Loading…

Poor utility of environmental DNA for estimating the biomass of a threatened freshwater teleost; but clear direction for future candidate assessments

Environmental DNA (eDNA) can potentially facilitate estimating the abundance of teleosts and might therefore be used for stock assessments. Nevertheless, relationships are species-specific—reflecting several abiotic and biotic factors that require understanding prior to ongoing research investment....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fisheries research 2023-02, Vol.258, p.106545, Article 106545
Main Authors: Rourke, Meaghan L., Walburn, Jackson Wilkes, Broadhurst, Matt K., Fowler, Ashley M., Hughes, Julian M., Fielder, D. Stewart, DiBattista, Joseph D., Furlan, Elise M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-448c19f1d2aec6489e7cffcde2c965daa710bf0b9e15f5245bd36a4b3be6bc943
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-448c19f1d2aec6489e7cffcde2c965daa710bf0b9e15f5245bd36a4b3be6bc943
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 106545
container_title Fisheries research
container_volume 258
creator Rourke, Meaghan L.
Walburn, Jackson Wilkes
Broadhurst, Matt K.
Fowler, Ashley M.
Hughes, Julian M.
Fielder, D. Stewart
DiBattista, Joseph D.
Furlan, Elise M.
description Environmental DNA (eDNA) can potentially facilitate estimating the abundance of teleosts and might therefore be used for stock assessments. Nevertheless, relationships are species-specific—reflecting several abiotic and biotic factors that require understanding prior to ongoing research investment. Here, we investigated potential relationships between eDNA concentrations and the weights of an endemic and threatened Australian teleost, Murray cod, Maccullochella peelii to determine if eDNA could be used to estimate biomass. Three controlled aquaria experiments using juvenile fish were conducted to investigate the time to eDNA stabilisation in tanks following stocking (aquaria experiment 1), and then if water temperature (aquaria experiment 2) and/or fish weight (aquaria experiment 3) explained variability among eDNA concentrations in tanks. In aquaria experiment 1, eDNA concentrations stabilised nine days after stocking, but there were no significant effects of water temperature or fish weight in aquaria experiments 2 and 3. The latter result was verified during a mesocosm experiment using brood stock held in semi-natural outdoor ponds. During a fourth aquaria experiment (experiment 4), ten similar-sized juveniles were held under identical conditions in individual replicate tanks, with significant variability in eDNA concentrations that was not explained by individual fish weights. When all aquaria data were collectively assessed, there was a significant (but not useful) quadratic relationship between eDNA concentrations and fish weight. We conclude eDNA is not suitable for estimating the weight/biomass of Murray cod. Assessing the suitability of future candidate species might benefit from similar initial aquaria experiments under controlled conditions to test the independence of individual fish weight on variability among eDNA concentrations in tanks. •eDNA can facilitate biomass/abundance estimates for many teleosts—but not all.•High intra-specific variability precluded any utility for Maccullochella peelii.•Such variability should be assessed first among future candidate species.•Such an approach would maximise cost/benefit to researchers and end users.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106545
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fishres_2022_106545</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165783622003228</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0165783622003228</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-448c19f1d2aec6489e7cffcde2c965daa710bf0b9e15f5245bd36a4b3be6bc943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMInIPkHUmwncRJxQFV5Sgg4wNly7DV1lcbIdor6IfwvDumd02pXM7Mzg9AlJQtKKL_aLIwNaw9hwQhj6cbLojxCM1pXLOMVz4_RLOHKrKpzforOQtgQQqqK0xn6eXPO4yHazsY9dgZDv7Pe9Vvoo-zw7csSmwSAEO1WRtt_4rgG3Fq3lSGMeJkOHmSEHjQ2ycT6Oy0eR-jAhXiN2yFi1YH0WFsPKlrX_0maIQ4esJK9tjpRcBKEEMbH4RydGNkFuDjMOfq4v3tfPWbPrw9Pq-VzpljexKwoakUbQzWToHhRN1ApY5QGphpeaikrSlpD2gZoaUpWlK3OuSzavAXeqqbI56icdJV3IXgw4sunnH4vKBFjt2IjDt2KsVsxdZt4NxMPkrmdBS-CstArmCIK7ew_Cr9jFoqx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Poor utility of environmental DNA for estimating the biomass of a threatened freshwater teleost; but clear direction for future candidate assessments</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Rourke, Meaghan L. ; Walburn, Jackson Wilkes ; Broadhurst, Matt K. ; Fowler, Ashley M. ; Hughes, Julian M. ; Fielder, D. Stewart ; DiBattista, Joseph D. ; Furlan, Elise M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rourke, Meaghan L. ; Walburn, Jackson Wilkes ; Broadhurst, Matt K. ; Fowler, Ashley M. ; Hughes, Julian M. ; Fielder, D. Stewart ; DiBattista, Joseph D. ; Furlan, Elise M.</creatorcontrib><description>Environmental DNA (eDNA) can potentially facilitate estimating the abundance of teleosts and might therefore be used for stock assessments. Nevertheless, relationships are species-specific—reflecting several abiotic and biotic factors that require understanding prior to ongoing research investment. Here, we investigated potential relationships between eDNA concentrations and the weights of an endemic and threatened Australian teleost, Murray cod, Maccullochella peelii to determine if eDNA could be used to estimate biomass. Three controlled aquaria experiments using juvenile fish were conducted to investigate the time to eDNA stabilisation in tanks following stocking (aquaria experiment 1), and then if water temperature (aquaria experiment 2) and/or fish weight (aquaria experiment 3) explained variability among eDNA concentrations in tanks. In aquaria experiment 1, eDNA concentrations stabilised nine days after stocking, but there were no significant effects of water temperature or fish weight in aquaria experiments 2 and 3. The latter result was verified during a mesocosm experiment using brood stock held in semi-natural outdoor ponds. During a fourth aquaria experiment (experiment 4), ten similar-sized juveniles were held under identical conditions in individual replicate tanks, with significant variability in eDNA concentrations that was not explained by individual fish weights. When all aquaria data were collectively assessed, there was a significant (but not useful) quadratic relationship between eDNA concentrations and fish weight. We conclude eDNA is not suitable for estimating the weight/biomass of Murray cod. Assessing the suitability of future candidate species might benefit from similar initial aquaria experiments under controlled conditions to test the independence of individual fish weight on variability among eDNA concentrations in tanks. •eDNA can facilitate biomass/abundance estimates for many teleosts—but not all.•High intra-specific variability precluded any utility for Maccullochella peelii.•Such variability should be assessed first among future candidate species.•Such an approach would maximise cost/benefit to researchers and end users.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-7836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106545</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Biomass ; Environmental DNA ; Null result ; Stock assessment</subject><ispartof>Fisheries research, 2023-02, Vol.258, p.106545, Article 106545</ispartof><rights>2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-448c19f1d2aec6489e7cffcde2c965daa710bf0b9e15f5245bd36a4b3be6bc943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-448c19f1d2aec6489e7cffcde2c965daa710bf0b9e15f5245bd36a4b3be6bc943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rourke, Meaghan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walburn, Jackson Wilkes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broadhurst, Matt K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Ashley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Julian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fielder, D. Stewart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiBattista, Joseph D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furlan, Elise M.</creatorcontrib><title>Poor utility of environmental DNA for estimating the biomass of a threatened freshwater teleost; but clear direction for future candidate assessments</title><title>Fisheries research</title><description>Environmental DNA (eDNA) can potentially facilitate estimating the abundance of teleosts and might therefore be used for stock assessments. Nevertheless, relationships are species-specific—reflecting several abiotic and biotic factors that require understanding prior to ongoing research investment. Here, we investigated potential relationships between eDNA concentrations and the weights of an endemic and threatened Australian teleost, Murray cod, Maccullochella peelii to determine if eDNA could be used to estimate biomass. Three controlled aquaria experiments using juvenile fish were conducted to investigate the time to eDNA stabilisation in tanks following stocking (aquaria experiment 1), and then if water temperature (aquaria experiment 2) and/or fish weight (aquaria experiment 3) explained variability among eDNA concentrations in tanks. In aquaria experiment 1, eDNA concentrations stabilised nine days after stocking, but there were no significant effects of water temperature or fish weight in aquaria experiments 2 and 3. The latter result was verified during a mesocosm experiment using brood stock held in semi-natural outdoor ponds. During a fourth aquaria experiment (experiment 4), ten similar-sized juveniles were held under identical conditions in individual replicate tanks, with significant variability in eDNA concentrations that was not explained by individual fish weights. When all aquaria data were collectively assessed, there was a significant (but not useful) quadratic relationship between eDNA concentrations and fish weight. We conclude eDNA is not suitable for estimating the weight/biomass of Murray cod. Assessing the suitability of future candidate species might benefit from similar initial aquaria experiments under controlled conditions to test the independence of individual fish weight on variability among eDNA concentrations in tanks. •eDNA can facilitate biomass/abundance estimates for many teleosts—but not all.•High intra-specific variability precluded any utility for Maccullochella peelii.•Such variability should be assessed first among future candidate species.•Such an approach would maximise cost/benefit to researchers and end users.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Environmental DNA</subject><subject>Null result</subject><subject>Stock assessment</subject><issn>0165-7836</issn><issn>1872-6763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMInIPkHUmwncRJxQFV5Sgg4wNly7DV1lcbIdor6IfwvDumd02pXM7Mzg9AlJQtKKL_aLIwNaw9hwQhj6cbLojxCM1pXLOMVz4_RLOHKrKpzforOQtgQQqqK0xn6eXPO4yHazsY9dgZDv7Pe9Vvoo-zw7csSmwSAEO1WRtt_4rgG3Fq3lSGMeJkOHmSEHjQ2ycT6Oy0eR-jAhXiN2yFi1YH0WFsPKlrX_0maIQ4esJK9tjpRcBKEEMbH4RydGNkFuDjMOfq4v3tfPWbPrw9Pq-VzpljexKwoakUbQzWToHhRN1ApY5QGphpeaikrSlpD2gZoaUpWlK3OuSzavAXeqqbI56icdJV3IXgw4sunnH4vKBFjt2IjDt2KsVsxdZt4NxMPkrmdBS-CstArmCIK7ew_Cr9jFoqx</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Rourke, Meaghan L.</creator><creator>Walburn, Jackson Wilkes</creator><creator>Broadhurst, Matt K.</creator><creator>Fowler, Ashley M.</creator><creator>Hughes, Julian M.</creator><creator>Fielder, D. Stewart</creator><creator>DiBattista, Joseph D.</creator><creator>Furlan, Elise M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Poor utility of environmental DNA for estimating the biomass of a threatened freshwater teleost; but clear direction for future candidate assessments</title><author>Rourke, Meaghan L. ; Walburn, Jackson Wilkes ; Broadhurst, Matt K. ; Fowler, Ashley M. ; Hughes, Julian M. ; Fielder, D. Stewart ; DiBattista, Joseph D. ; Furlan, Elise M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-448c19f1d2aec6489e7cffcde2c965daa710bf0b9e15f5245bd36a4b3be6bc943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Environmental DNA</topic><topic>Null result</topic><topic>Stock assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rourke, Meaghan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walburn, Jackson Wilkes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broadhurst, Matt K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Ashley M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Julian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fielder, D. Stewart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiBattista, Joseph D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furlan, Elise M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Fisheries research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rourke, Meaghan L.</au><au>Walburn, Jackson Wilkes</au><au>Broadhurst, Matt K.</au><au>Fowler, Ashley M.</au><au>Hughes, Julian M.</au><au>Fielder, D. Stewart</au><au>DiBattista, Joseph D.</au><au>Furlan, Elise M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Poor utility of environmental DNA for estimating the biomass of a threatened freshwater teleost; but clear direction for future candidate assessments</atitle><jtitle>Fisheries research</jtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>258</volume><spage>106545</spage><pages>106545-</pages><artnum>106545</artnum><issn>0165-7836</issn><eissn>1872-6763</eissn><abstract>Environmental DNA (eDNA) can potentially facilitate estimating the abundance of teleosts and might therefore be used for stock assessments. Nevertheless, relationships are species-specific—reflecting several abiotic and biotic factors that require understanding prior to ongoing research investment. Here, we investigated potential relationships between eDNA concentrations and the weights of an endemic and threatened Australian teleost, Murray cod, Maccullochella peelii to determine if eDNA could be used to estimate biomass. Three controlled aquaria experiments using juvenile fish were conducted to investigate the time to eDNA stabilisation in tanks following stocking (aquaria experiment 1), and then if water temperature (aquaria experiment 2) and/or fish weight (aquaria experiment 3) explained variability among eDNA concentrations in tanks. In aquaria experiment 1, eDNA concentrations stabilised nine days after stocking, but there were no significant effects of water temperature or fish weight in aquaria experiments 2 and 3. The latter result was verified during a mesocosm experiment using brood stock held in semi-natural outdoor ponds. During a fourth aquaria experiment (experiment 4), ten similar-sized juveniles were held under identical conditions in individual replicate tanks, with significant variability in eDNA concentrations that was not explained by individual fish weights. When all aquaria data were collectively assessed, there was a significant (but not useful) quadratic relationship between eDNA concentrations and fish weight. We conclude eDNA is not suitable for estimating the weight/biomass of Murray cod. Assessing the suitability of future candidate species might benefit from similar initial aquaria experiments under controlled conditions to test the independence of individual fish weight on variability among eDNA concentrations in tanks. •eDNA can facilitate biomass/abundance estimates for many teleosts—but not all.•High intra-specific variability precluded any utility for Maccullochella peelii.•Such variability should be assessed first among future candidate species.•Such an approach would maximise cost/benefit to researchers and end users.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106545</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-7836
ispartof Fisheries research, 2023-02, Vol.258, p.106545, Article 106545
issn 0165-7836
1872-6763
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fishres_2022_106545
source Elsevier
subjects Abundance
Biomass
Environmental DNA
Null result
Stock assessment
title Poor utility of environmental DNA for estimating the biomass of a threatened freshwater teleost; but clear direction for future candidate assessments
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A37%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Poor%20utility%20of%20environmental%20DNA%20for%20estimating%20the%20biomass%20of%20a%20threatened%20freshwater%20teleost;%20but%20clear%20direction%20for%20future%20candidate%20assessments&rft.jtitle=Fisheries%20research&rft.au=Rourke,%20Meaghan%20L.&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=258&rft.spage=106545&rft.pages=106545-&rft.artnum=106545&rft.issn=0165-7836&rft.eissn=1872-6763&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106545&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0165783622003228%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c239t-448c19f1d2aec6489e7cffcde2c965daa710bf0b9e15f5245bd36a4b3be6bc943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true