Historical and contemporary conceptions of trauma-related dissociation: A neo-Janetian critique of models of divided personality

Abstract Both Pierre Janet and the neo-Janetian contemporary theory of structural dissociation of the personality (SDP) view dissociation as inherently pathological – trauma-related dissociation. However, since the late 19th century, other theories have viewed dissociative subsystems of the personal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of trauma & dissociation = Revue europâeenne du trauma et de la dissociation 2020-05, Vol.4 (2), p.100101, Article 100101
Main Authors: Moskowitz, Andrew, van der Hart, Onno
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Dissociation
Hierarchy of degrees of reality
Personality subsystems
Pierre Janet
Psychiatric/Mental Health
Trauma
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Both Pierre Janet and the neo-Janetian contemporary theory of structural dissociation of the personality (SDP) view dissociation as inherently pathological – trauma-related dissociation. However, since the late 19th century, other theories have viewed dissociative subsystems of the personality developing after traumatic experiences as continuous with proposed divisions of normal personality. Taking Pierre Janet's hierarchy of degrees of reality as a guide, along with the basic premises of the theory of structural dissociation of the personality, this paper examines this assumption in constructs from the late 19th through 20th centuries, including ego states, self-states, schema modes and complexes. It is concluded that the SDP concept of dissociative parts of the personality is most consistent with the historical and empirical literature, and that dissociation is best thought of as discontinuous with normal personality.
ISSN:2468-7499
2468-7499
DOI:10.1016/j.ejtd.2019.02.004