Loading…

Not too ugly to be tasty: Guiding consumer food inferences for the greater good

•Consumers are unwilling to buy or eat suboptimal food, leading to food waste.•Consumers find well-formed produce vs. deformed produce to be more aesthetically pleasing and this leads to more positive consumer inferences of taste, health, and quality.•Consumer inferences contribute to perceptions of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food quality and preference 2021-09, Vol.92, p.104218, Article 104218
Main Authors: Pfeiffer, Bruce E., Sundar, Aparna, Deval, Hélène
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-453663a42cdd7c4e07ac02a03191e16589b10ea4242bff1acecb16de6e76bb6f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-453663a42cdd7c4e07ac02a03191e16589b10ea4242bff1acecb16de6e76bb6f3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 104218
container_title Food quality and preference
container_volume 92
creator Pfeiffer, Bruce E.
Sundar, Aparna
Deval, Hélène
description •Consumers are unwilling to buy or eat suboptimal food, leading to food waste.•Consumers find well-formed produce vs. deformed produce to be more aesthetically pleasing and this leads to more positive consumer inferences of taste, health, and quality.•Consumer inferences contribute to perceptions of seller competence.•The effects of form on consumer inferences may depend on different distribution channels (grocery vs. farmers market). The issue of food waste is an important societal challenge with a significant environmental impact. An important issue contributing to food waste is consumers’ unwillingness to purchase suboptimal food. Past literature has shown that people prefer perfectly formed food to abnormally shaped food when given a choice, but much of the mechanism underlying this preference is not well documented. Using a framework based on the halo effect, the authors focus on consumers affective and cognitive responses that cause them to shy away from produce that does not meet the usual aesthetic criteria. Results demonstrate that consumers find well-formed produce vs. deformed produce to be more aesthetically pleasing (beautiful) and that this positive affective reaction leads to more positive consumer inferences of taste, health, and quality. Results also indicate that consumers view sellers of well-formed produce to be more competent than sellers of deformed produce and that this perception is driven by perceptions of beauty and consumer inferences of taste, health, and quality. Lastly, results show that the effects of form on consumer inferences may depend on different distribution channels. Shopping at a farmers market mitigates the impact of the deformation on consumer inferences. Given that form and actual taste, health, and quality are not generally correlated, the results indicate that consumers are making inaccurate inferences. Exploring these inferences has the potential to open new avenues to educate consumers.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104218
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2021_104218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0950329321000458</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0950329321000458</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-453663a42cdd7c4e07ac02a03191e16589b10ea4242bff1acecb16de6e76bb6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwC8g_kOKxU6dhBaqgIFV0A2vLsSfBVRuD7SD173HUsmY1j6s7j0PILbAZMJB321nrvf0e9G7GGYfcLDkszsgEFpUopCjFOZmwes4KwWtxSa5i3DIGFQM-IZs3n2jyng7d7pAT2iBNOqbDPV0Nzrq-o8b3cdhjoOMa6voWA_YGY64DTZ9Iu4A6Zb3L-jW5aPUu4s0pTsnH89P78qVYb1avy8d1YQTwVJRzIaXQJTfWVqZEVmnDuGYCakCQ80XdAMOsl7xpW9AGTQPSosRKNo1sxZTI41wTfIwBW_UV3F6HgwKmRixqq_6wqBGLOmLJxoejEfN1Pw6DisaN_1gX0CRlvftvxC8sfW-2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Not too ugly to be tasty: Guiding consumer food inferences for the greater good</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pfeiffer, Bruce E. ; Sundar, Aparna ; Deval, Hélène</creator><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Bruce E. ; Sundar, Aparna ; Deval, Hélène</creatorcontrib><description>•Consumers are unwilling to buy or eat suboptimal food, leading to food waste.•Consumers find well-formed produce vs. deformed produce to be more aesthetically pleasing and this leads to more positive consumer inferences of taste, health, and quality.•Consumer inferences contribute to perceptions of seller competence.•The effects of form on consumer inferences may depend on different distribution channels (grocery vs. farmers market). The issue of food waste is an important societal challenge with a significant environmental impact. An important issue contributing to food waste is consumers’ unwillingness to purchase suboptimal food. Past literature has shown that people prefer perfectly formed food to abnormally shaped food when given a choice, but much of the mechanism underlying this preference is not well documented. Using a framework based on the halo effect, the authors focus on consumers affective and cognitive responses that cause them to shy away from produce that does not meet the usual aesthetic criteria. Results demonstrate that consumers find well-formed produce vs. deformed produce to be more aesthetically pleasing (beautiful) and that this positive affective reaction leads to more positive consumer inferences of taste, health, and quality. Results also indicate that consumers view sellers of well-formed produce to be more competent than sellers of deformed produce and that this perception is driven by perceptions of beauty and consumer inferences of taste, health, and quality. Lastly, results show that the effects of form on consumer inferences may depend on different distribution channels. Shopping at a farmers market mitigates the impact of the deformation on consumer inferences. Given that form and actual taste, health, and quality are not generally correlated, the results indicate that consumers are making inaccurate inferences. Exploring these inferences has the potential to open new avenues to educate consumers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-3293</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6343</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104218</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Consumer inference ; Food waste ; Halo effect ; Perceptual aesthetics ; Suboptimal foods</subject><ispartof>Food quality and preference, 2021-09, Vol.92, p.104218, Article 104218</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-453663a42cdd7c4e07ac02a03191e16589b10ea4242bff1acecb16de6e76bb6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-453663a42cdd7c4e07ac02a03191e16589b10ea4242bff1acecb16de6e76bb6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9648-9255</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Bruce E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundar, Aparna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deval, Hélène</creatorcontrib><title>Not too ugly to be tasty: Guiding consumer food inferences for the greater good</title><title>Food quality and preference</title><description>•Consumers are unwilling to buy or eat suboptimal food, leading to food waste.•Consumers find well-formed produce vs. deformed produce to be more aesthetically pleasing and this leads to more positive consumer inferences of taste, health, and quality.•Consumer inferences contribute to perceptions of seller competence.•The effects of form on consumer inferences may depend on different distribution channels (grocery vs. farmers market). The issue of food waste is an important societal challenge with a significant environmental impact. An important issue contributing to food waste is consumers’ unwillingness to purchase suboptimal food. Past literature has shown that people prefer perfectly formed food to abnormally shaped food when given a choice, but much of the mechanism underlying this preference is not well documented. Using a framework based on the halo effect, the authors focus on consumers affective and cognitive responses that cause them to shy away from produce that does not meet the usual aesthetic criteria. Results demonstrate that consumers find well-formed produce vs. deformed produce to be more aesthetically pleasing (beautiful) and that this positive affective reaction leads to more positive consumer inferences of taste, health, and quality. Results also indicate that consumers view sellers of well-formed produce to be more competent than sellers of deformed produce and that this perception is driven by perceptions of beauty and consumer inferences of taste, health, and quality. Lastly, results show that the effects of form on consumer inferences may depend on different distribution channels. Shopping at a farmers market mitigates the impact of the deformation on consumer inferences. Given that form and actual taste, health, and quality are not generally correlated, the results indicate that consumers are making inaccurate inferences. Exploring these inferences has the potential to open new avenues to educate consumers.</description><subject>Consumer inference</subject><subject>Food waste</subject><subject>Halo effect</subject><subject>Perceptual aesthetics</subject><subject>Suboptimal foods</subject><issn>0950-3293</issn><issn>1873-6343</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwC8g_kOKxU6dhBaqgIFV0A2vLsSfBVRuD7SD173HUsmY1j6s7j0PILbAZMJB321nrvf0e9G7GGYfcLDkszsgEFpUopCjFOZmwes4KwWtxSa5i3DIGFQM-IZs3n2jyng7d7pAT2iBNOqbDPV0Nzrq-o8b3cdhjoOMa6voWA_YGY64DTZ9Iu4A6Zb3L-jW5aPUu4s0pTsnH89P78qVYb1avy8d1YQTwVJRzIaXQJTfWVqZEVmnDuGYCakCQ80XdAMOsl7xpW9AGTQPSosRKNo1sxZTI41wTfIwBW_UV3F6HgwKmRixqq_6wqBGLOmLJxoejEfN1Pw6DisaN_1gX0CRlvftvxC8sfW-2</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Pfeiffer, Bruce E.</creator><creator>Sundar, Aparna</creator><creator>Deval, Hélène</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9648-9255</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Not too ugly to be tasty: Guiding consumer food inferences for the greater good</title><author>Pfeiffer, Bruce E. ; Sundar, Aparna ; Deval, Hélène</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-453663a42cdd7c4e07ac02a03191e16589b10ea4242bff1acecb16de6e76bb6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Consumer inference</topic><topic>Food waste</topic><topic>Halo effect</topic><topic>Perceptual aesthetics</topic><topic>Suboptimal foods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Bruce E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundar, Aparna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deval, Hélène</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Food quality and preference</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pfeiffer, Bruce E.</au><au>Sundar, Aparna</au><au>Deval, Hélène</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Not too ugly to be tasty: Guiding consumer food inferences for the greater good</atitle><jtitle>Food quality and preference</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>92</volume><spage>104218</spage><pages>104218-</pages><artnum>104218</artnum><issn>0950-3293</issn><eissn>1873-6343</eissn><abstract>•Consumers are unwilling to buy or eat suboptimal food, leading to food waste.•Consumers find well-formed produce vs. deformed produce to be more aesthetically pleasing and this leads to more positive consumer inferences of taste, health, and quality.•Consumer inferences contribute to perceptions of seller competence.•The effects of form on consumer inferences may depend on different distribution channels (grocery vs. farmers market). The issue of food waste is an important societal challenge with a significant environmental impact. An important issue contributing to food waste is consumers’ unwillingness to purchase suboptimal food. Past literature has shown that people prefer perfectly formed food to abnormally shaped food when given a choice, but much of the mechanism underlying this preference is not well documented. Using a framework based on the halo effect, the authors focus on consumers affective and cognitive responses that cause them to shy away from produce that does not meet the usual aesthetic criteria. Results demonstrate that consumers find well-formed produce vs. deformed produce to be more aesthetically pleasing (beautiful) and that this positive affective reaction leads to more positive consumer inferences of taste, health, and quality. Results also indicate that consumers view sellers of well-formed produce to be more competent than sellers of deformed produce and that this perception is driven by perceptions of beauty and consumer inferences of taste, health, and quality. Lastly, results show that the effects of form on consumer inferences may depend on different distribution channels. Shopping at a farmers market mitigates the impact of the deformation on consumer inferences. Given that form and actual taste, health, and quality are not generally correlated, the results indicate that consumers are making inaccurate inferences. Exploring these inferences has the potential to open new avenues to educate consumers.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104218</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9648-9255</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-3293
ispartof Food quality and preference, 2021-09, Vol.92, p.104218, Article 104218
issn 0950-3293
1873-6343
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodqual_2021_104218
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Consumer inference
Food waste
Halo effect
Perceptual aesthetics
Suboptimal foods
title Not too ugly to be tasty: Guiding consumer food inferences for the greater good
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T10%3A18%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Not%20too%20ugly%20to%20be%20tasty:%20Guiding%20consumer%20food%20inferences%20for%20the%20greater%20good&rft.jtitle=Food%20quality%20and%20preference&rft.au=Pfeiffer,%20Bruce%20E.&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=92&rft.spage=104218&rft.pages=104218-&rft.artnum=104218&rft.issn=0950-3293&rft.eissn=1873-6343&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104218&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0950329321000458%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-453663a42cdd7c4e07ac02a03191e16589b10ea4242bff1acecb16de6e76bb6f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true