Loading…

Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a concentrating solar power (CSP) plant in tower configuration with different storage capacity in molten salts

Although studies on the levelized cost of energy (LCoE) of concentrating solar power (CSP) plants were published in recent years, these studies were not related to the environmental impact generated. To fill this literature gap, this study compares the environmental impacts generated by four tower s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of energy storage 2022-09, Vol.53, p.105219, Article 105219
Main Authors: Gasa, Gemma, Prieto, Cristina, Lopez-Roman, Anton, Cabeza, Luisa F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-41ebf51ccc1f59d5ac166daac2f8ddf211540a820c5d81a4e8a58ab121b461863
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-41ebf51ccc1f59d5ac166daac2f8ddf211540a820c5d81a4e8a58ab121b461863
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 105219
container_title Journal of energy storage
container_volume 53
creator Gasa, Gemma
Prieto, Cristina
Lopez-Roman, Anton
Cabeza, Luisa F.
description Although studies on the levelized cost of energy (LCoE) of concentrating solar power (CSP) plants were published in recent years, these studies were not related to the environmental impact generated. To fill this literature gap, this study compares the environmental impacts generated by four tower solar thermal plants with different storage capacities, 3, 6, 9, and 17.5 equivalent hours in nominal conditions were considered, being the plant of 17.5 h, a plant in operation. Results show that the environmental impacts generated throughout its useful life decrease when storage capacity increases. But when the storage capacity goes from 9 h to 17.5 h, the impacts generated are practically the same. Of the four plants analyzed, the most environmentally efficient plant is the one with a storage capacity of 9 h. •LCA of tower CSP plants with different storage capacity in molten salts•Different storage capacities, 3, 6, 9, and 17.5 equivalent hours are analyzed.•The environmental impacts are analyzed with ReCiPe and IPCC 2013 methods.•The most environmentally efficient plant is the one with a storage capacity of 9 h.•The solar field, the TES system, and the tower have greatest impact.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.est.2022.105219
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_est_2022_105219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2352152X2201218X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2352152X2201218X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-41ebf51ccc1f59d5ac166daac2f8ddf211540a820c5d81a4e8a58ab121b461863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEQgIMoWGofwFuO7WFrJrtZtngqi3-woKCCtzDNJjVluylJtPQhfGezVjx6mh_mmxk-Qi6BzYFBebWZ6xDnnHGeasFhcUJGPBc8A5FXp385fzsnkxA2jCVIACzKEflqrNFUHVSnKYagQ9jqPtJpUy9n1BmKVLlepZbHaPs1Da5DT3durz2d1s9PM7rrMAG2p_GnmcaNXX8M466nexvfaWuN0X5YG6LzuE73cIfKxsOAbV0XdU8DdjFckDODXdCT3zgmr7c3L_V91jzePdTLJlN5wWJWgF4ZAUopMGLRClRQli2i4qZqW8MBRMGw4kyJtgIsdIWiwhVwWBUlVGU-JnDcq7wLwWsjd95u0R8kMDkolRuZlMpBqTwqTcz1kdHpsU-rvQzK6uSmtV6rKFtn_6G_ASHxgOo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a concentrating solar power (CSP) plant in tower configuration with different storage capacity in molten salts</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gasa, Gemma ; Prieto, Cristina ; Lopez-Roman, Anton ; Cabeza, Luisa F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gasa, Gemma ; Prieto, Cristina ; Lopez-Roman, Anton ; Cabeza, Luisa F.</creatorcontrib><description>Although studies on the levelized cost of energy (LCoE) of concentrating solar power (CSP) plants were published in recent years, these studies were not related to the environmental impact generated. To fill this literature gap, this study compares the environmental impacts generated by four tower solar thermal plants with different storage capacities, 3, 6, 9, and 17.5 equivalent hours in nominal conditions were considered, being the plant of 17.5 h, a plant in operation. Results show that the environmental impacts generated throughout its useful life decrease when storage capacity increases. But when the storage capacity goes from 9 h to 17.5 h, the impacts generated are practically the same. Of the four plants analyzed, the most environmentally efficient plant is the one with a storage capacity of 9 h. •LCA of tower CSP plants with different storage capacity in molten salts•Different storage capacities, 3, 6, 9, and 17.5 equivalent hours are analyzed.•The environmental impacts are analyzed with ReCiPe and IPCC 2013 methods.•The most environmentally efficient plant is the one with a storage capacity of 9 h.•The solar field, the TES system, and the tower have greatest impact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2352-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-1538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.105219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Concentrating solar power (CSP) plant ; Environmental impact ; Life cycle assessment (LCA) ; Storage capacity ; Thermal energy storage (TES) ; Tower plant</subject><ispartof>Journal of energy storage, 2022-09, Vol.53, p.105219, Article 105219</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-41ebf51ccc1f59d5ac166daac2f8ddf211540a820c5d81a4e8a58ab121b461863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-41ebf51ccc1f59d5ac166daac2f8ddf211540a820c5d81a4e8a58ab121b461863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gasa, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prieto, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Roman, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabeza, Luisa F.</creatorcontrib><title>Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a concentrating solar power (CSP) plant in tower configuration with different storage capacity in molten salts</title><title>Journal of energy storage</title><description>Although studies on the levelized cost of energy (LCoE) of concentrating solar power (CSP) plants were published in recent years, these studies were not related to the environmental impact generated. To fill this literature gap, this study compares the environmental impacts generated by four tower solar thermal plants with different storage capacities, 3, 6, 9, and 17.5 equivalent hours in nominal conditions were considered, being the plant of 17.5 h, a plant in operation. Results show that the environmental impacts generated throughout its useful life decrease when storage capacity increases. But when the storage capacity goes from 9 h to 17.5 h, the impacts generated are practically the same. Of the four plants analyzed, the most environmentally efficient plant is the one with a storage capacity of 9 h. •LCA of tower CSP plants with different storage capacity in molten salts•Different storage capacities, 3, 6, 9, and 17.5 equivalent hours are analyzed.•The environmental impacts are analyzed with ReCiPe and IPCC 2013 methods.•The most environmentally efficient plant is the one with a storage capacity of 9 h.•The solar field, the TES system, and the tower have greatest impact.</description><subject>Concentrating solar power (CSP) plant</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment (LCA)</subject><subject>Storage capacity</subject><subject>Thermal energy storage (TES)</subject><subject>Tower plant</subject><issn>2352-152X</issn><issn>2352-1538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEQgIMoWGofwFuO7WFrJrtZtngqi3-woKCCtzDNJjVluylJtPQhfGezVjx6mh_mmxk-Qi6BzYFBebWZ6xDnnHGeasFhcUJGPBc8A5FXp385fzsnkxA2jCVIACzKEflqrNFUHVSnKYagQ9jqPtJpUy9n1BmKVLlepZbHaPs1Da5DT3durz2d1s9PM7rrMAG2p_GnmcaNXX8M466nexvfaWuN0X5YG6LzuE73cIfKxsOAbV0XdU8DdjFckDODXdCT3zgmr7c3L_V91jzePdTLJlN5wWJWgF4ZAUopMGLRClRQli2i4qZqW8MBRMGw4kyJtgIsdIWiwhVwWBUlVGU-JnDcq7wLwWsjd95u0R8kMDkolRuZlMpBqTwqTcz1kdHpsU-rvQzK6uSmtV6rKFtn_6G_ASHxgOo</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Gasa, Gemma</creator><creator>Prieto, Cristina</creator><creator>Lopez-Roman, Anton</creator><creator>Cabeza, Luisa F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a concentrating solar power (CSP) plant in tower configuration with different storage capacity in molten salts</title><author>Gasa, Gemma ; Prieto, Cristina ; Lopez-Roman, Anton ; Cabeza, Luisa F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-41ebf51ccc1f59d5ac166daac2f8ddf211540a820c5d81a4e8a58ab121b461863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Concentrating solar power (CSP) plant</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment (LCA)</topic><topic>Storage capacity</topic><topic>Thermal energy storage (TES)</topic><topic>Tower plant</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gasa, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prieto, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Roman, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabeza, Luisa F.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of energy storage</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gasa, Gemma</au><au>Prieto, Cristina</au><au>Lopez-Roman, Anton</au><au>Cabeza, Luisa F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a concentrating solar power (CSP) plant in tower configuration with different storage capacity in molten salts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of energy storage</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>53</volume><spage>105219</spage><pages>105219-</pages><artnum>105219</artnum><issn>2352-152X</issn><eissn>2352-1538</eissn><abstract>Although studies on the levelized cost of energy (LCoE) of concentrating solar power (CSP) plants were published in recent years, these studies were not related to the environmental impact generated. To fill this literature gap, this study compares the environmental impacts generated by four tower solar thermal plants with different storage capacities, 3, 6, 9, and 17.5 equivalent hours in nominal conditions were considered, being the plant of 17.5 h, a plant in operation. Results show that the environmental impacts generated throughout its useful life decrease when storage capacity increases. But when the storage capacity goes from 9 h to 17.5 h, the impacts generated are practically the same. Of the four plants analyzed, the most environmentally efficient plant is the one with a storage capacity of 9 h. •LCA of tower CSP plants with different storage capacity in molten salts•Different storage capacities, 3, 6, 9, and 17.5 equivalent hours are analyzed.•The environmental impacts are analyzed with ReCiPe and IPCC 2013 methods.•The most environmentally efficient plant is the one with a storage capacity of 9 h.•The solar field, the TES system, and the tower have greatest impact.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.est.2022.105219</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2352-152X
ispartof Journal of energy storage, 2022-09, Vol.53, p.105219, Article 105219
issn 2352-152X
2352-1538
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_est_2022_105219
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Concentrating solar power (CSP) plant
Environmental impact
Life cycle assessment (LCA)
Storage capacity
Thermal energy storage (TES)
Tower plant
title Life cycle assessment (LCA) of a concentrating solar power (CSP) plant in tower configuration with different storage capacity in molten salts
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A17%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Life%20cycle%20assessment%20(LCA)%20of%20a%20concentrating%20solar%20power%20(CSP)%20plant%20in%20tower%20configuration%20with%20different%20storage%20capacity%20in%20molten%20salts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20energy%20storage&rft.au=Gasa,%20Gemma&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=53&rft.spage=105219&rft.pages=105219-&rft.artnum=105219&rft.issn=2352-152X&rft.eissn=2352-1538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.est.2022.105219&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES2352152X2201218X%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-41ebf51ccc1f59d5ac166daac2f8ddf211540a820c5d81a4e8a58ab121b461863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true