Loading…

Free public transit and voter turnout

Transportation costs are an under-studied barrier to political participation. In many elections worldwide, subsidies to voter transportation are already provided or are under discussion. However, these types of incentives have not been rigorously evaluated. Here we examine possibly the world's...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Electoral studies 2023-12, Vol.86, p.102690, Article 102690
Main Authors: Pereira, Rafael H.M., Vieira, Renato S., Bizzarro, Fernando, Barbosa, Rogério J., Dahis, Ricardo, Ferreira, Daniel T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-2e8695af1286ab6c5bff55983ab96b20a4345ad4c35ddfff5dcd76984192e8e73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-2e8695af1286ab6c5bff55983ab96b20a4345ad4c35ddfff5dcd76984192e8e73
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102690
container_title Electoral studies
container_volume 86
creator Pereira, Rafael H.M.
Vieira, Renato S.
Bizzarro, Fernando
Barbosa, Rogério J.
Dahis, Ricardo
Ferreira, Daniel T.
description Transportation costs are an under-studied barrier to political participation. In many elections worldwide, subsidies to voter transportation are already provided or are under discussion. However, these types of incentives have not been rigorously evaluated. Here we examine possibly the world's largest-ever intervention to lower these costs, the adoption of a fare-free public transit policy in Brazil during the 2022 national election, when about half of Brazilian voters were granted the right to use public transit for free on election days. However, while some cities adopted the benefit for both rounds of the election, others adopted it only for the second round. Using an event study design, we exploit this difference in adoption timing to examine the policy's causal impact on voter turnout rates and human mobility levels. We find that fare-free transit increased ridership between 7.2% and 17.5% on election days, however, we estimate a precise and robust null effect of the policy on voter turnout (Coef. −0.03p.p. with standard error of 0.22p.p.). Our results illustrate that monetary transport costs may not always be a critical factor behind non-participation. Although reducing transportation costs improves access to polling places, we show that even a full transit subsidy may not be sufficient to increase voter turnout.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102690
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_electstud_2023_102690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0261379423001129</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0261379423001129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-2e8695af1286ab6c5bff55983ab96b20a4345ad4c35ddfff5dcd76984192e8e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFj01LxDAQhoMoWFd_g714bM1HkybHZXFdYcGLnkOaTCGltkuSLvjvzVLx6mngnXle5kHokeCaYCKehxpGsCmmxdUUU5ZTKhS-QgWRLauEVPgaFTkjFWtVc4vuYhwwJlQpUqCnfQAoT0s3elumYKboU2kmV57nBKFMS5jmJd2jm96MER5-5wZ97l8-dofq-P76ttseK8sITxUFKRQ3PaFSmE5Y3vU950oy0ynRUWwa1nDjGsu4c33eOetaoWRDVEahZRvUrr02zDEG6PUp-C8TvjXB-mKrB_1nqy-2erXN5HYlIb939hB0tB4mC86HfK_d7P_t-AF2X2Io</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Free public transit and voter turnout</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Pereira, Rafael H.M. ; Vieira, Renato S. ; Bizzarro, Fernando ; Barbosa, Rogério J. ; Dahis, Ricardo ; Ferreira, Daniel T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Rafael H.M. ; Vieira, Renato S. ; Bizzarro, Fernando ; Barbosa, Rogério J. ; Dahis, Ricardo ; Ferreira, Daniel T.</creatorcontrib><description>Transportation costs are an under-studied barrier to political participation. In many elections worldwide, subsidies to voter transportation are already provided or are under discussion. However, these types of incentives have not been rigorously evaluated. Here we examine possibly the world's largest-ever intervention to lower these costs, the adoption of a fare-free public transit policy in Brazil during the 2022 national election, when about half of Brazilian voters were granted the right to use public transit for free on election days. However, while some cities adopted the benefit for both rounds of the election, others adopted it only for the second round. Using an event study design, we exploit this difference in adoption timing to examine the policy's causal impact on voter turnout rates and human mobility levels. We find that fare-free transit increased ridership between 7.2% and 17.5% on election days, however, we estimate a precise and robust null effect of the policy on voter turnout (Coef. −0.03p.p. with standard error of 0.22p.p.). Our results illustrate that monetary transport costs may not always be a critical factor behind non-participation. Although reducing transportation costs improves access to polling places, we show that even a full transit subsidy may not be sufficient to increase voter turnout.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-3794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6890</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102690</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Electoral behavior ; Fare-free public transport ; Urban transportation ; Voting behavior ; Voting costs</subject><ispartof>Electoral studies, 2023-12, Vol.86, p.102690, Article 102690</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-2e8695af1286ab6c5bff55983ab96b20a4345ad4c35ddfff5dcd76984192e8e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-2e8695af1286ab6c5bff55983ab96b20a4345ad4c35ddfff5dcd76984192e8e73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2125-7465</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Rafael H.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Renato S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bizzarro, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Rogério J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahis, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Daniel T.</creatorcontrib><title>Free public transit and voter turnout</title><title>Electoral studies</title><description>Transportation costs are an under-studied barrier to political participation. In many elections worldwide, subsidies to voter transportation are already provided or are under discussion. However, these types of incentives have not been rigorously evaluated. Here we examine possibly the world's largest-ever intervention to lower these costs, the adoption of a fare-free public transit policy in Brazil during the 2022 national election, when about half of Brazilian voters were granted the right to use public transit for free on election days. However, while some cities adopted the benefit for both rounds of the election, others adopted it only for the second round. Using an event study design, we exploit this difference in adoption timing to examine the policy's causal impact on voter turnout rates and human mobility levels. We find that fare-free transit increased ridership between 7.2% and 17.5% on election days, however, we estimate a precise and robust null effect of the policy on voter turnout (Coef. −0.03p.p. with standard error of 0.22p.p.). Our results illustrate that monetary transport costs may not always be a critical factor behind non-participation. Although reducing transportation costs improves access to polling places, we show that even a full transit subsidy may not be sufficient to increase voter turnout.</description><subject>Electoral behavior</subject><subject>Fare-free public transport</subject><subject>Urban transportation</subject><subject>Voting behavior</subject><subject>Voting costs</subject><issn>0261-3794</issn><issn>1873-6890</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFj01LxDAQhoMoWFd_g714bM1HkybHZXFdYcGLnkOaTCGltkuSLvjvzVLx6mngnXle5kHokeCaYCKehxpGsCmmxdUUU5ZTKhS-QgWRLauEVPgaFTkjFWtVc4vuYhwwJlQpUqCnfQAoT0s3elumYKboU2kmV57nBKFMS5jmJd2jm96MER5-5wZ97l8-dofq-P76ttseK8sITxUFKRQ3PaFSmE5Y3vU950oy0ynRUWwa1nDjGsu4c33eOetaoWRDVEahZRvUrr02zDEG6PUp-C8TvjXB-mKrB_1nqy-2erXN5HYlIb939hB0tB4mC86HfK_d7P_t-AF2X2Io</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Pereira, Rafael H.M.</creator><creator>Vieira, Renato S.</creator><creator>Bizzarro, Fernando</creator><creator>Barbosa, Rogério J.</creator><creator>Dahis, Ricardo</creator><creator>Ferreira, Daniel T.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2125-7465</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Free public transit and voter turnout</title><author>Pereira, Rafael H.M. ; Vieira, Renato S. ; Bizzarro, Fernando ; Barbosa, Rogério J. ; Dahis, Ricardo ; Ferreira, Daniel T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-2e8695af1286ab6c5bff55983ab96b20a4345ad4c35ddfff5dcd76984192e8e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Electoral behavior</topic><topic>Fare-free public transport</topic><topic>Urban transportation</topic><topic>Voting behavior</topic><topic>Voting costs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Rafael H.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Renato S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bizzarro, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Rogério J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahis, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Daniel T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Electoral studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pereira, Rafael H.M.</au><au>Vieira, Renato S.</au><au>Bizzarro, Fernando</au><au>Barbosa, Rogério J.</au><au>Dahis, Ricardo</au><au>Ferreira, Daniel T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Free public transit and voter turnout</atitle><jtitle>Electoral studies</jtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>86</volume><spage>102690</spage><pages>102690-</pages><artnum>102690</artnum><issn>0261-3794</issn><eissn>1873-6890</eissn><abstract>Transportation costs are an under-studied barrier to political participation. In many elections worldwide, subsidies to voter transportation are already provided or are under discussion. However, these types of incentives have not been rigorously evaluated. Here we examine possibly the world's largest-ever intervention to lower these costs, the adoption of a fare-free public transit policy in Brazil during the 2022 national election, when about half of Brazilian voters were granted the right to use public transit for free on election days. However, while some cities adopted the benefit for both rounds of the election, others adopted it only for the second round. Using an event study design, we exploit this difference in adoption timing to examine the policy's causal impact on voter turnout rates and human mobility levels. We find that fare-free transit increased ridership between 7.2% and 17.5% on election days, however, we estimate a precise and robust null effect of the policy on voter turnout (Coef. −0.03p.p. with standard error of 0.22p.p.). Our results illustrate that monetary transport costs may not always be a critical factor behind non-participation. Although reducing transportation costs improves access to polling places, we show that even a full transit subsidy may not be sufficient to increase voter turnout.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102690</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2125-7465</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-3794
ispartof Electoral studies, 2023-12, Vol.86, p.102690, Article 102690
issn 0261-3794
1873-6890
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_electstud_2023_102690
source Elsevier
subjects Electoral behavior
Fare-free public transport
Urban transportation
Voting behavior
Voting costs
title Free public transit and voter turnout
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A10%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Free%20public%20transit%20and%20voter%20turnout&rft.jtitle=Electoral%20studies&rft.au=Pereira,%20Rafael%20H.M.&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=86&rft.spage=102690&rft.pages=102690-&rft.artnum=102690&rft.issn=0261-3794&rft.eissn=1873-6890&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102690&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0261379423001129%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-2e8695af1286ab6c5bff55983ab96b20a4345ad4c35ddfff5dcd76984192e8e73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true