Loading…

Are all the U.S. biomass energy sources green?

Whether biomass energy should be regarded as a clean energy or not is still a contentious issue in the literature. Biomass energy comes from different sources, each having the possibility to affect the environment differently. Accounting for this heterogeneity to avoid any aggregation bias, this stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy policy 2023-08, Vol.179, p.113614, Article 113614
Main Authors: Adekoya, Oluwasegun B., Akinbayo, Sukurat B., Ishola, Oluwabunmi A., Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-17f2009ab4f76432cd663175c0d794221ac346858b278970558791de00223a673
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-17f2009ab4f76432cd663175c0d794221ac346858b278970558791de00223a673
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 113614
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 179
creator Adekoya, Oluwasegun B.
Akinbayo, Sukurat B.
Ishola, Oluwabunmi A.
Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh
description Whether biomass energy should be regarded as a clean energy or not is still a contentious issue in the literature. Biomass energy comes from different sources, each having the possibility to affect the environment differently. Accounting for this heterogeneity to avoid any aggregation bias, this study examines the impact of biomass energy on environmental quality in the U.S. from the standpoints of consumption and production, different biomass sources, asymmetric changes, and threshold effects. We find that the adverse environmental impact of biomass energy production is higher than its consumption. Moreover, except in the long-run where the impact of negative changes in biomass energy consumption overshadows its positive changes, positive changes in biomass energy consumption and production degrade the environment more than negative changes in biomass energy consumption. The threshold analysis further reveals that the production and consumption of biomass energy beyond some levels reduces environmental quality, unlike when they are minimal. Finally, wood is the most environmentally unfriendly biomass energy source, whereas biodiesel is the most environmentally friendly. The policy implications of these findings are crucial for environmental sustainability, climate change mitigation, and efficient production and use of biomass. •Accounting for disaggregation, asymmetries, and threshold effects in biomass energy-environment nexus.•Biomass energy production has higher adverse environmental impact than its consumption.•Positive changes in biomass energy largely worsen the environment more than its negative changes.•The positive environmental impact of biomass energy is ascertained after reaching some threshold levels.•Biodiesel and wood are the most environmentally friendly and unfriendly biomass energy sources, respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113614
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enpol_2023_113614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421523001994</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0301421523001994</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-17f2009ab4f76432cd663175c0d794221ac346858b278970558791de00223a673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9z01OwzAQhmELgUQpnICNLxAzYzt2skCoqviTKrGAri3HmZREaVLZAam3p6WsWc3qHX0PY7cIAgHNXSdo2I29kCCVQFQG9RmbYWFVZqy152wGCjDTEvNLdpVSBwC6KPWMiUUk7vueT5_E1-Jd8Kodtz4lTgPFzZ6n8SsGSnwTiYaHa3bR-D7Rzd-ds_XT48fyJVu9Pb8uF6ssKGWmDG0jAUpf6cYarWSojVFo8wC1LbWU6IPSpsiLStqitJDnhS2xJgAplTdWzZk6_Q1xTClS43ax3fq4dwjuSHad-yW7I9mdyIfq_lTRYdp3S9Gl0NIQqG4jhcnVY_tv_wNzoVzJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are all the U.S. biomass energy sources green?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Adekoya, Oluwasegun B. ; Akinbayo, Sukurat B. ; Ishola, Oluwabunmi A. ; Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh</creator><creatorcontrib>Adekoya, Oluwasegun B. ; Akinbayo, Sukurat B. ; Ishola, Oluwabunmi A. ; Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh</creatorcontrib><description>Whether biomass energy should be regarded as a clean energy or not is still a contentious issue in the literature. Biomass energy comes from different sources, each having the possibility to affect the environment differently. Accounting for this heterogeneity to avoid any aggregation bias, this study examines the impact of biomass energy on environmental quality in the U.S. from the standpoints of consumption and production, different biomass sources, asymmetric changes, and threshold effects. We find that the adverse environmental impact of biomass energy production is higher than its consumption. Moreover, except in the long-run where the impact of negative changes in biomass energy consumption overshadows its positive changes, positive changes in biomass energy consumption and production degrade the environment more than negative changes in biomass energy consumption. The threshold analysis further reveals that the production and consumption of biomass energy beyond some levels reduces environmental quality, unlike when they are minimal. Finally, wood is the most environmentally unfriendly biomass energy source, whereas biodiesel is the most environmentally friendly. The policy implications of these findings are crucial for environmental sustainability, climate change mitigation, and efficient production and use of biomass. •Accounting for disaggregation, asymmetries, and threshold effects in biomass energy-environment nexus.•Biomass energy production has higher adverse environmental impact than its consumption.•Positive changes in biomass energy largely worsen the environment more than its negative changes.•The positive environmental impact of biomass energy is ascertained after reaching some threshold levels.•Biodiesel and wood are the most environmentally friendly and unfriendly biomass energy sources, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113614</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Asymmetries ; Biomass energy ; Carbon emissions ; Threshold effects ; U.S</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2023-08, Vol.179, p.113614, Article 113614</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-17f2009ab4f76432cd663175c0d794221ac346858b278970558791de00223a673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-17f2009ab4f76432cd663175c0d794221ac346858b278970558791de00223a673</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9477-4055 ; 0000-0003-1665-807X ; 0000-0001-7238-6932</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adekoya, Oluwasegun B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akinbayo, Sukurat B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishola, Oluwabunmi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh</creatorcontrib><title>Are all the U.S. biomass energy sources green?</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Whether biomass energy should be regarded as a clean energy or not is still a contentious issue in the literature. Biomass energy comes from different sources, each having the possibility to affect the environment differently. Accounting for this heterogeneity to avoid any aggregation bias, this study examines the impact of biomass energy on environmental quality in the U.S. from the standpoints of consumption and production, different biomass sources, asymmetric changes, and threshold effects. We find that the adverse environmental impact of biomass energy production is higher than its consumption. Moreover, except in the long-run where the impact of negative changes in biomass energy consumption overshadows its positive changes, positive changes in biomass energy consumption and production degrade the environment more than negative changes in biomass energy consumption. The threshold analysis further reveals that the production and consumption of biomass energy beyond some levels reduces environmental quality, unlike when they are minimal. Finally, wood is the most environmentally unfriendly biomass energy source, whereas biodiesel is the most environmentally friendly. The policy implications of these findings are crucial for environmental sustainability, climate change mitigation, and efficient production and use of biomass. •Accounting for disaggregation, asymmetries, and threshold effects in biomass energy-environment nexus.•Biomass energy production has higher adverse environmental impact than its consumption.•Positive changes in biomass energy largely worsen the environment more than its negative changes.•The positive environmental impact of biomass energy is ascertained after reaching some threshold levels.•Biodiesel and wood are the most environmentally friendly and unfriendly biomass energy sources, respectively.</description><subject>Asymmetries</subject><subject>Biomass energy</subject><subject>Carbon emissions</subject><subject>Threshold effects</subject><subject>U.S</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9z01OwzAQhmELgUQpnICNLxAzYzt2skCoqviTKrGAri3HmZREaVLZAam3p6WsWc3qHX0PY7cIAgHNXSdo2I29kCCVQFQG9RmbYWFVZqy152wGCjDTEvNLdpVSBwC6KPWMiUUk7vueT5_E1-Jd8Kodtz4lTgPFzZ6n8SsGSnwTiYaHa3bR-D7Rzd-ds_XT48fyJVu9Pb8uF6ssKGWmDG0jAUpf6cYarWSojVFo8wC1LbWU6IPSpsiLStqitJDnhS2xJgAplTdWzZk6_Q1xTClS43ax3fq4dwjuSHad-yW7I9mdyIfq_lTRYdp3S9Gl0NIQqG4jhcnVY_tv_wNzoVzJ</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Adekoya, Oluwasegun B.</creator><creator>Akinbayo, Sukurat B.</creator><creator>Ishola, Oluwabunmi A.</creator><creator>Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9477-4055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1665-807X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7238-6932</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Are all the U.S. biomass energy sources green?</title><author>Adekoya, Oluwasegun B. ; Akinbayo, Sukurat B. ; Ishola, Oluwabunmi A. ; Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-17f2009ab4f76432cd663175c0d794221ac346858b278970558791de00223a673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Asymmetries</topic><topic>Biomass energy</topic><topic>Carbon emissions</topic><topic>Threshold effects</topic><topic>U.S</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adekoya, Oluwasegun B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akinbayo, Sukurat B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishola, Oluwabunmi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adekoya, Oluwasegun B.</au><au>Akinbayo, Sukurat B.</au><au>Ishola, Oluwabunmi A.</au><au>Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are all the U.S. biomass energy sources green?</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>179</volume><spage>113614</spage><pages>113614-</pages><artnum>113614</artnum><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><abstract>Whether biomass energy should be regarded as a clean energy or not is still a contentious issue in the literature. Biomass energy comes from different sources, each having the possibility to affect the environment differently. Accounting for this heterogeneity to avoid any aggregation bias, this study examines the impact of biomass energy on environmental quality in the U.S. from the standpoints of consumption and production, different biomass sources, asymmetric changes, and threshold effects. We find that the adverse environmental impact of biomass energy production is higher than its consumption. Moreover, except in the long-run where the impact of negative changes in biomass energy consumption overshadows its positive changes, positive changes in biomass energy consumption and production degrade the environment more than negative changes in biomass energy consumption. The threshold analysis further reveals that the production and consumption of biomass energy beyond some levels reduces environmental quality, unlike when they are minimal. Finally, wood is the most environmentally unfriendly biomass energy source, whereas biodiesel is the most environmentally friendly. The policy implications of these findings are crucial for environmental sustainability, climate change mitigation, and efficient production and use of biomass. •Accounting for disaggregation, asymmetries, and threshold effects in biomass energy-environment nexus.•Biomass energy production has higher adverse environmental impact than its consumption.•Positive changes in biomass energy largely worsen the environment more than its negative changes.•The positive environmental impact of biomass energy is ascertained after reaching some threshold levels.•Biodiesel and wood are the most environmentally friendly and unfriendly biomass energy sources, respectively.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113614</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9477-4055</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1665-807X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7238-6932</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2023-08, Vol.179, p.113614, Article 113614
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enpol_2023_113614
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Asymmetries
Biomass energy
Carbon emissions
Threshold effects
U.S
title Are all the U.S. biomass energy sources green?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A08%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20all%20the%20U.S.%20biomass%20energy%20sources%20green?&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Adekoya,%20Oluwasegun%20B.&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=179&rft.spage=113614&rft.pages=113614-&rft.artnum=113614&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113614&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0301421523001994%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c336t-17f2009ab4f76432cd663175c0d794221ac346858b278970558791de00223a673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true