Fishery-specific solutions to seabird bycatch in the U.S. West Coast sablefish fishery

• Published in: Fisheries research 2017-12, Vol.196, p.85-95
• Main Authors: Gladics, Amanda J., Melvin, Edward F., Suryan, Robert M., Good, Thomas P., Jannot, Jason E., Guy, Troy J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bird scaring lines; Blackfooted albatross; Collaborative research; Floated demersal longlines; Night setting; Short-tailed albatross
• ISSN: 0165-7836; 1872-6763
• DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2017.08.015

•10x higher albatross attack rates on floated vs. non-floated longlines beyond BSL protection.•Albatross attack rates and gear sink profiles were similar for large and small vessels.•Night setting could be an effective albatross bycatch reduction option for U.S. West Coast sablefish fishery sectors.•Region-specific seabird avoidance strategies require collaborative research with fishermen. Bird scaring lines (BSLs) protect longline fishing gear from seabird attacks, save bait, reduce incidental seabird mortality and are the most commonly prescribed seabird bycatch mitigation measure worldwide. We collaborated with fishermen to assess the efficacy of applying BSL regulations from the demersal longline sablefish fishery in Alaska to a similar fishery along the U.S West Coast. In contrast to Alaska, some U.S. West Coast vessels use floats along the line to keep hooks off the seafloor, where scavengers degrade the bait and the target catch. Our results confirmed that BSL regulations from Alaska were sufficient to protect baits from bird attacks on longlines without floats, but not baits on longlines with floats. Longlines with floats sank below the reach of albatrosses (2m depth) at a distance astern (157.7m±44.8 95% CI) that was 2.3 times farther than longlines without floats (68.8m±37.8 95% CI). The floated longline distance was well beyond the protection afforded by BSLs, which is approximately 40m of aerial extent. Black-footed albatross attacked floated longlines at rates ten times more (2.7 attacks/1000 hooks, 0.48–4.45 95%CI) than longlines without floats (0.20 attacks/1000 hooks, 0.01–0.36 95% CI). Retrospective analysis of NOAA Fisheries Groundfish Observer Program data suggested that seabird bycatch occurs in a few sablefish longline fishing sectors and a minority of vessels, but is not confined to larger vessels. Analysis also confirmed fishermen testimonials that night setting reduced albatross bycatch by an order of magnitude compared to daytime setting, without reducing target catch. Night setting could be an effective albatross bycatch prevention practice if applied to the U.S. West Coast sablefish longline fishery and provide a practical alternative for vessels that elect to use floated longlines. These results highlight the importance of understanding region-specific longline gear modifications to identify effective bycatch reduction tools and the value of working collaboratively with fishermen to craft solutions.