Comment on “The Debye-Hückel theory and its importance in modeling electrolyte solutions”

In a recent review by Kontogeorgis et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 462 (2018) 130–152] many debatable issues concerning the Debye-Hückel theory and modeling electrolyte solutions are discussed. The goal of this comment is to complement this survey with a short summary of the extended Debye-Hückel theor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fluid phase equilibria 2019-04, Vol.485, p.248-250
Main Authors: Shilov, Ignat Yu, Lyashchenko, Andrey K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Born theory
Debye-Hückel theory
Electrolyte solution
Modeling
Permittivity
Solvation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In a recent review by Kontogeorgis et al. [Fluid Phase Equilib. 462 (2018) 130–152] many debatable issues concerning the Debye-Hückel theory and modeling electrolyte solutions are discussed. The goal of this comment is to complement this survey with a short summary of the extended Debye-Hückel theory [I.Yu. Shilov, A.K. Lyashchenko, 2015] which allows for an arbitrary variation of electrolyte solution static permittivity with concentration and thus sheds new light on the interrelation between the Debye-Hückel theory and the Born theory of solvation.
ISSN:0378-3812
1879-0224
DOI:10.1016/j.fluid.2018.12.019