Loading…
A case study on the individual energy use of personal computers in an office setting and assessment of various feedback types toward energy savings
•Study on individuals’ desktop energy use and feedback in offices for 23 weeks.•Occupants’ behavior affected significantly the consumption of their machines.•Emails better communication channels than posters and leaflets.•Combined feedback more effective, especially personal advice and education.•Go...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energy and buildings 2015-10, Vol.104, p.73-86 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Study on individuals’ desktop energy use and feedback in offices for 23 weeks.•Occupants’ behavior affected significantly the consumption of their machines.•Emails better communication channels than posters and leaflets.•Combined feedback more effective, especially personal advice and education.•Good behavior continued 13 weeks after feedback was removed.
There is evidence that occupants’ energy use holds a large fraction of the total energy consumed at the office. Our work, motivated by a relevant study investigating the effect of individual feedback on energy use at the workdesk, exploits earlier findings to design a six-month field trial that monitors occupants’ energy use and provides individual feedback to 18 office employees in a university setting. This paper presents the research design and methods used, employing data analysis to assess how office workers responded to the feedback provided, and to examine their impact on the energy consumption of their desktop computers. The main findings were: the behavior of occupants affected the energy consumption of their computers in a large extent; emails were considered better communication channels than posters and leaflets; a combination of feedback messages was more useful, with personal advice, self monitoring and education being the most powerful; finally and most importantly energy reduction and proper use of equipment continued for 13 weeks after the feedback was removed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0378-7788 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.010 |