Loading…

How chemophobia affects public acceptance of pesticide use and biotechnology in agriculture

•Gene transfers between varieties of the same plant might be accepted by consumers.•Chemophobics might reject pesticide use and biotechnology applications in agriculture.•Addressing chemophobia and ensuring public trust in agricultural policies is needed. Protecting crops from infestations is critic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food quality and preference 2021-07, Vol.91, p.104197, Article 104197
Main Authors: Saleh, Rita, Bearth, Angela, Siegrist, Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-74f6d21755edd4af0d4b9f6df457370057d7e4a204b896485eda3501a6002b773
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-74f6d21755edd4af0d4b9f6df457370057d7e4a204b896485eda3501a6002b773
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 104197
container_title Food quality and preference
container_volume 91
creator Saleh, Rita
Bearth, Angela
Siegrist, Michael
description •Gene transfers between varieties of the same plant might be accepted by consumers.•Chemophobics might reject pesticide use and biotechnology applications in agriculture.•Addressing chemophobia and ensuring public trust in agricultural policies is needed. Protecting crops from infestations is critical to ensuring stable, safe food production. However, many consumers are concerned about the use of pesticides and agricultural biotechnology (agri-biotech) applications. A lack of consumer acceptance can prevent potentially beneficial applications from being utilized. This study examines consumer acceptance of pesticide use in conventional and organic agriculture and agri-biotech applications as crop-protection measures. An online between-subject experiment was conducted with participants from the German-speaking part of Switzerland (N = 643). The results revealed that consumers were most willing to accept gene transfers as a protection measure, provided the gene came from a wild variety of the same species as the cultivated plant. Both chemophobia and the importance of naturalness in food influence consumer acceptance of pesticide use and agri-biotech applications. Addressing chemophobia and informing consumers about the role of technologies in pest-management and crop-protection could lead them to trust and accept related agricultural policies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104197
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2021_104197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0950329321000240</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0950329321000240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-74f6d21755edd4af0d4b9f6df457370057d7e4a204b896485eda3501a6002b773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFOwzAQRC0EEqXwC8g_kLKOnbi5gSqgSJW4wImD5djrxlUaBzsB9e9JVThzWmm0M5p5hNwyWDBg5d1u4UKwn6NuFznkbBIFq-QZmbGl5FnJBT8nM6gKyHhe8UtyldIOgElg-Yx8rMM3NQ3uQ9-E2muqnUMzJNqPdesN1cZgP-jOIA2O9pgGb7xFOiakurO09mFA03ShDdsD9R3V2-jN2A5jxGty4XSb8Ob3zsn70-Pbap1tXp9fVg-bzAgmhkwKV9qcyaJAa4V2YEVdTZITheQSoJBWotA5iHpZlWI5vWleANMlQF5LyeekPOWaGFKK6FQf_V7Hg2KgjojUTv0hUkdE6oRoMt6fjDi1-_IYVTIep63WxwmCssH_F_ED7JJ0Mw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>How chemophobia affects public acceptance of pesticide use and biotechnology in agriculture</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Saleh, Rita ; Bearth, Angela ; Siegrist, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Rita ; Bearth, Angela ; Siegrist, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>•Gene transfers between varieties of the same plant might be accepted by consumers.•Chemophobics might reject pesticide use and biotechnology applications in agriculture.•Addressing chemophobia and ensuring public trust in agricultural policies is needed. Protecting crops from infestations is critical to ensuring stable, safe food production. However, many consumers are concerned about the use of pesticides and agricultural biotechnology (agri-biotech) applications. A lack of consumer acceptance can prevent potentially beneficial applications from being utilized. This study examines consumer acceptance of pesticide use in conventional and organic agriculture and agri-biotech applications as crop-protection measures. An online between-subject experiment was conducted with participants from the German-speaking part of Switzerland (N = 643). The results revealed that consumers were most willing to accept gene transfers as a protection measure, provided the gene came from a wild variety of the same species as the cultivated plant. Both chemophobia and the importance of naturalness in food influence consumer acceptance of pesticide use and agri-biotech applications. Addressing chemophobia and informing consumers about the role of technologies in pest-management and crop-protection could lead them to trust and accept related agricultural policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-3293</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6343</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104197</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural biotechnology ; Gene editing ; Gene modification ; Pesticides ; Public acceptance</subject><ispartof>Food quality and preference, 2021-07, Vol.91, p.104197, Article 104197</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-74f6d21755edd4af0d4b9f6df457370057d7e4a204b896485eda3501a6002b773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-74f6d21755edd4af0d4b9f6df457370057d7e4a204b896485eda3501a6002b773</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1270-6468</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bearth, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegrist, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>How chemophobia affects public acceptance of pesticide use and biotechnology in agriculture</title><title>Food quality and preference</title><description>•Gene transfers between varieties of the same plant might be accepted by consumers.•Chemophobics might reject pesticide use and biotechnology applications in agriculture.•Addressing chemophobia and ensuring public trust in agricultural policies is needed. Protecting crops from infestations is critical to ensuring stable, safe food production. However, many consumers are concerned about the use of pesticides and agricultural biotechnology (agri-biotech) applications. A lack of consumer acceptance can prevent potentially beneficial applications from being utilized. This study examines consumer acceptance of pesticide use in conventional and organic agriculture and agri-biotech applications as crop-protection measures. An online between-subject experiment was conducted with participants from the German-speaking part of Switzerland (N = 643). The results revealed that consumers were most willing to accept gene transfers as a protection measure, provided the gene came from a wild variety of the same species as the cultivated plant. Both chemophobia and the importance of naturalness in food influence consumer acceptance of pesticide use and agri-biotech applications. Addressing chemophobia and informing consumers about the role of technologies in pest-management and crop-protection could lead them to trust and accept related agricultural policies.</description><subject>Agricultural biotechnology</subject><subject>Gene editing</subject><subject>Gene modification</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Public acceptance</subject><issn>0950-3293</issn><issn>1873-6343</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFOwzAQRC0EEqXwC8g_kLKOnbi5gSqgSJW4wImD5djrxlUaBzsB9e9JVThzWmm0M5p5hNwyWDBg5d1u4UKwn6NuFznkbBIFq-QZmbGl5FnJBT8nM6gKyHhe8UtyldIOgElg-Yx8rMM3NQ3uQ9-E2muqnUMzJNqPdesN1cZgP-jOIA2O9pgGb7xFOiakurO09mFA03ShDdsD9R3V2-jN2A5jxGty4XSb8Ob3zsn70-Pbap1tXp9fVg-bzAgmhkwKV9qcyaJAa4V2YEVdTZITheQSoJBWotA5iHpZlWI5vWleANMlQF5LyeekPOWaGFKK6FQf_V7Hg2KgjojUTv0hUkdE6oRoMt6fjDi1-_IYVTIep63WxwmCssH_F_ED7JJ0Mw</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Saleh, Rita</creator><creator>Bearth, Angela</creator><creator>Siegrist, Michael</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1270-6468</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>How chemophobia affects public acceptance of pesticide use and biotechnology in agriculture</title><author>Saleh, Rita ; Bearth, Angela ; Siegrist, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-74f6d21755edd4af0d4b9f6df457370057d7e4a204b896485eda3501a6002b773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural biotechnology</topic><topic>Gene editing</topic><topic>Gene modification</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Public acceptance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saleh, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bearth, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegrist, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Food quality and preference</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saleh, Rita</au><au>Bearth, Angela</au><au>Siegrist, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How chemophobia affects public acceptance of pesticide use and biotechnology in agriculture</atitle><jtitle>Food quality and preference</jtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>91</volume><spage>104197</spage><pages>104197-</pages><artnum>104197</artnum><issn>0950-3293</issn><eissn>1873-6343</eissn><abstract>•Gene transfers between varieties of the same plant might be accepted by consumers.•Chemophobics might reject pesticide use and biotechnology applications in agriculture.•Addressing chemophobia and ensuring public trust in agricultural policies is needed. Protecting crops from infestations is critical to ensuring stable, safe food production. However, many consumers are concerned about the use of pesticides and agricultural biotechnology (agri-biotech) applications. A lack of consumer acceptance can prevent potentially beneficial applications from being utilized. This study examines consumer acceptance of pesticide use in conventional and organic agriculture and agri-biotech applications as crop-protection measures. An online between-subject experiment was conducted with participants from the German-speaking part of Switzerland (N = 643). The results revealed that consumers were most willing to accept gene transfers as a protection measure, provided the gene came from a wild variety of the same species as the cultivated plant. Both chemophobia and the importance of naturalness in food influence consumer acceptance of pesticide use and agri-biotech applications. Addressing chemophobia and informing consumers about the role of technologies in pest-management and crop-protection could lead them to trust and accept related agricultural policies.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104197</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1270-6468</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-3293
ispartof Food quality and preference, 2021-07, Vol.91, p.104197, Article 104197
issn 0950-3293
1873-6343
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2021_104197
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Agricultural biotechnology
Gene editing
Gene modification
Pesticides
Public acceptance
title How chemophobia affects public acceptance of pesticide use and biotechnology in agriculture
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T07%3A35%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20chemophobia%20affects%20public%20acceptance%20of%20pesticide%20use%20and%20biotechnology%20in%20agriculture&rft.jtitle=Food%20quality%20and%20preference&rft.au=Saleh,%20Rita&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=91&rft.spage=104197&rft.pages=104197-&rft.artnum=104197&rft.issn=0950-3293&rft.eissn=1873-6343&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104197&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0950329321000240%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-74f6d21755edd4af0d4b9f6df457370057d7e4a204b896485eda3501a6002b773%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true