Aquatic microcosm assessment of the effects of tylosin on Lemna gibba and Myriophyllum spicatum

• Published in: Environmental pollution (1987) 2005-02, Vol.133 (3), p.389-401
• Main Authors: Brain, Richard A., Bestari, Ketut (Jim), Sanderson, Hans, Hanson, Mark L., Wilson, Christian J., Johnson, David J., Sibley, Paul K., Solomon, Keith R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Anti-Infective Agents - toxicity; Antibiotics; Applied ecology; Araceae - drug effects; Biodegradation, Environmental; Biological and medical sciences; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid - methods; Ecosystem; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution; Environmental Monitoring - methods; Fresh Water - chemistry; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; General aspects; Half-Life; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Lemna gibba; Magnoliopsida - drug effects; Myriophyllum spicatum; Risk; Temperature; Tylosin; Tylosin - toxicity; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity
• ISSN: 0269-7491; 1873-6424
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.07.005

Tylosin is a macrolide antibiotic commonly used for therapeutic treatment and prophylaxis in livestock. As part of a larger ecotoxicological study, the potential phytotoxic effects of tylosin on the rooted macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum and the floating macrophyte Lemna gibba were assessed under semi-field conditions using 15 12 000-L microcosms. Concentrations of 0, 10, 30, 300 μg/L ( n = 3), and 600, 1000, and 3000 μg/L ( n = 1) were evaluated as part of separate ANOVA and regression analyses over an exposure period of 35 days. Fate of tylosin was monitored over time in the highest three treatments, where dissipation followed pseudo-first order kinetics with associated half-lives ranging from 9 to 10 days. For both M. spicatum and L. gibba, tylosin was found to cause no biologically significant changes to any endpoint assessed compared to controls at a Type I error rate of 0.1. However, subsequent power analyses revealed that there was generally insufficient power to declare that there were no significant differences at a Type II error rate of 0.2. Conclusions concerning biologically significant impacts were therefore further assessed based on other statistical criteria including comparisons of percent differences between replicated treatments and controls, minimum significant and minimum detectable differences, and coefficients of variation. Based on these criteria, at an ecological effect size of >20% change, tylosin was concluded to elicit no biologically or ecologically significant toxicity to M. spicatum or L. gibba. A hazard quotient assessment indicated that tylosin poses little risk to either species of macrophyte, with an HQ value calculated to be nearly three orders of magnitude below 1 (0.002). Tylosin is not expected to have ecologically significant effects on Ontario freshwater macrophytes.