Loading…

Comparison of floating and traditional artificial reef areas using an ecosystem-based approach in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China

Instead of the conventional fishery survey-based approach, this study used an ecosystem-based approach to evaluate the ecological impacts of artificial reefs (ARs). Trophic models were initially employed for floating artificial reef area (FARA), traditional artificial reef area (TARA), and reef-free...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fisheries research 2024-09, Vol.277, p.107085, Article 107085
Main Authors: Han, Chenglong, Pang, Xiaoke, Liu, Wanni, Fu, Wenjing, Guo, Biao, Kinoshita, Toshihisa, Zheng, Debin, Yamashita, Osamu, Feng, Jianfeng, Lu, Xueqiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-53aaa616581120c04ed86bcc097d50ab3dcfd47784ca6dff5f6f9d63606f6fbd3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 107085
container_title Fisheries research
container_volume 277
creator Han, Chenglong
Pang, Xiaoke
Liu, Wanni
Fu, Wenjing
Guo, Biao
Kinoshita, Toshihisa
Zheng, Debin
Yamashita, Osamu
Feng, Jianfeng
Lu, Xueqiang
description Instead of the conventional fishery survey-based approach, this study used an ecosystem-based approach to evaluate the ecological impacts of artificial reefs (ARs). Trophic models were initially employed for floating artificial reef area (FARA), traditional artificial reef area (TARA), and reef-free control area (CONA) in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China. Ecosystem-based analyses of FARA and TARA highlighted similar trophic functioning characteristics. A substantial proportion of energy occurred at trophic levels I and II, and most of the primary production was utilized through grazing pathways. As a structuring group, zoobenthos played a pivotal role in enabling pelagic-benthic coupling in both ecosystems. Additionally, the top-down control in the FARA and TARA ecosystems was enhanced. Conventional surveys and comparative ecosystem-based analyses revealed distinct differences between the two ecosystems. In FARA, a significant increase was observed in pelagic fish and zoobenthos, with increases of 3.60- and 4.44-fold, respectively, compared with CONA. Conversely, TARA showed a considerable increase in demersal fish, approximately 2.6 times greater than that of CONA. Based on the biomass disparity between the two ARs, the ecosystem-based approach revealed that the FARA ecosystem led to enhanced energy pathways from detritus, greater total system throughput, higher energy cycle proportion, and more efficient nutrient transfer. Furthermore, the FARA ecosystem showed relatively high stability and maturity (total primary production/total respiration, 1.616
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107085
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fishres_2024_107085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165783624001498</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0165783624001498</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-53aaa616581120c04ed86bcc097d50ab3dcfd47784ca6dff5f6f9d63606f6fbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMInIPkDSHFednpCNDylSlzgbG3sNXHVxpFtkPoJ_DWOwp3Tzq5mdneGkOucrXKW89vdytjQewyrghVVmgnW1CdkkTeiyLjg5SlZJF6diabk5-QihB1jTAieL8hP6w4jeBvcQJ2hZu8g2uGTwqBp9KBttG6APQUfrbHKJugRTeoRAv0KM5eicuEYIh6yDgJqCuPoHaie2oHGHukDhB6HCBM7KadTG9eDpRs43tC2twNckjMD-4BXf3VJPp4e39uXbPv2_NrebzOV_MSsLgGAJzdNnhdMsQp1wzul2FromkFXamV0JURTKeDamNpws9a85Iwn1OlySep5r_IuBI9Gjt4ewB9lzuSUp9zJvzzllKec80y6u1mH6blvi14GZXFQqK1HFaV29p8Nv4IjhD0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of floating and traditional artificial reef areas using an ecosystem-based approach in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Han, Chenglong ; Pang, Xiaoke ; Liu, Wanni ; Fu, Wenjing ; Guo, Biao ; Kinoshita, Toshihisa ; Zheng, Debin ; Yamashita, Osamu ; Feng, Jianfeng ; Lu, Xueqiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Han, Chenglong ; Pang, Xiaoke ; Liu, Wanni ; Fu, Wenjing ; Guo, Biao ; Kinoshita, Toshihisa ; Zheng, Debin ; Yamashita, Osamu ; Feng, Jianfeng ; Lu, Xueqiang</creatorcontrib><description>Instead of the conventional fishery survey-based approach, this study used an ecosystem-based approach to evaluate the ecological impacts of artificial reefs (ARs). Trophic models were initially employed for floating artificial reef area (FARA), traditional artificial reef area (TARA), and reef-free control area (CONA) in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China. Ecosystem-based analyses of FARA and TARA highlighted similar trophic functioning characteristics. A substantial proportion of energy occurred at trophic levels I and II, and most of the primary production was utilized through grazing pathways. As a structuring group, zoobenthos played a pivotal role in enabling pelagic-benthic coupling in both ecosystems. Additionally, the top-down control in the FARA and TARA ecosystems was enhanced. Conventional surveys and comparative ecosystem-based analyses revealed distinct differences between the two ecosystems. In FARA, a significant increase was observed in pelagic fish and zoobenthos, with increases of 3.60- and 4.44-fold, respectively, compared with CONA. Conversely, TARA showed a considerable increase in demersal fish, approximately 2.6 times greater than that of CONA. Based on the biomass disparity between the two ARs, the ecosystem-based approach revealed that the FARA ecosystem led to enhanced energy pathways from detritus, greater total system throughput, higher energy cycle proportion, and more efficient nutrient transfer. Furthermore, the FARA ecosystem showed relatively high stability and maturity (total primary production/total respiration, 1.616&lt;1.946) compared to the TARA ecosystem, suggesting a greater potential to withstand disturbances. Consequently, marine ecosystems respond differently to AR management initiatives. This study emphasizes the reliability of ecosystem-based evaluations during the initial phases of AR construction. Despite being a preliminary pilot study, this study offers insights into the impact on AR ecosystems, especially the role of floating ARs in coastal management. [Display omitted] •The ecosystems-based mode evaluated the impacts of ARs on structure and functioning.•The pelagic fish introduced to floating ARs area had notably increased.•Floating ARs ecosystem display improved scale, energy cycling, and nutrient transfer.•The use of floating ARs improved ecosystem stability and maturation.•Floating ARs showed potential for restoring ecological in nearshore waters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-7836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6763</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Ecological network analysis ; Ecological restoration ; Ecopath model ; Ecosystem properties</subject><ispartof>Fisheries research, 2024-09, Vol.277, p.107085, Article 107085</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-53aaa616581120c04ed86bcc097d50ab3dcfd47784ca6dff5f6f9d63606f6fbd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Han, Chenglong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pang, Xiaoke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Wenjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Biao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinoshita, Toshihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Debin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamashita, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Jianfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xueqiang</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of floating and traditional artificial reef areas using an ecosystem-based approach in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China</title><title>Fisheries research</title><description>Instead of the conventional fishery survey-based approach, this study used an ecosystem-based approach to evaluate the ecological impacts of artificial reefs (ARs). Trophic models were initially employed for floating artificial reef area (FARA), traditional artificial reef area (TARA), and reef-free control area (CONA) in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China. Ecosystem-based analyses of FARA and TARA highlighted similar trophic functioning characteristics. A substantial proportion of energy occurred at trophic levels I and II, and most of the primary production was utilized through grazing pathways. As a structuring group, zoobenthos played a pivotal role in enabling pelagic-benthic coupling in both ecosystems. Additionally, the top-down control in the FARA and TARA ecosystems was enhanced. Conventional surveys and comparative ecosystem-based analyses revealed distinct differences between the two ecosystems. In FARA, a significant increase was observed in pelagic fish and zoobenthos, with increases of 3.60- and 4.44-fold, respectively, compared with CONA. Conversely, TARA showed a considerable increase in demersal fish, approximately 2.6 times greater than that of CONA. Based on the biomass disparity between the two ARs, the ecosystem-based approach revealed that the FARA ecosystem led to enhanced energy pathways from detritus, greater total system throughput, higher energy cycle proportion, and more efficient nutrient transfer. Furthermore, the FARA ecosystem showed relatively high stability and maturity (total primary production/total respiration, 1.616&lt;1.946) compared to the TARA ecosystem, suggesting a greater potential to withstand disturbances. Consequently, marine ecosystems respond differently to AR management initiatives. This study emphasizes the reliability of ecosystem-based evaluations during the initial phases of AR construction. Despite being a preliminary pilot study, this study offers insights into the impact on AR ecosystems, especially the role of floating ARs in coastal management. [Display omitted] •The ecosystems-based mode evaluated the impacts of ARs on structure and functioning.•The pelagic fish introduced to floating ARs area had notably increased.•Floating ARs ecosystem display improved scale, energy cycling, and nutrient transfer.•The use of floating ARs improved ecosystem stability and maturation.•Floating ARs showed potential for restoring ecological in nearshore waters.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Ecological network analysis</subject><subject>Ecological restoration</subject><subject>Ecopath model</subject><subject>Ecosystem properties</subject><issn>0165-7836</issn><issn>1872-6763</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMtOwzAQtBBIlMInIPkDSHFednpCNDylSlzgbG3sNXHVxpFtkPoJ_DWOwp3Tzq5mdneGkOucrXKW89vdytjQewyrghVVmgnW1CdkkTeiyLjg5SlZJF6diabk5-QihB1jTAieL8hP6w4jeBvcQJ2hZu8g2uGTwqBp9KBttG6APQUfrbHKJugRTeoRAv0KM5eicuEYIh6yDgJqCuPoHaie2oHGHukDhB6HCBM7KadTG9eDpRs43tC2twNckjMD-4BXf3VJPp4e39uXbPv2_NrebzOV_MSsLgGAJzdNnhdMsQp1wzul2FromkFXamV0JURTKeDamNpws9a85Iwn1OlySep5r_IuBI9Gjt4ewB9lzuSUp9zJvzzllKec80y6u1mH6blvi14GZXFQqK1HFaV29p8Nv4IjhD0</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Han, Chenglong</creator><creator>Pang, Xiaoke</creator><creator>Liu, Wanni</creator><creator>Fu, Wenjing</creator><creator>Guo, Biao</creator><creator>Kinoshita, Toshihisa</creator><creator>Zheng, Debin</creator><creator>Yamashita, Osamu</creator><creator>Feng, Jianfeng</creator><creator>Lu, Xueqiang</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Comparison of floating and traditional artificial reef areas using an ecosystem-based approach in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China</title><author>Han, Chenglong ; Pang, Xiaoke ; Liu, Wanni ; Fu, Wenjing ; Guo, Biao ; Kinoshita, Toshihisa ; Zheng, Debin ; Yamashita, Osamu ; Feng, Jianfeng ; Lu, Xueqiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-53aaa616581120c04ed86bcc097d50ab3dcfd47784ca6dff5f6f9d63606f6fbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Ecological network analysis</topic><topic>Ecological restoration</topic><topic>Ecopath model</topic><topic>Ecosystem properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Chenglong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pang, Xiaoke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Wanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Wenjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Biao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinoshita, Toshihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Debin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamashita, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Jianfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Xueqiang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Fisheries research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Chenglong</au><au>Pang, Xiaoke</au><au>Liu, Wanni</au><au>Fu, Wenjing</au><au>Guo, Biao</au><au>Kinoshita, Toshihisa</au><au>Zheng, Debin</au><au>Yamashita, Osamu</au><au>Feng, Jianfeng</au><au>Lu, Xueqiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of floating and traditional artificial reef areas using an ecosystem-based approach in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China</atitle><jtitle>Fisheries research</jtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>277</volume><spage>107085</spage><pages>107085-</pages><artnum>107085</artnum><issn>0165-7836</issn><eissn>1872-6763</eissn><abstract>Instead of the conventional fishery survey-based approach, this study used an ecosystem-based approach to evaluate the ecological impacts of artificial reefs (ARs). Trophic models were initially employed for floating artificial reef area (FARA), traditional artificial reef area (TARA), and reef-free control area (CONA) in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China. Ecosystem-based analyses of FARA and TARA highlighted similar trophic functioning characteristics. A substantial proportion of energy occurred at trophic levels I and II, and most of the primary production was utilized through grazing pathways. As a structuring group, zoobenthos played a pivotal role in enabling pelagic-benthic coupling in both ecosystems. Additionally, the top-down control in the FARA and TARA ecosystems was enhanced. Conventional surveys and comparative ecosystem-based analyses revealed distinct differences between the two ecosystems. In FARA, a significant increase was observed in pelagic fish and zoobenthos, with increases of 3.60- and 4.44-fold, respectively, compared with CONA. Conversely, TARA showed a considerable increase in demersal fish, approximately 2.6 times greater than that of CONA. Based on the biomass disparity between the two ARs, the ecosystem-based approach revealed that the FARA ecosystem led to enhanced energy pathways from detritus, greater total system throughput, higher energy cycle proportion, and more efficient nutrient transfer. Furthermore, the FARA ecosystem showed relatively high stability and maturity (total primary production/total respiration, 1.616&lt;1.946) compared to the TARA ecosystem, suggesting a greater potential to withstand disturbances. Consequently, marine ecosystems respond differently to AR management initiatives. This study emphasizes the reliability of ecosystem-based evaluations during the initial phases of AR construction. Despite being a preliminary pilot study, this study offers insights into the impact on AR ecosystems, especially the role of floating ARs in coastal management. [Display omitted] •The ecosystems-based mode evaluated the impacts of ARs on structure and functioning.•The pelagic fish introduced to floating ARs area had notably increased.•Floating ARs ecosystem display improved scale, energy cycling, and nutrient transfer.•The use of floating ARs improved ecosystem stability and maturation.•Floating ARs showed potential for restoring ecological in nearshore waters.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107085</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-7836
ispartof Fisheries research, 2024-09, Vol.277, p.107085, Article 107085
issn 0165-7836
1872-6763
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fishres_2024_107085
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Comparative analysis
Ecological network analysis
Ecological restoration
Ecopath model
Ecosystem properties
title Comparison of floating and traditional artificial reef areas using an ecosystem-based approach in the Dashentang area of Bohai Bay, China
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A38%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20floating%20and%20traditional%20artificial%20reef%20areas%20using%20an%20ecosystem-based%20approach%20in%20the%20Dashentang%20area%20of%20Bohai%20Bay,%20China&rft.jtitle=Fisheries%20research&rft.au=Han,%20Chenglong&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=277&rft.spage=107085&rft.pages=107085-&rft.artnum=107085&rft.issn=0165-7836&rft.eissn=1872-6763&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fishres.2024.107085&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0165783624001498%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-53aaa616581120c04ed86bcc097d50ab3dcfd47784ca6dff5f6f9d63606f6fbd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true