Loading…

Managing nonperennial headwater streams in temperate forests of the United States

•Non-perennial streams drain the majority of land surface area in forested watersheds.•Yet non-perennial streams are not consistently considered in management guidelines.•Land use can modify these streams, but the extent of impacts is not well known.•Changes in flow regime affect temperature, sedime...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Forest ecology and management 2021-10, Vol.497, p.119523, Article 119523
Main Authors: Kampf, Stephanie K., Dwire, Kathleen A., Fairchild, Mathew P., Dunham, Jason, Snyder, Craig D., Jaeger, Kristin L., Luce, Charles H., Hammond, John C., Wilson, Codie, Zimmer, Margaret A., Sidell, Marielle
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Non-perennial streams drain the majority of land surface area in forested watersheds.•Yet non-perennial streams are not consistently considered in management guidelines.•Land use can modify these streams, but the extent of impacts is not well known.•Changes in flow regime affect temperature, sediment and organic matter dynamics.•Major knowledge gaps remain in hydrography, streamflow regime, and impacts on biota. Forest management guidelines are designed to protect water quality from unintended effects of land use changes such as timber harvest, mining, or forest road construction. Although streams that periodically cease to flow (nonperennial) drain the majority of forested areas, these streams are not consistently included in forest management guidelines. This paper reviews management guidelines for nonperennial (intermittent and ephemeral) streams draining temperate forests in the continental U.S., evaluates potential impacts of land use activities on ecosystem services provided by these streams, and identifies information needed to incorporate nonperennial streams into water quality protection practices. For federally administered lands, national management guidance is deliberately nonprescriptive, deferring to regional and forest-level recommendations for both perennial and nonperennial streams. Most state guidelines recommend riparian management zone (RMZ) protection for perennial streams (48/50 states) and intermittent streams (45/50 states), but only Alaska and West Virginia require RMZs around ephemeral streams. Based on the National Hydrography Dataset, an average of 58% of forested land area in the U.S. drains to nonperennial headwater streams, making these stream types the most common connectors between forested lands and the aquatic system. Land uses that modify flow regimes in these streams can affect sediment and organic matter transport and distribution, stream temperature dynamics, and biogeochemical processing. Nonperennial streams also provide material subsidies to downstream waters and serve as temporary habitats for some aquatic species. However, limited research has examined how forest land uses affect ecosystem services and biota in these streams. Therefore we highlight a set of key questions about nonperennial streams in forests, not the least of which is simply understanding where headwater stream channels are located and associated patterns of flow duration. Although many questions remain, we also note where recent advances in dat
ISSN:0378-1127
1872-7042
DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119523