Loading…

Simultaneous analysis of twenty-six mycotoxins in durum wheat grain from Italy

A multi-mycotoxin analysis method based on liquid chromatography coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometry was validated and applied for the determination of twenty-six mycotoxins, including eight trichothecenes, three fumonisins, sterigmatocystin, ochratoxin A, four aflatoxins, zearalenone, fi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food control 2016-04, Vol.62, p.322-329
Main Authors: Juan, Cristina, Covarelli, Lorenzo, Beccari, Giovanni, Colasante, Valerio, Mañes, Jordi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A multi-mycotoxin analysis method based on liquid chromatography coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometry was validated and applied for the determination of twenty-six mycotoxins, including eight trichothecenes, three fumonisins, sterigmatocystin, ochratoxin A, four aflatoxins, zearalenone, five “emerging” mycotoxins and three Alternaria mycotoxins in 74 durum wheat samples from central Italy. Eighty-eight percent of the analysed samples contained one or more mycotoxins, with enniatin B showing the highest contamination levels (78% of samples with levels ranging from 23 to 1826 ng/g), followed by enniatin B1 (10–1384 ng/g) and deoxynivalenol (48–2267 ng/g). This work gives an important contribution in terms of mycotoxin analysis and occurrence in durum wheat and in assessing the mycotoxicological risk posed by both traditional and emerging mycotoxins for the final consumers of durum wheat derived products. •LC-MS/MS method is used for the determination of 26 mycotoxins in durum wheat.•A total of 74 samples from Italy were analyzed.•The most prevalent mycotoxin present in analyzed samples was Enniatin B (78%).•Deoxynivalenol (legislated mycotoxin) was detected in the 16% of analyzed samples.
ISSN:0956-7135
1873-7129
DOI:10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.10.032