Growth response of oaks to insect defoliation: Immediate and intermediate perspectives

• Published in: Forest ecology and management 2023-12, Vol.549, p.121465, Article 121465
• Main Authors: Hilmers, Torben, Leroy, Benjamin M.L., Bae, Soyeon, Hahn, W. Andreas, Hochrein, Sophia, Jacobs, Martin, Lemme, Hannes, Müller, Jörg, Schmied, Gerhard, Weisser, Wolfgang W., Pretzsch, Hans
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Defoliation; Lymantria dispar; Multiple stressors; Oak; Secondary growth
• ISSN: 0378-1127
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121465

•Secondary growth of 880 oaks monitored over three years after a spongy moth outbreak.•Moth defoliation reduces oak secondary growth by 10–60% in outbreak year.•Water availability mitigates defoliation's impact on oak secondary growth.•Mild defoliation sees oak secondary growth recovery in the post-outbreak year.•No further growth reduction observed two years post-defoliation. In this study, we investigate the immediate and short-term consequences of defoliation by the spongy moth Lymantria dispar on secondary growth of oaks (Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.), including the interplay between defoliation and water availability during the defoliation period within a large-scale field experiment in south-eastern Germany. Furthermore, the impact of defoliation on oak secondary growth is explored retrospectively based on tree core measurements. Within the large-scale filed experiment, secondary growth of 880 oaks in 44 oak-dominated stands was monitored using permanent girth tapes over a three-year period following a spongy moth outbreak. Insecticide treatments were applied to half of the plots to obtain trees without defoliation, and canopy cover dynamics were subsequently monitored ground based and from satellites in all plots. We found that moth defoliation significantly reduced oak secondary growth by 10–60% during the outbreak year, with the impact on secondary growth being directly proportional to defoliation intensity. The negative impact of defoliation on secondary growth was aggravated by increased water availability during the outbreak year. In the post-outbreak year, secondary growth of oaks that had endured mild defoliation was no longer different from that of non-defoliated oaks. In contrast, oaks that had experienced substantial defoliation still exhibited a significant 10–30% reduction in secondary growth. Regardless of defoliation intensity, no further reduction in secondary growth was detected two years after the event compared to control trees. Our complementary retrospective analysis, utilizing core samples from oaks previously subjected to a defoliation event under distinct weather conditions, disclosed a strikingly analogous recovery of secondary growth from defoliation instigated by the spongy moth. Thus, validating that our experimental findings possess broad temporal transferability.