Field trials of an acoustic decoy to attract sperm whales away from commercial longline fishing vessels in western Gulf of Alaska

• Published in: Fisheries research 2017-12, Vol.196, p.141-150
• Main Authors: Wild, Lauren, Thode, Aaron, Straley, Janice, Rhoads, Stephen, Falvey, Dan, Liddle, Joseph
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acoustic decoy; Depredation; Gulf of Alaska; Longline fishing; Sperm whales
• ISSN: 0165-7836; 1872-6763
• DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2017.08.017

•The acoustic decoy is designed to attract whales away from true fishing activity.•Increasing the distance between the fishing haul and the decoy did not significantly decrease the presence of whales at the fishing haul.•Increasing the distance between the fishing haul and decoy did result in significantly fewer whales at the fishing haul.•On four occasions whales were detected at the decoy but never at the true fishing haul, likely being detained at the decoy.•While caveats do exist, the acoustic decoy can be successful to minimize sperm whale interactions with fishing vessels. In the Gulf of Alaska, sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) are known to remove sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria) from commercial longline fishing gear. This removal, called depredation, is economically costly to fishermen, presents risk of injury or mortality to whales, and could lead to unknown removals during the federal sablefish longline survey that contributes to estimation of the annual fishing quota. In 2013 the Southeast Alaska Sperm Whale Avoidance Project (SEASWAP) evaluated the efficacy of an acoustic decoy in reducing encounters between sperm whales and longline fishing gear. The aim of the acoustic decoy was to use fishing vessel sounds to attract whales to an area away from the true fishing haul in order to reduce interactions between commercial fishing vessels and whales. A custom playback device that could be remotely activated via a radio modem was incorporated into an anchored buoy system that could be deployed by the vessel during a two-month trip between June and July 2013. Once activated, the decoy broadcasted vessel-hauling noises known to attract whales, while the vessel performed several true hauls at various ranges from the device. Passive acoustic recorders at both the decoy and true set locations were also deployed to evaluate whale presence. Twenty-six hauls were conducted while a decoy was deployed, yielding fourteen sets with whales present while the decoy was functional. A significant relationship was found between the number of whales present at the true fishing haul and the distance of the haul from the decoy (1–14km range), with the decoy being most effective at ranges greater than 9km (t=−2.06, df=12, p=0.04). The results suggest that acoustic decoys may be a cost-effective means for reducing longlining depredation from sperm and possibly killer whales under certain circumstances.