Comparative study of imported food control systems of Taiwan, Japan, the United States, and the European Union

• Published in: Food control 2017-08, Vol.78, p.331-341
• Main Authors: Ndraha, Nodali, Hsiao, Hsin-I, Chih Wang, Wayne Chung
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Food safety; Food safety management; Imported food; Legislation; Public health
• ISSN: 0956-7135; 1873-7129
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.02.051

The growth of the global food trade has increased significantly over the last two decades. The purpose of this review paper is to compare imported food safety controls in Taiwan, Japan, the United States, and the European Union. Our key findings are: 1) imported food of animal and non-animal origin is by separate, competent authorities in Taiwan, Japan, and the US, whereas it is controlled by a single authority in the EU, 2) foreign facilities require registration in the US and Japan, 3) importing high-risk food in the EU, Taiwan and Japan requires the competent authority to inspect the food chain process and facilities in the third country, whereas a US FDA’s accredited third party auditor can do so in the US, 4) an advanced developed support systems for enabling the effectiveness and efficiency of imported food control can only be found in the EU and US. These findings may help the competent authorities responsible for imported food safety in Taiwan and the other countries to develop and enhance their own systems, not only to meet the international standards but importantly for the sake of public health protection. •The imported food control in Taiwan, Japan, the United States and the European Union are reviewed.•An advance developed support systems supporting imported food control is found in the EU and US.•The control of imported food has been shifted from checking at point of entry to on-site inspection.