New cosmogenic nuclide burial-dating model indicates onset of major glaciations in the Alps during Middle Pleistocene Transition

• Published in: Earth and planetary science letters 2020-11, Vol.549, p.116491, Article 116491
• Main Authors: Knudsen, Mads Faurschou, Nørgaard, Jesper, Grischott, Reto, Kober, Florian, Egholm, David Lundbek, Hansen, Thomas Mejer, Jansen, John D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: burial dating; cosmogenic nuclides; first major Alpine glaciations; inverse Monte Carlo modelling; Pleistocene climate
• ISSN: 0012-821X; 1385-013X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116491

•New cosmogenic nuclide burial-dating model to constrain the age of glacial sediments.•Higher Deckenschotter gravels in the northern Alpine Foreland deposited 1.0-0.9 Ma.•Onset of major glaciations in the Alps occurred during Middle Pleistocene Transition. A set of four outwash terraces in the northern Alpine Foreland motivated Penck and Brückner's classical scheme of four great Alpine ice ages: Günz, Mindel, Riss, and Würm. While it is now established that the Würm corresponds to marine isotope stages (MIS) 5d–2 (∼117–14 ka) and the Riss type locality to MIS 6 (∼191–130 ka), there is no consensus regarding the age of the older glaciations. The two oldest terraces, known as Höhere Deckenschotter (HDS) and Tiefere Deckenschotter (TDS) in Switzerland and neighbouring Germany, contain interbedded tills that directly indicate the first arrival of glaciers into the northern Alpine Foreland. Here, we set out to constrain the timing of the HDS, which signal the first major glaciations in the Alps. To achieve this goal, we devised a new burial-dating model tailored to glaciogenic sediments: P-PINI (Particle Pathway Inversion of Nuclide Inventories). The method applies a source-to-sink framework to a cosmogenic 10Be-26Al inversion model accounting for variable cosmic-ray exposure and non-steady erosion. Taking published 10Be-26Al data from five HDS sites (Feusi, Tromsberg, Siglistorf, Irchel Steig, and Irchel Hütz) and one TDS site (Iberig), we obtain age distributions (±1σ) that are especially well constrained for Feusi (0.93 ± 0.13 Ma), Iberig (0.93 ± 0.17 Ma), and Tromsberg (0.88 ± 0.14 Ma), less well-constrained for Irchel Steig (0.69 ± 0.25 Ma) and Siglistorf (0.94 ± 0.27 Ma), and very poorly constrained for Irchel Hütz (1.39 ± 0.56 Ma). Consistent with the morphostratigraphy, which dictates that the TDS postdates the HDS, we implemented a Bayesian modelling framework, yielding an age of 0.69 ± 0.12 Ma for Iberig (TDS) and a combined age of 0.95 ± 0.07 Ma for the HDS sites. Based on the P-PINI burial ages as well as the combined, Bayesian burial age, we propose an age around 1.0–0.9 Ma for the onset of the large Alpine glaciations that triggered the accumulation of the HDS outwash sediments. This roughly accords with the first long glaciation of the Pleistocene (MIS 24–22), identified as a step-change to colder climate and larger glaciations towards the end of the Middle Pleistocene Transition. While our results challenge previously reported ages of ∼2 Ma or m