Loading…

Experimental study of three commercially available 18650 lithium ion batteries using multiple abuse methods

This study provides a comparative analysis of three commercially available and electrically similar lithium-ion batteries with a nominal capacity of 3 Ah, through a series of thermal, electrical, and mechanical abuse. Swab samples suggested that one cell type had an NMC [Li(NixMnyCo1-x-y)O2]cathode,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of energy storage 2023-08, Vol.65, p.107293, Article 107293
Main Authors: Abbott, Katie C., Buston, Jonathan E.H., Gill, Jason, Goddard, Steven L., Howard, Daniel, Howard, Gemma E., Read, Elliott, Williams, Rhiannon C.E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-1ce8d2c86b10c20eeb8c0fca8af489718002ad9b9f689ba05e4d79c65621dcd83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-1ce8d2c86b10c20eeb8c0fca8af489718002ad9b9f689ba05e4d79c65621dcd83
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 107293
container_title Journal of energy storage
container_volume 65
creator Abbott, Katie C.
Buston, Jonathan E.H.
Gill, Jason
Goddard, Steven L.
Howard, Daniel
Howard, Gemma E.
Read, Elliott
Williams, Rhiannon C.E.
description This study provides a comparative analysis of three commercially available and electrically similar lithium-ion batteries with a nominal capacity of 3 Ah, through a series of thermal, electrical, and mechanical abuse. Swab samples suggested that one cell type had an NMC [Li(NixMnyCo1-x-y)O2]cathode, and the remaining two had an NCA [Li(NixCoyAl1-x-y)O2]cathode. The precise nature of the chemical compositions and their ratios are not known. Repeated ARC tests showed that the three cells had comparable self-heating temperatures (~83 °C). Downward pressures of up to 41.5 kPa were recorded but were varied across all cells, and the furthest distance it travelled was over 40 m. Pressure vessel tests indicated that at least 20 L of air is required to ensure complete combustion, and higher molar concentrations in a nitrogen environment were witnessed for the NCA cells compared to the NMC cell, ~0.067 and ~0.052 mol Ah−1, respectively. Overcharge tests at higher charging rates approached temperatures required for thermal runaway, and a variety of safety mechanisms were observed. Comparable LIBs on paper do not always fail in the same way and therefore the results from one test cannot be reliably extrapolated to different cells despite their similarities. [Display omitted] •3 Different, but comparable, 3 Ah 18,650 cells evaluated•Multiple abuse methods employed•Different failure outcomes observed between the cells•Gas volume and composition measured
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.est.2023.107293
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_est_2023_107293</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2352152X23006904</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2352152X23006904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-1ce8d2c86b10c20eeb8c0fca8af489718002ad9b9f689ba05e4d79c65621dcd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGp_gLf8ga1Jtrub4ElK_YCCFwVvIR-zNjW7W5Jscf-9KRWPnmYG5nmZeRC6pWRJCa3v9kuIackIK_PcMFFeoBkrK1bQquSXfz37uEaLGPeEZKiiVNQz9LX5PkBwHfRJeRzTaCc8tDjtAgA2Q9dBME55P2F1VM4r7QFTXlcEe5d2buywG3qsVUo5BSIeo-s_cTf65A55VekxAu4g7QYbb9BVq3yExW-do_fHzdv6udi-Pr2sH7aFYaJJBTXALTO81pQYRgA0N6Q1iqt2xUVDOSFMWaFFW3OhFalgZRth6qpm1BrLyzmi51wThhgDtPKQP1RhkpTIkzC5l1mYPAmTZ2GZuT8zkA87OggyGge9AesCmCTt4P6hfwDZJnV6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental study of three commercially available 18650 lithium ion batteries using multiple abuse methods</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Abbott, Katie C. ; Buston, Jonathan E.H. ; Gill, Jason ; Goddard, Steven L. ; Howard, Daniel ; Howard, Gemma E. ; Read, Elliott ; Williams, Rhiannon C.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Katie C. ; Buston, Jonathan E.H. ; Gill, Jason ; Goddard, Steven L. ; Howard, Daniel ; Howard, Gemma E. ; Read, Elliott ; Williams, Rhiannon C.E.</creatorcontrib><description>This study provides a comparative analysis of three commercially available and electrically similar lithium-ion batteries with a nominal capacity of 3 Ah, through a series of thermal, electrical, and mechanical abuse. Swab samples suggested that one cell type had an NMC [Li(NixMnyCo1-x-y)O2]cathode, and the remaining two had an NCA [Li(NixCoyAl1-x-y)O2]cathode. The precise nature of the chemical compositions and their ratios are not known. Repeated ARC tests showed that the three cells had comparable self-heating temperatures (~83 °C). Downward pressures of up to 41.5 kPa were recorded but were varied across all cells, and the furthest distance it travelled was over 40 m. Pressure vessel tests indicated that at least 20 L of air is required to ensure complete combustion, and higher molar concentrations in a nitrogen environment were witnessed for the NCA cells compared to the NMC cell, ~0.067 and ~0.052 mol Ah−1, respectively. Overcharge tests at higher charging rates approached temperatures required for thermal runaway, and a variety of safety mechanisms were observed. Comparable LIBs on paper do not always fail in the same way and therefore the results from one test cannot be reliably extrapolated to different cells despite their similarities. [Display omitted] •3 Different, but comparable, 3 Ah 18,650 cells evaluated•Multiple abuse methods employed•Different failure outcomes observed between the cells•Gas volume and composition measured</description><identifier>ISSN: 2352-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-1538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2023.107293</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC) ; Commercial 18650 cells ; External short-circuit ; Gas analysis ; Lithium-ion ; Nail penetration ; Overcharge ; Short circuit</subject><ispartof>Journal of energy storage, 2023-08, Vol.65, p.107293, Article 107293</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-1ce8d2c86b10c20eeb8c0fca8af489718002ad9b9f689ba05e4d79c65621dcd83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-1ce8d2c86b10c20eeb8c0fca8af489718002ad9b9f689ba05e4d79c65621dcd83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Katie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buston, Jonathan E.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Gemma E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, Elliott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Rhiannon C.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental study of three commercially available 18650 lithium ion batteries using multiple abuse methods</title><title>Journal of energy storage</title><description>This study provides a comparative analysis of three commercially available and electrically similar lithium-ion batteries with a nominal capacity of 3 Ah, through a series of thermal, electrical, and mechanical abuse. Swab samples suggested that one cell type had an NMC [Li(NixMnyCo1-x-y)O2]cathode, and the remaining two had an NCA [Li(NixCoyAl1-x-y)O2]cathode. The precise nature of the chemical compositions and their ratios are not known. Repeated ARC tests showed that the three cells had comparable self-heating temperatures (~83 °C). Downward pressures of up to 41.5 kPa were recorded but were varied across all cells, and the furthest distance it travelled was over 40 m. Pressure vessel tests indicated that at least 20 L of air is required to ensure complete combustion, and higher molar concentrations in a nitrogen environment were witnessed for the NCA cells compared to the NMC cell, ~0.067 and ~0.052 mol Ah−1, respectively. Overcharge tests at higher charging rates approached temperatures required for thermal runaway, and a variety of safety mechanisms were observed. Comparable LIBs on paper do not always fail in the same way and therefore the results from one test cannot be reliably extrapolated to different cells despite their similarities. [Display omitted] •3 Different, but comparable, 3 Ah 18,650 cells evaluated•Multiple abuse methods employed•Different failure outcomes observed between the cells•Gas volume and composition measured</description><subject>Accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC)</subject><subject>Commercial 18650 cells</subject><subject>External short-circuit</subject><subject>Gas analysis</subject><subject>Lithium-ion</subject><subject>Nail penetration</subject><subject>Overcharge</subject><subject>Short circuit</subject><issn>2352-152X</issn><issn>2352-1538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGp_gLf8ga1Jtrub4ElK_YCCFwVvIR-zNjW7W5Jscf-9KRWPnmYG5nmZeRC6pWRJCa3v9kuIackIK_PcMFFeoBkrK1bQquSXfz37uEaLGPeEZKiiVNQz9LX5PkBwHfRJeRzTaCc8tDjtAgA2Q9dBME55P2F1VM4r7QFTXlcEe5d2buywG3qsVUo5BSIeo-s_cTf65A55VekxAu4g7QYbb9BVq3yExW-do_fHzdv6udi-Pr2sH7aFYaJJBTXALTO81pQYRgA0N6Q1iqt2xUVDOSFMWaFFW3OhFalgZRth6qpm1BrLyzmi51wThhgDtPKQP1RhkpTIkzC5l1mYPAmTZ2GZuT8zkA87OggyGge9AesCmCTt4P6hfwDZJnV6</recordid><startdate>20230815</startdate><enddate>20230815</enddate><creator>Abbott, Katie C.</creator><creator>Buston, Jonathan E.H.</creator><creator>Gill, Jason</creator><creator>Goddard, Steven L.</creator><creator>Howard, Daniel</creator><creator>Howard, Gemma E.</creator><creator>Read, Elliott</creator><creator>Williams, Rhiannon C.E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230815</creationdate><title>Experimental study of three commercially available 18650 lithium ion batteries using multiple abuse methods</title><author>Abbott, Katie C. ; Buston, Jonathan E.H. ; Gill, Jason ; Goddard, Steven L. ; Howard, Daniel ; Howard, Gemma E. ; Read, Elliott ; Williams, Rhiannon C.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-1ce8d2c86b10c20eeb8c0fca8af489718002ad9b9f689ba05e4d79c65621dcd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC)</topic><topic>Commercial 18650 cells</topic><topic>External short-circuit</topic><topic>Gas analysis</topic><topic>Lithium-ion</topic><topic>Nail penetration</topic><topic>Overcharge</topic><topic>Short circuit</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Katie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buston, Jonathan E.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goddard, Steven L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howard, Gemma E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, Elliott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Rhiannon C.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of energy storage</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abbott, Katie C.</au><au>Buston, Jonathan E.H.</au><au>Gill, Jason</au><au>Goddard, Steven L.</au><au>Howard, Daniel</au><au>Howard, Gemma E.</au><au>Read, Elliott</au><au>Williams, Rhiannon C.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental study of three commercially available 18650 lithium ion batteries using multiple abuse methods</atitle><jtitle>Journal of energy storage</jtitle><date>2023-08-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>65</volume><spage>107293</spage><pages>107293-</pages><artnum>107293</artnum><issn>2352-152X</issn><eissn>2352-1538</eissn><abstract>This study provides a comparative analysis of three commercially available and electrically similar lithium-ion batteries with a nominal capacity of 3 Ah, through a series of thermal, electrical, and mechanical abuse. Swab samples suggested that one cell type had an NMC [Li(NixMnyCo1-x-y)O2]cathode, and the remaining two had an NCA [Li(NixCoyAl1-x-y)O2]cathode. The precise nature of the chemical compositions and their ratios are not known. Repeated ARC tests showed that the three cells had comparable self-heating temperatures (~83 °C). Downward pressures of up to 41.5 kPa were recorded but were varied across all cells, and the furthest distance it travelled was over 40 m. Pressure vessel tests indicated that at least 20 L of air is required to ensure complete combustion, and higher molar concentrations in a nitrogen environment were witnessed for the NCA cells compared to the NMC cell, ~0.067 and ~0.052 mol Ah−1, respectively. Overcharge tests at higher charging rates approached temperatures required for thermal runaway, and a variety of safety mechanisms were observed. Comparable LIBs on paper do not always fail in the same way and therefore the results from one test cannot be reliably extrapolated to different cells despite their similarities. [Display omitted] •3 Different, but comparable, 3 Ah 18,650 cells evaluated•Multiple abuse methods employed•Different failure outcomes observed between the cells•Gas volume and composition measured</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.est.2023.107293</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2352-152X
ispartof Journal of energy storage, 2023-08, Vol.65, p.107293, Article 107293
issn 2352-152X
2352-1538
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_est_2023_107293
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Accelerating rate calorimetry (ARC)
Commercial 18650 cells
External short-circuit
Gas analysis
Lithium-ion
Nail penetration
Overcharge
Short circuit
title Experimental study of three commercially available 18650 lithium ion batteries using multiple abuse methods
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T03%3A09%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20study%20of%20three%20commercially%20available%2018650%20lithium%20ion%20batteries%20using%20multiple%20abuse%20methods&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20energy%20storage&rft.au=Abbott,%20Katie%20C.&rft.date=2023-08-15&rft.volume=65&rft.spage=107293&rft.pages=107293-&rft.artnum=107293&rft.issn=2352-152X&rft.eissn=2352-1538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.est.2023.107293&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES2352152X23006904%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c297t-1ce8d2c86b10c20eeb8c0fca8af489718002ad9b9f689ba05e4d79c65621dcd83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true