Loading…
Comparison of floating and traditional artificial reef areas using an ecosystem-based approach in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China
Instead of the conventional fishery survey-based approach, this study used an ecosystem-based approach to evaluate the ecological impacts of artificial reefs (ARs). Trophic models were initially employed for floating artificial reef area (FARA), traditional artificial reef area (TARA), and reef-free...
Saved in:
Published in: | Fisheries research 2024-09, Vol.277, p.107085, Article 107085 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-53aaa616581120c04ed86bcc097d50ab3dcfd47784ca6dff5f6f9d63606f6fbd3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 107085 |
container_title | Fisheries research |
container_volume | 277 |
creator | Han, Chenglong Pang, Xiaoke Liu, Wanni Fu, Wenjing Guo, Biao Kinoshita, Toshihisa Zheng, Debin Yamashita, Osamu Feng, Jianfeng Lu, Xueqiang |
description | Instead of the conventional fishery survey-based approach, this study used an ecosystem-based approach to evaluate the ecological impacts of artificial reefs (ARs). Trophic models were initially employed for floating artificial reef area (FARA), traditional artificial reef area (TARA), and reef-free control area (CONA) in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China. Ecosystem-based analyses of FARA and TARA highlighted similar trophic functioning characteristics. A substantial proportion of energy occurred at trophic levels I and II, and most of the primary production was utilized through grazing pathways. As a structuring group, zoobenthos played a pivotal role in enabling pelagic-benthic coupling in both ecosystems. Additionally, the top-down control in the FARA and TARA ecosystems was enhanced. Conventional surveys and comparative ecosystem-based analyses revealed distinct differences between the two ecosystems. In FARA, a significant increase was observed in pelagic fish and zoobenthos, with increases of 3.60- and 4.44-fold, respectively, compared with CONA. Conversely, TARA showed a considerable increase in demersal fish, approximately 2.6 times greater than that of CONA. Based on the biomass disparity between the two ARs, the ecosystem-based approach revealed that the FARA ecosystem led to enhanced energy pathways from detritus, greater total system throughput, higher energy cycle proportion, and more efficient nutrient transfer. Furthermore, the FARA ecosystem showed relatively high stability and maturity (total primary production/total respiration, 1.616 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107085 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fishres_2024_107085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165783624001498</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0165783624001498</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-53aaa616581120c04ed86bcc097d50ab3dcfd47784ca6dff5f6f9d63606f6fbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMInIPkDSHFednpCNDylSlzgbG3sNXHVxpFtkPoJ_DWOwp3Tzq5mdneGkOucrXKW89vdytjQewyrghVVmgnW1CdkkTeiyLjg5SlZJF6diabk5-QihB1jTAieL8hP6w4jeBvcQJ2hZu8g2uGTwqBp9KBttG6APQUfrbHKJugRTeoRAv0KM5eicuEYIh6yDgJqCuPoHaie2oHGHukDhB6HCBM7KadTG9eDpRs43tC2twNckjMD-4BXf3VJPp4e39uXbPv2_NrebzOV_MSsLgGAJzdNnhdMsQp1wzul2FromkFXamV0JURTKeDamNpws9a85Iwn1OlySep5r_IuBI9Gjt4ewB9lzuSUp9zJvzzllKec80y6u1mH6blvi14GZXFQqK1HFaV29p8Nv4IjhD0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of floating and traditional artificial reef areas using an ecosystem-based approach in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Han, Chenglong ; Pang, Xiaoke ; Liu, Wanni ; Fu, Wenjing ; Guo, Biao ; Kinoshita, Toshihisa ; Zheng, Debin ; Yamashita, Osamu ; Feng, Jianfeng ; Lu, Xueqiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Han, Chenglong ; Pang, Xiaoke ; Liu, Wanni ; Fu, Wenjing ; Guo, Biao ; Kinoshita, Toshihisa ; Zheng, Debin ; Yamashita, Osamu ; Feng, Jianfeng ; Lu, Xueqiang</creatorcontrib><description>Instead of the conventional fishery survey-based approach, this study used an ecosystem-based approach to evaluate the ecological impacts of artificial reefs (ARs). Trophic models were initially employed for floating artificial reef area (FARA), traditional artificial reef area (TARA), and reef-free control area (CONA) in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China. Ecosystem-based analyses of FARA and TARA highlighted similar trophic functioning characteristics. A substantial proportion of energy occurred at trophic levels I and II, and most of the primary production was utilized through grazing pathways. As a structuring group, zoobenthos played a pivotal role in enabling pelagic-benthic coupling in both ecosystems. Additionally, the top-down control in the FARA and TARA ecosystems was enhanced. Conventional surveys and comparative ecosystem-based analyses revealed distinct differences between the two ecosystems. In FARA, a significant increase was observed in pelagic fish and zoobenthos, with increases of 3.60- and 4.44-fold, respectively, compared with CONA. Conversely, TARA showed a considerable increase in demersal fish, approximately 2.6 times greater than that of CONA. Based on the biomass disparity between the two ARs, the ecosystem-based approach revealed that the FARA ecosystem led to enhanced energy pathways from detritus, greater total system throughput, higher energy cycle proportion, and more efficient nutrient transfer. Furthermore, the FARA ecosystem showed relatively high stability and maturity (total primary production/total respiration, 1.616<1.946) compared to the TARA ecosystem, suggesting a greater potential to withstand disturbances. Consequently, marine ecosystems respond differently to AR management initiatives. This study emphasizes the reliability of ecosystem-based evaluations during the initial phases of AR construction. Despite being a preliminary pilot study, this study offers insights into the impact on AR ecosystems, especially the role of floating ARs in coastal management.
[Display omitted]
•The ecosystems-based mode evaluated the impacts of ARs on structure and functioning.•The pelagic fish introduced to floating ARs area had notably increased.•Floating ARs ecosystem display improved scale, energy cycling, and nutrient transfer.•The use of floating ARs improved ecosystem stability and maturation.•Floating ARs showed potential for restoring ecological in nearshore waters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-7836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Ecological network analysis ; Ecological restoration ; Ecopath model ; Ecosystem properties</subject><ispartof>Fisheries research, 2024-09, Vol.277, p.107085, Article 107085</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-53aaa616581120c04ed86bcc097d50ab3dcfd47784ca6dff5f6f9d63606f6fbd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Han, Chenglong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pang, Xiaoke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Wenjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Biao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinoshita, Toshihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Debin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamashita, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Jianfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xueqiang</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of floating and traditional artificial reef areas using an ecosystem-based approach in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China</title><title>Fisheries research</title><description>Instead of the conventional fishery survey-based approach, this study used an ecosystem-based approach to evaluate the ecological impacts of artificial reefs (ARs). Trophic models were initially employed for floating artificial reef area (FARA), traditional artificial reef area (TARA), and reef-free control area (CONA) in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China. Ecosystem-based analyses of FARA and TARA highlighted similar trophic functioning characteristics. A substantial proportion of energy occurred at trophic levels I and II, and most of the primary production was utilized through grazing pathways. As a structuring group, zoobenthos played a pivotal role in enabling pelagic-benthic coupling in both ecosystems. Additionally, the top-down control in the FARA and TARA ecosystems was enhanced. Conventional surveys and comparative ecosystem-based analyses revealed distinct differences between the two ecosystems. In FARA, a significant increase was observed in pelagic fish and zoobenthos, with increases of 3.60- and 4.44-fold, respectively, compared with CONA. Conversely, TARA showed a considerable increase in demersal fish, approximately 2.6 times greater than that of CONA. Based on the biomass disparity between the two ARs, the ecosystem-based approach revealed that the FARA ecosystem led to enhanced energy pathways from detritus, greater total system throughput, higher energy cycle proportion, and more efficient nutrient transfer. Furthermore, the FARA ecosystem showed relatively high stability and maturity (total primary production/total respiration, 1.616<1.946) compared to the TARA ecosystem, suggesting a greater potential to withstand disturbances. Consequently, marine ecosystems respond differently to AR management initiatives. This study emphasizes the reliability of ecosystem-based evaluations during the initial phases of AR construction. Despite being a preliminary pilot study, this study offers insights into the impact on AR ecosystems, especially the role of floating ARs in coastal management.
[Display omitted]
•The ecosystems-based mode evaluated the impacts of ARs on structure and functioning.•The pelagic fish introduced to floating ARs area had notably increased.•Floating ARs ecosystem display improved scale, energy cycling, and nutrient transfer.•The use of floating ARs improved ecosystem stability and maturation.•Floating ARs showed potential for restoring ecological in nearshore waters.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Ecological network analysis</subject><subject>Ecological restoration</subject><subject>Ecopath model</subject><subject>Ecosystem properties</subject><issn>0165-7836</issn><issn>1872-6763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMInIPkDSHFednpCNDylSlzgbG3sNXHVxpFtkPoJ_DWOwp3Tzq5mdneGkOucrXKW89vdytjQewyrghVVmgnW1CdkkTeiyLjg5SlZJF6diabk5-QihB1jTAieL8hP6w4jeBvcQJ2hZu8g2uGTwqBp9KBttG6APQUfrbHKJugRTeoRAv0KM5eicuEYIh6yDgJqCuPoHaie2oHGHukDhB6HCBM7KadTG9eDpRs43tC2twNckjMD-4BXf3VJPp4e39uXbPv2_NrebzOV_MSsLgGAJzdNnhdMsQp1wzul2FromkFXamV0JURTKeDamNpws9a85Iwn1OlySep5r_IuBI9Gjt4ewB9lzuSUp9zJvzzllKec80y6u1mH6blvi14GZXFQqK1HFaV29p8Nv4IjhD0</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Han, Chenglong</creator><creator>Pang, Xiaoke</creator><creator>Liu, Wanni</creator><creator>Fu, Wenjing</creator><creator>Guo, Biao</creator><creator>Kinoshita, Toshihisa</creator><creator>Zheng, Debin</creator><creator>Yamashita, Osamu</creator><creator>Feng, Jianfeng</creator><creator>Lu, Xueqiang</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Comparison of floating and traditional artificial reef areas using an ecosystem-based approach in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China</title><author>Han, Chenglong ; Pang, Xiaoke ; Liu, Wanni ; Fu, Wenjing ; Guo, Biao ; Kinoshita, Toshihisa ; Zheng, Debin ; Yamashita, Osamu ; Feng, Jianfeng ; Lu, Xueqiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-53aaa616581120c04ed86bcc097d50ab3dcfd47784ca6dff5f6f9d63606f6fbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Ecological network analysis</topic><topic>Ecological restoration</topic><topic>Ecopath model</topic><topic>Ecosystem properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Chenglong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pang, Xiaoke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Wenjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Biao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinoshita, Toshihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Debin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamashita, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Jianfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xueqiang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Fisheries research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Chenglong</au><au>Pang, Xiaoke</au><au>Liu, Wanni</au><au>Fu, Wenjing</au><au>Guo, Biao</au><au>Kinoshita, Toshihisa</au><au>Zheng, Debin</au><au>Yamashita, Osamu</au><au>Feng, Jianfeng</au><au>Lu, Xueqiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of floating and traditional artificial reef areas using an ecosystem-based approach in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China</atitle><jtitle>Fisheries research</jtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>277</volume><spage>107085</spage><pages>107085-</pages><artnum>107085</artnum><issn>0165-7836</issn><eissn>1872-6763</eissn><abstract>Instead of the conventional fishery survey-based approach, this study used an ecosystem-based approach to evaluate the ecological impacts of artificial reefs (ARs). Trophic models were initially employed for floating artificial reef area (FARA), traditional artificial reef area (TARA), and reef-free control area (CONA) in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China. Ecosystem-based analyses of FARA and TARA highlighted similar trophic functioning characteristics. A substantial proportion of energy occurred at trophic levels I and II, and most of the primary production was utilized through grazing pathways. As a structuring group, zoobenthos played a pivotal role in enabling pelagic-benthic coupling in both ecosystems. Additionally, the top-down control in the FARA and TARA ecosystems was enhanced. Conventional surveys and comparative ecosystem-based analyses revealed distinct differences between the two ecosystems. In FARA, a significant increase was observed in pelagic fish and zoobenthos, with increases of 3.60- and 4.44-fold, respectively, compared with CONA. Conversely, TARA showed a considerable increase in demersal fish, approximately 2.6 times greater than that of CONA. Based on the biomass disparity between the two ARs, the ecosystem-based approach revealed that the FARA ecosystem led to enhanced energy pathways from detritus, greater total system throughput, higher energy cycle proportion, and more efficient nutrient transfer. Furthermore, the FARA ecosystem showed relatively high stability and maturity (total primary production/total respiration, 1.616<1.946) compared to the TARA ecosystem, suggesting a greater potential to withstand disturbances. Consequently, marine ecosystems respond differently to AR management initiatives. This study emphasizes the reliability of ecosystem-based evaluations during the initial phases of AR construction. Despite being a preliminary pilot study, this study offers insights into the impact on AR ecosystems, especially the role of floating ARs in coastal management.
[Display omitted]
•The ecosystems-based mode evaluated the impacts of ARs on structure and functioning.•The pelagic fish introduced to floating ARs area had notably increased.•Floating ARs ecosystem display improved scale, energy cycling, and nutrient transfer.•The use of floating ARs improved ecosystem stability and maturation.•Floating ARs showed potential for restoring ecological in nearshore waters.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107085</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-7836 |
ispartof | Fisheries research, 2024-09, Vol.277, p.107085, Article 107085 |
issn | 0165-7836 1872-6763 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fishres_2024_107085 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Comparative analysis Ecological network analysis Ecological restoration Ecopath model Ecosystem properties |
title | Comparison of floating and traditional artificial reef areas using an ecosystem-based approach in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A38%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20floating%20and%20traditional%20artificial%20reef%20areas%20using%20an%20ecosystem-based%20approach%20in%20the%20Dashentang%20area%20of%20Bohai%20Bay,%20China&rft.jtitle=Fisheries%20research&rft.au=Han,%20Chenglong&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=277&rft.spage=107085&rft.pages=107085-&rft.artnum=107085&rft.issn=0165-7836&rft.eissn=1872-6763&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107085&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0165783624001498%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-53aaa616581120c04ed86bcc097d50ab3dcfd47784ca6dff5f6f9d63606f6fbd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |