Loading…

Natural disasters and well-being in India: A household-level panel data analysis

We provide first estimates of the impact of cumulative natural disasters on well-being in India disaggregated by social and economic groups. We use a nationally representative panel data set in a difference in difference model with fixed effects at the household level and a continuous treatment. We...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of disaster risk reduction 2022-09, Vol.79, p.103158, Article 103158
Main Authors: Tamuly, Rupali, Mukhopadhyay, Pranab
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-bc3a3fa6f1dabc34a7cdf55280ef6a10750b6fc708a93e25f0cf2418047da99e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-bc3a3fa6f1dabc34a7cdf55280ef6a10750b6fc708a93e25f0cf2418047da99e3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 103158
container_title International journal of disaster risk reduction
container_volume 79
creator Tamuly, Rupali
Mukhopadhyay, Pranab
description We provide first estimates of the impact of cumulative natural disasters on well-being in India disaggregated by social and economic groups. We use a nationally representative panel data set in a difference in difference model with fixed effects at the household level and a continuous treatment. We use monthly consumption expenditure adjusted for health expenditure as an indicator of well-being. We find that natural disasters have a consistent and significant negative impact on consumption across all social and economic groups. We also find that assets, health insurance, membership in groups, and the number of married females in the household are positive and significant. On the other hand, conflict intensity, number of persons in the household, the proportion of children in the household and public project intensity have a negative and significant coefficient. In the disaggregated results some variables provide consistent results across all caste groups and economic quintiles among the covariates. Among them are Assets owned by households, membership intensity and health insurance which positively impact on consumption. At the same time, the number of persons in the household and the proportion of children in the household have a negative and significant impact. Social capital too influences consumption. We find that conflict intensity has a significant and negative impact on consumption for some caste and economic groups, but not all. Some variables provided mixed results like public project intensity, number of married females, among others.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103158
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijdrr_2022_103158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2212420922003776</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2212420922003776</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-bc3a3fa6f1dabc34a7cdf55280ef6a10750b6fc708a93e25f0cf2418047da99e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGp_gZf8ga352E_BQyl-FIp60HOYTSY2S9wtybbSf29qPXhyDjMvA88wPIRcczbnjJc33dx1JoS5YEKkjeRFfUYmQnCR5YI153_yJZnF2LFUdVmKup6Q12cYdwE8NS5CHDFECr2hX-h91qLrP6jr6ao3Dm7pgm6GXcTN4E3mcY-ebqFP3cAIiQJ_iC5ekQsLPuLsd07J-8P92_IpW788rpaLdaYlk2PWagnSQmm5gZRzqLSxRSFqhrYEzqqCtaXVFauhkSgKy7QVOa9ZXhloGpRTIk93dRhiDGjVNrhPCAfFmTp6UZ368aKOXtTJS6LuThSm1_YOg4raYa_RuIB6VGZw__LfRQVtEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Natural disasters and well-being in India: A household-level panel data analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Tamuly, Rupali ; Mukhopadhyay, Pranab</creator><creatorcontrib>Tamuly, Rupali ; Mukhopadhyay, Pranab</creatorcontrib><description>We provide first estimates of the impact of cumulative natural disasters on well-being in India disaggregated by social and economic groups. We use a nationally representative panel data set in a difference in difference model with fixed effects at the household level and a continuous treatment. We use monthly consumption expenditure adjusted for health expenditure as an indicator of well-being. We find that natural disasters have a consistent and significant negative impact on consumption across all social and economic groups. We also find that assets, health insurance, membership in groups, and the number of married females in the household are positive and significant. On the other hand, conflict intensity, number of persons in the household, the proportion of children in the household and public project intensity have a negative and significant coefficient. In the disaggregated results some variables provide consistent results across all caste groups and economic quintiles among the covariates. Among them are Assets owned by households, membership intensity and health insurance which positively impact on consumption. At the same time, the number of persons in the household and the proportion of children in the household have a negative and significant impact. Social capital too influences consumption. We find that conflict intensity has a significant and negative impact on consumption for some caste and economic groups, but not all. Some variables provided mixed results like public project intensity, number of married females, among others.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2212-4209</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2212-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103158</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adjusted consumption ; Assets ; Insurance ; Natural disasters ; Socio-economic groups</subject><ispartof>International journal of disaster risk reduction, 2022-09, Vol.79, p.103158, Article 103158</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-bc3a3fa6f1dabc34a7cdf55280ef6a10750b6fc708a93e25f0cf2418047da99e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-bc3a3fa6f1dabc34a7cdf55280ef6a10750b6fc708a93e25f0cf2418047da99e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9999-4938</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tamuly, Rupali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mukhopadhyay, Pranab</creatorcontrib><title>Natural disasters and well-being in India: A household-level panel data analysis</title><title>International journal of disaster risk reduction</title><description>We provide first estimates of the impact of cumulative natural disasters on well-being in India disaggregated by social and economic groups. We use a nationally representative panel data set in a difference in difference model with fixed effects at the household level and a continuous treatment. We use monthly consumption expenditure adjusted for health expenditure as an indicator of well-being. We find that natural disasters have a consistent and significant negative impact on consumption across all social and economic groups. We also find that assets, health insurance, membership in groups, and the number of married females in the household are positive and significant. On the other hand, conflict intensity, number of persons in the household, the proportion of children in the household and public project intensity have a negative and significant coefficient. In the disaggregated results some variables provide consistent results across all caste groups and economic quintiles among the covariates. Among them are Assets owned by households, membership intensity and health insurance which positively impact on consumption. At the same time, the number of persons in the household and the proportion of children in the household have a negative and significant impact. Social capital too influences consumption. We find that conflict intensity has a significant and negative impact on consumption for some caste and economic groups, but not all. Some variables provided mixed results like public project intensity, number of married females, among others.</description><subject>Adjusted consumption</subject><subject>Assets</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Natural disasters</subject><subject>Socio-economic groups</subject><issn>2212-4209</issn><issn>2212-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWGp_gZf8ga352E_BQyl-FIp60HOYTSY2S9wtybbSf29qPXhyDjMvA88wPIRcczbnjJc33dx1JoS5YEKkjeRFfUYmQnCR5YI153_yJZnF2LFUdVmKup6Q12cYdwE8NS5CHDFECr2hX-h91qLrP6jr6ao3Dm7pgm6GXcTN4E3mcY-ebqFP3cAIiQJ_iC5ekQsLPuLsd07J-8P92_IpW788rpaLdaYlk2PWagnSQmm5gZRzqLSxRSFqhrYEzqqCtaXVFauhkSgKy7QVOa9ZXhloGpRTIk93dRhiDGjVNrhPCAfFmTp6UZ368aKOXtTJS6LuThSm1_YOg4raYa_RuIB6VGZw__LfRQVtEA</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Tamuly, Rupali</creator><creator>Mukhopadhyay, Pranab</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9999-4938</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Natural disasters and well-being in India: A household-level panel data analysis</title><author>Tamuly, Rupali ; Mukhopadhyay, Pranab</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-bc3a3fa6f1dabc34a7cdf55280ef6a10750b6fc708a93e25f0cf2418047da99e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adjusted consumption</topic><topic>Assets</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Natural disasters</topic><topic>Socio-economic groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tamuly, Rupali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mukhopadhyay, Pranab</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of disaster risk reduction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tamuly, Rupali</au><au>Mukhopadhyay, Pranab</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Natural disasters and well-being in India: A household-level panel data analysis</atitle><jtitle>International journal of disaster risk reduction</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>79</volume><spage>103158</spage><pages>103158-</pages><artnum>103158</artnum><issn>2212-4209</issn><eissn>2212-4209</eissn><abstract>We provide first estimates of the impact of cumulative natural disasters on well-being in India disaggregated by social and economic groups. We use a nationally representative panel data set in a difference in difference model with fixed effects at the household level and a continuous treatment. We use monthly consumption expenditure adjusted for health expenditure as an indicator of well-being. We find that natural disasters have a consistent and significant negative impact on consumption across all social and economic groups. We also find that assets, health insurance, membership in groups, and the number of married females in the household are positive and significant. On the other hand, conflict intensity, number of persons in the household, the proportion of children in the household and public project intensity have a negative and significant coefficient. In the disaggregated results some variables provide consistent results across all caste groups and economic quintiles among the covariates. Among them are Assets owned by households, membership intensity and health insurance which positively impact on consumption. At the same time, the number of persons in the household and the proportion of children in the household have a negative and significant impact. Social capital too influences consumption. We find that conflict intensity has a significant and negative impact on consumption for some caste and economic groups, but not all. Some variables provided mixed results like public project intensity, number of married females, among others.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103158</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9999-4938</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2212-4209
ispartof International journal of disaster risk reduction, 2022-09, Vol.79, p.103158, Article 103158
issn 2212-4209
2212-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijdrr_2022_103158
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Adjusted consumption
Assets
Insurance
Natural disasters
Socio-economic groups
title Natural disasters and well-being in India: A household-level panel data analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T21%3A06%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Natural%20disasters%20and%20well-being%20in%20India:%20A%20household-level%20panel%20data%20analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20disaster%20risk%20reduction&rft.au=Tamuly,%20Rupali&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=79&rft.spage=103158&rft.pages=103158-&rft.artnum=103158&rft.issn=2212-4209&rft.eissn=2212-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103158&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES2212420922003776%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-bc3a3fa6f1dabc34a7cdf55280ef6a10750b6fc708a93e25f0cf2418047da99e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true