Loading…
Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a concentrating solar power (CSP) plant in tower configuration with different storage capacity in molten salts
Although studies on the levelized cost of energy (LCoE) of concentrating solar power (CSP) plants were published in recent years, these studies were not related to the environmental impact generated. To fill this literature gap, this study compares the environmental impacts generated by four tower s...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of energy storage 2022-09, Vol.53, p.105219, Article 105219 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-41ebf51ccc1f59d5ac166daac2f8ddf211540a820c5d81a4e8a58ab121b461863 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-41ebf51ccc1f59d5ac166daac2f8ddf211540a820c5d81a4e8a58ab121b461863 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 105219 |
container_title | Journal of energy storage |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Gasa, Gemma Prieto, Cristina Lopez-Roman, Anton Cabeza, Luisa F. |
description | Although studies on the levelized cost of energy (LCoE) of concentrating solar power (CSP) plants were published in recent years, these studies were not related to the environmental impact generated. To fill this literature gap, this study compares the environmental impacts generated by four tower solar thermal plants with different storage capacities, 3, 6, 9, and 17.5 equivalent hours in nominal conditions were considered, being the plant of 17.5 h, a plant in operation. Results show that the environmental impacts generated throughout its useful life decrease when storage capacity increases. But when the storage capacity goes from 9 h to 17.5 h, the impacts generated are practically the same. Of the four plants analyzed, the most environmentally efficient plant is the one with a storage capacity of 9 h.
•LCA of tower CSP plants with different storage capacity in molten salts•Different storage capacities, 3, 6, 9, and 17.5 equivalent hours are analyzed.•The environmental impacts are analyzed with ReCiPe and IPCC 2013 methods.•The most environmentally efficient plant is the one with a storage capacity of 9 h.•The solar field, the TES system, and the tower have greatest impact. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.est.2022.105219 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_est_2022_105219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2352152X2201218X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2352152X2201218X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-41ebf51ccc1f59d5ac166daac2f8ddf211540a820c5d81a4e8a58ab121b461863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEQgIMoWGofwFuO7WFrJrtZtngqi3-woKCCtzDNJjVluylJtPQhfGezVjx6mh_mmxk-Qi6BzYFBebWZ6xDnnHGeasFhcUJGPBc8A5FXp385fzsnkxA2jCVIACzKEflqrNFUHVSnKYagQ9jqPtJpUy9n1BmKVLlepZbHaPs1Da5DT3durz2d1s9PM7rrMAG2p_GnmcaNXX8M466nexvfaWuN0X5YG6LzuE73cIfKxsOAbV0XdU8DdjFckDODXdCT3zgmr7c3L_V91jzePdTLJlN5wWJWgF4ZAUopMGLRClRQli2i4qZqW8MBRMGw4kyJtgIsdIWiwhVwWBUlVGU-JnDcq7wLwWsjd95u0R8kMDkolRuZlMpBqTwqTcz1kdHpsU-rvQzK6uSmtV6rKFtn_6G_ASHxgOo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a concentrating solar power (CSP) plant in tower configuration with different storage capacity in molten salts</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gasa, Gemma ; Prieto, Cristina ; Lopez-Roman, Anton ; Cabeza, Luisa F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gasa, Gemma ; Prieto, Cristina ; Lopez-Roman, Anton ; Cabeza, Luisa F.</creatorcontrib><description>Although studies on the levelized cost of energy (LCoE) of concentrating solar power (CSP) plants were published in recent years, these studies were not related to the environmental impact generated. To fill this literature gap, this study compares the environmental impacts generated by four tower solar thermal plants with different storage capacities, 3, 6, 9, and 17.5 equivalent hours in nominal conditions were considered, being the plant of 17.5 h, a plant in operation. Results show that the environmental impacts generated throughout its useful life decrease when storage capacity increases. But when the storage capacity goes from 9 h to 17.5 h, the impacts generated are practically the same. Of the four plants analyzed, the most environmentally efficient plant is the one with a storage capacity of 9 h.
•LCA of tower CSP plants with different storage capacity in molten salts•Different storage capacities, 3, 6, 9, and 17.5 equivalent hours are analyzed.•The environmental impacts are analyzed with ReCiPe and IPCC 2013 methods.•The most environmentally efficient plant is the one with a storage capacity of 9 h.•The solar field, the TES system, and the tower have greatest impact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2352-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-1538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.105219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Concentrating solar power (CSP) plant ; Environmental impact ; Life cycle assessment (LCA) ; Storage capacity ; Thermal energy storage (TES) ; Tower plant</subject><ispartof>Journal of energy storage, 2022-09, Vol.53, p.105219, Article 105219</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-41ebf51ccc1f59d5ac166daac2f8ddf211540a820c5d81a4e8a58ab121b461863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-41ebf51ccc1f59d5ac166daac2f8ddf211540a820c5d81a4e8a58ab121b461863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gasa, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prieto, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Roman, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabeza, Luisa F.</creatorcontrib><title>Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a concentrating solar power (CSP) plant in tower configuration with different storage capacity in molten salts</title><title>Journal of energy storage</title><description>Although studies on the levelized cost of energy (LCoE) of concentrating solar power (CSP) plants were published in recent years, these studies were not related to the environmental impact generated. To fill this literature gap, this study compares the environmental impacts generated by four tower solar thermal plants with different storage capacities, 3, 6, 9, and 17.5 equivalent hours in nominal conditions were considered, being the plant of 17.5 h, a plant in operation. Results show that the environmental impacts generated throughout its useful life decrease when storage capacity increases. But when the storage capacity goes from 9 h to 17.5 h, the impacts generated are practically the same. Of the four plants analyzed, the most environmentally efficient plant is the one with a storage capacity of 9 h.
•LCA of tower CSP plants with different storage capacity in molten salts•Different storage capacities, 3, 6, 9, and 17.5 equivalent hours are analyzed.•The environmental impacts are analyzed with ReCiPe and IPCC 2013 methods.•The most environmentally efficient plant is the one with a storage capacity of 9 h.•The solar field, the TES system, and the tower have greatest impact.</description><subject>Concentrating solar power (CSP) plant</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment (LCA)</subject><subject>Storage capacity</subject><subject>Thermal energy storage (TES)</subject><subject>Tower plant</subject><issn>2352-152X</issn><issn>2352-1538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEQgIMoWGofwFuO7WFrJrtZtngqi3-woKCCtzDNJjVluylJtPQhfGezVjx6mh_mmxk-Qi6BzYFBebWZ6xDnnHGeasFhcUJGPBc8A5FXp385fzsnkxA2jCVIACzKEflqrNFUHVSnKYagQ9jqPtJpUy9n1BmKVLlepZbHaPs1Da5DT3durz2d1s9PM7rrMAG2p_GnmcaNXX8M466nexvfaWuN0X5YG6LzuE73cIfKxsOAbV0XdU8DdjFckDODXdCT3zgmr7c3L_V91jzePdTLJlN5wWJWgF4ZAUopMGLRClRQli2i4qZqW8MBRMGw4kyJtgIsdIWiwhVwWBUlVGU-JnDcq7wLwWsjd95u0R8kMDkolRuZlMpBqTwqTcz1kdHpsU-rvQzK6uSmtV6rKFtn_6G_ASHxgOo</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Gasa, Gemma</creator><creator>Prieto, Cristina</creator><creator>Lopez-Roman, Anton</creator><creator>Cabeza, Luisa F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a concentrating solar power (CSP) plant in tower configuration with different storage capacity in molten salts</title><author>Gasa, Gemma ; Prieto, Cristina ; Lopez-Roman, Anton ; Cabeza, Luisa F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-41ebf51ccc1f59d5ac166daac2f8ddf211540a820c5d81a4e8a58ab121b461863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Concentrating solar power (CSP) plant</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment (LCA)</topic><topic>Storage capacity</topic><topic>Thermal energy storage (TES)</topic><topic>Tower plant</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gasa, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prieto, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Roman, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabeza, Luisa F.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of energy storage</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gasa, Gemma</au><au>Prieto, Cristina</au><au>Lopez-Roman, Anton</au><au>Cabeza, Luisa F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a concentrating solar power (CSP) plant in tower configuration with different storage capacity in molten salts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of energy storage</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>53</volume><spage>105219</spage><pages>105219-</pages><artnum>105219</artnum><issn>2352-152X</issn><eissn>2352-1538</eissn><abstract>Although studies on the levelized cost of energy (LCoE) of concentrating solar power (CSP) plants were published in recent years, these studies were not related to the environmental impact generated. To fill this literature gap, this study compares the environmental impacts generated by four tower solar thermal plants with different storage capacities, 3, 6, 9, and 17.5 equivalent hours in nominal conditions were considered, being the plant of 17.5 h, a plant in operation. Results show that the environmental impacts generated throughout its useful life decrease when storage capacity increases. But when the storage capacity goes from 9 h to 17.5 h, the impacts generated are practically the same. Of the four plants analyzed, the most environmentally efficient plant is the one with a storage capacity of 9 h.
•LCA of tower CSP plants with different storage capacity in molten salts•Different storage capacities, 3, 6, 9, and 17.5 equivalent hours are analyzed.•The environmental impacts are analyzed with ReCiPe and IPCC 2013 methods.•The most environmentally efficient plant is the one with a storage capacity of 9 h.•The solar field, the TES system, and the tower have greatest impact.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.est.2022.105219</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2352-152X |
ispartof | Journal of energy storage, 2022-09, Vol.53, p.105219, Article 105219 |
issn | 2352-152X 2352-1538 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_est_2022_105219 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Concentrating solar power (CSP) plant Environmental impact Life cycle assessment (LCA) Storage capacity Thermal energy storage (TES) Tower plant |
title | Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a concentrating solar power (CSP) plant in tower configuration with different storage capacity in molten salts |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A17%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Life%20cycle%20assessment%20(LCA)%20of%20a%20concentrating%20solar%20power%20(CSP)%20plant%20in%20tower%20configuration%20with%20different%20storage%20capacity%20in%20molten%20salts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20energy%20storage&rft.au=Gasa,%20Gemma&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=53&rft.spage=105219&rft.pages=105219-&rft.artnum=105219&rft.issn=2352-152X&rft.eissn=2352-1538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.est.2022.105219&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES2352152X2201218X%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-41ebf51ccc1f59d5ac166daac2f8ddf211540a820c5d81a4e8a58ab121b461863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |