathoracic malignancies including 133 NSCLC were observed. The sensitivity and specificity for NSCLC were 76% (95 %CI 68–84) and 95% (95 %CI 95–96) within 1-year and 60% (95 %CI 52–69) and 95% (95 %CI 95–96) within 2-years. The 2-yr positive and negative likelihood ratios were 12.8 and 0.4. The results did not differ for NSCLC compared to all primary malignancies. Within this symptomatic population a negative test reduced the 2-year risk of lung cancer to 0.8%. A positive test strongly increases the probability of malignancy whereas a negative test does not conclusively exclude the disease. The findings allow the risk of malignancy following a negative test to be estimated.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109953
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2021_109953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X21004344</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0720048X21004344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-c078e188036932a323b6ba55a169c7ac81aab35abdf609129126da1b431086983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtqwzAQFKWFpmm_oBf9gFM9Yls-9BBCXxDopYXcxFqSGxnHMpIS8D_0oysnORcWlh12ZncGoUdKFpTQ4qldmNaDXjDCaEKqKudXaEZFybKyZOU1mpGSkYwsxfYW3YXQEkLyZcVm6HeFB-_CYFS0R4OV2zkfsTlCd4BoXY9dg-PO4GD6YNOKjSOGXuOJYRurpvmyonYmRLzNPIy4cf6EaRMn5bNOd-h_sIJeGY9tj8O4H6LbpzMKgz50Mdyjmwa6YB4ufY6-X1--1u_Z5vPtY73aZIoTHjNFSmGoEIQXFWfAGa-LGvIcaFGpEpSgADXPodZNQSrKUhUaaL3klIiiEnyO-FlXJevBm0YO3u7Bj5ISOQUqW3kKVE6BynOgifV8Zpn02tEaL4OyJrnR1ieTUjv7L_8P5hSCQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A prospective cohort evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of the chest X-ray for the detection of lung cancer in symptomatic adults</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Bhartia, Bobby S.K. ; Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding ; Aslam, Rehima ; Bradley, Stephen H. ; Darby, Michael ; Hamilton, William T. ; Hurst, Emily ; Kennedy, Martyn P.T. ; Mounce, Luke T.A. ; Neal, Richard D. ; Shinkins, Bethany ; Callister, Matthew E.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bhartia, Bobby S.K. ; Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding ; Aslam, Rehima ; Bradley, Stephen H. ; Darby, Michael ; Hamilton, William T. ; Hurst, Emily ; Kennedy, Martyn P.T. ; Mounce, Luke T.A. ; Neal, Richard D. ; Shinkins, Bethany ; Callister, Matthew E.J.</creatorcontrib><description>•The diagnostic accuracy of the CXR in detecting symptomatic lung cancer.•A positive CXR strongly increases the probability of lung cancer being present.•A negative CXR leads to a limited reduction of the probability of lung cancer.•The findings allow the risk of lung cancer following a negative test to be estimated. The accuracy of the chest x-ray (CXR) in the identification of lung cancer amongst symptomatic individuals is uncertain. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the CXR for the detection of non-small cell carcinomas (NSCLC) and all primary intrathoracic malignancies. A prospective cohort study of consecutive CXR reports obtained within a primary care open access initiative. Eligibility criteria were symptoms specified by National Institute for Clinical Excellence as indicative of possible lung cancer and age over 50-yrs. A positive test was a CXR which led directly or indirectly to investigation with CT. The reference standards were malignancies observed within a one- or two-year post-test period. 8,948 CXR outcomes were evaluated. 496 positive studies led to a diagnosis of 101 patients with primary intrathoracic malignancy including 80 with NSCLC. Within two-years, a cumulative total of 168 patients with primary intrathoracic malignancies including 133 NSCLC were observed. The sensitivity and specificity for NSCLC were 76% (95 %CI 68–84) and 95% (95 %CI 95–96) within 1-year and 60% (95 %CI 52–69) and 95% (95 %CI 95–96) within 2-years. The 2-yr positive and negative likelihood ratios were 12.8 and 0.4. The results did not differ for NSCLC compared to all primary malignancies. Within this symptomatic population a negative test reduced the 2-year risk of lung cancer to 0.8%. A positive test strongly increases the probability of malignancy whereas a negative test does not conclusively exclude the disease. The findings allow the risk of malignancy following a negative test to be estimated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109953</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Chest Radiograph ; Diagnostic Accuracy ; Lung Cancer</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2021-11, Vol.144, p.109953, Article 109953</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-c078e188036932a323b6ba55a169c7ac81aab35abdf609129126da1b431086983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-c078e188036932a323b6ba55a169c7ac81aab35abdf609129126da1b431086983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bhartia, Bobby S.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aslam, Rehima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Stephen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darby, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, William T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurst, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Martyn P.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mounce, Luke T.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinkins, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callister, Matthew E.J.</creatorcontrib><title>A prospective cohort evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of the chest X-ray for the detection of lung cancer in symptomatic adults</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><description>•The diagnostic accuracy of the CXR in detecting symptomatic lung cancer.•A positive CXR strongly increases the probability of lung cancer being present.•A negative CXR leads to a limited reduction of the probability of lung cancer.•The findings allow the risk of lung cancer following a negative test to be estimated. The accuracy of the chest x-ray (CXR) in the identification of lung cancer amongst symptomatic individuals is uncertain. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the CXR for the detection of non-small cell carcinomas (NSCLC) and all primary intrathoracic malignancies. A prospective cohort study of consecutive CXR reports obtained within a primary care open access initiative. Eligibility criteria were symptoms specified by National Institute for Clinical Excellence as indicative of possible lung cancer and age over 50-yrs. A positive test was a CXR which led directly or indirectly to investigation with CT. The reference standards were malignancies observed within a one- or two-year post-test period. 8,948 CXR outcomes were evaluated. 496 positive studies led to a diagnosis of 101 patients with primary intrathoracic malignancy including 80 with NSCLC. Within two-years, a cumulative total of 168 patients with primary intrathoracic malignancies including 133 NSCLC were observed. The sensitivity and specificity for NSCLC were 76% (95 %CI 68–84) and 95% (95 %CI 95–96) within 1-year and 60% (95 %CI 52–69) and 95% (95 %CI 95–96) within 2-years. The 2-yr positive and negative likelihood ratios were 12.8 and 0.4. The results did not differ for NSCLC compared to all primary malignancies. Within this symptomatic population a negative test reduced the 2-year risk of lung cancer to 0.8%. A positive test strongly increases the probability of malignancy whereas a negative test does not conclusively exclude the disease. The findings allow the risk of malignancy following a negative test to be estimated.</description><subject>Chest Radiograph</subject><subject>Diagnostic Accuracy</subject><subject>Lung Cancer</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMtqwzAQFKWFpmm_oBf9gFM9Yls-9BBCXxDopYXcxFqSGxnHMpIS8D_0oysnORcWlh12ZncGoUdKFpTQ4qldmNaDXjDCaEKqKudXaEZFybKyZOU1mpGSkYwsxfYW3YXQEkLyZcVm6HeFB-_CYFS0R4OV2zkfsTlCd4BoXY9dg-PO4GD6YNOKjSOGXuOJYRurpvmyonYmRLzNPIy4cf6EaRMn5bNOd-h_sIJeGY9tj8O4H6LbpzMKgz50Mdyjmwa6YB4ufY6-X1--1u_Z5vPtY73aZIoTHjNFSmGoEIQXFWfAGa-LGvIcaFGpEpSgADXPodZNQSrKUhUaaL3klIiiEnyO-FlXJevBm0YO3u7Bj5ISOQUqW3kKVE6BynOgifV8Zpn02tEaL4OyJrnR1ieTUjv7L_8P5hSCQw</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Bhartia, Bobby S.K.</creator><creator>Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding</creator><creator>Aslam, Rehima</creator><creator>Bradley, Stephen H.</creator><creator>Darby, Michael</creator><creator>Hamilton, William T.</creator><creator>Hurst, Emily</creator><creator>Kennedy, Martyn P.T.</creator><creator>Mounce, Luke T.A.</creator><creator>Neal, Richard D.</creator><creator>Shinkins, Bethany</creator><creator>Callister, Matthew E.J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>A prospective cohort evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of the chest X-ray for the detection of lung cancer in symptomatic adults</title><author>Bhartia, Bobby S.K. ; Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding ; Aslam, Rehima ; Bradley, Stephen H. ; Darby, Michael ; Hamilton, William T. ; Hurst, Emily ; Kennedy, Martyn P.T. ; Mounce, Luke T.A. ; Neal, Richard D. ; Shinkins, Bethany ; Callister, Matthew E.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-c078e188036932a323b6ba55a169c7ac81aab35abdf609129126da1b431086983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Chest Radiograph</topic><topic>Diagnostic Accuracy</topic><topic>Lung Cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhartia, Bobby S.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aslam, Rehima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Stephen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darby, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, William T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurst, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Martyn P.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mounce, Luke T.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinkins, Bethany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callister, Matthew E.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhartia, Bobby S.K.</au><au>Hatton, Nathaniel Luke Fielding</au><au>Aslam, Rehima</au><au>Bradley, Stephen H.</au><au>Darby, Michael</au><au>Hamilton, William T.</au><au>Hurst, Emily</au><au>Kennedy, Martyn P.T.</au><au>Mounce, Luke T.A.</au><au>Neal, Richard D.</au><au>Shinkins, Bethany</au><au>Callister, Matthew E.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A prospective cohort evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of the chest X-ray for the detection of lung cancer in symptomatic adults</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>144</volume><spage>109953</spage><pages>109953-</pages><artnum>109953</artnum><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>•The diagnostic accuracy of the CXR in detecting symptomatic lung cancer.•A positive CXR strongly increases the probability of lung cancer being present.•A negative CXR leads to a limited reduction of the probability of lung cancer.•The findings allow the risk of lung cancer following a negative test to be estimated. The accuracy of the chest x-ray (CXR) in the identification of lung cancer amongst symptomatic individuals is uncertain. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the CXR for the detection of non-small cell carcinomas (NSCLC) and all primary intrathoracic malignancies. A prospective cohort study of consecutive CXR reports obtained within a primary care open access initiative. Eligibility criteria were symptoms specified by National Institute for Clinical Excellence as indicative of possible lung cancer and age over 50-yrs. A positive test was a CXR which led directly or indirectly to investigation with CT. The reference standards were malignancies observed within a one- or two-year post-test period. 8,948 CXR outcomes were evaluated. 496 positive studies led to a diagnosis of 101 patients with primary intrathoracic malignancy including 80 with NSCLC. Within two-years, a cumulative total of 168 patients with primary intrathoracic malignancies including 133 NSCLC were observed. The sensitivity and specificity for NSCLC were 76% (95 %CI 68–84) and 95% (95 %CI 95–96) within 1-year and 60% (95 %CI 52–69) and 95% (95 %CI 95–96) within 2-years. The 2-yr positive and negative likelihood ratios were 12.8 and 0.4. The results did not differ for NSCLC compared to all primary malignancies. Within this symptomatic population a negative test reduced the 2-year risk of lung cancer to 0.8%. A positive test strongly increases the probability of malignancy whereas a negative test does not conclusively exclude the disease. The findings allow the risk of malignancy following a negative test to be estimated.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109953</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0720-048X
ispartof European journal of radiology, 2021-11, Vol.144, p.109953, Article 109953
issn 0720-048X
1872-7727
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2021_109953
source Elsevier
subjects Chest Radiograph
Diagnostic Accuracy
Lung Cancer
title A prospective cohort evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of the chest X-ray for the detection of lung cancer in symptomatic adults
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-06T06%3A47%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20prospective%20cohort%20evaluation%20of%20the%20sensitivity%20and%20specificity%20of%20the%20chest%20X-ray%20for%20the%20detection%20of%20lung%20cancer%20in%20symptomatic%20adults&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Bhartia,%20Bobby%20S.K.&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=144&rft.spage=109953&rft.pages=109953-&rft.artnum=109953&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109953&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0720048X21004344%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-c078e188036932a323b6ba55a169c7ac81aab35abdf609129126da1b431086983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true