High-resolution mapping of forest vulnerability to wind for disturbance-aware forestry

• Published in: Forest ecology and management 2019-12, Vol.453, p.117619, Article 117619
• Main Authors: Suvanto, Susanne, Peltoniemi, Mikko, Tuominen, Sakari, Strandström, Mikael, Lehtonen, Aleksi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Forest disturbances; Forest management; Storm damage; Tree mortality; Windthrow
• ISSN: 0378-1127; 1872-7042
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117619

•We created a forest wind sensitivity map by using statistical models and GIS data.•We compared three modelling methods and tested them with independent data.•More complex methods did not improve results compared to a generalized linear model.•The created maps were able to identify vulnerable forests in independent test data.•The map can be used for better consideration of damage risks in forest management. Windstorms cause major disturbances in European forests. Forest management can play a key role in making forests more persistent to disturbances. However, better information is needed to support decision making that effectively accounts for wind disturbances. Here we show how empirical probability models of wind damage, combined with existing spatial data sets, can be used to provide fine-scale spatial information about disturbance probability over large areas. First, we created stand-level damage probability models using wind damage observations within 5-year time window in national forest inventory data (NFI). Model predictors described forest characteristics, forest management history, 10-year return-rate of maximum wind speed, and soil, site and climate conditions. We tested three different methods for creating the damage probability models – generalized linear models (GLM), generalized additive models (GAM) and boosted regression trees (BRT). Then, damage probability maps were calculated by combining the models with GIS data sets representing the model predictors. Finally, we demonstrated the predictive performance of the damage probability maps with a large, independent test data of over 33,000 NFI plots, which shows that the maps are able to identify vulnerable forests also in new wind damage events, with area under curve value (AUC) > 0.7. Use of the more complex methods (GAM and BRT) was not found to improve the performance of the map compared to GLM, and therefore we prefer using the simpler GLM method that can be more easily interpreted. The map allows identification of vulnerable forest areas in high spatial resolution (16 m × 16 m), making it useful in assessing the vulnerability of individual forest stands when making management decisions. The map is also a powerful tool for communicating disturbance risks to forest owners and managers and it has the potential to steer forest management practices to a more disturbance-aware direction. Our study showed that in spite of the inherent stochasticity of the wind and damage phenomena at all spati