Loading…

Distributions of enterococci and human-specific bacteriophages of enterococci in a tropical watershed

The bacteriophages of E. faecalis strains AIM06 (DSM100702) and SR14 (DSM100701) have previously been validated as human-specific microbial source tracking (MST) markers in Thailand. In this study, their spatial and temporal distribution in a freshwater river was investigated for the first time (n =...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of hygiene and environmental health 2020-05, Vol.226, p.113482, Article 113482
Main Authors: Chyerochana, Natcha, Kongprajug, Akechai, Somnark, Pornjira, Leelapanang Kamphaengthong, Pinida, Mongkolsuk, Skorn, Sirikanchana, Kwanrawee
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4f4f25864347ffc13cbf7ed4285101ec930128518b0fe9c2e69fa78b2a09abcb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4f4f25864347ffc13cbf7ed4285101ec930128518b0fe9c2e69fa78b2a09abcb3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 113482
container_title International journal of hygiene and environmental health
container_volume 226
creator Chyerochana, Natcha
Kongprajug, Akechai
Somnark, Pornjira
Leelapanang Kamphaengthong, Pinida
Mongkolsuk, Skorn
Sirikanchana, Kwanrawee
description The bacteriophages of E. faecalis strains AIM06 (DSM100702) and SR14 (DSM100701) have previously been validated as human-specific microbial source tracking (MST) markers in Thailand. In this study, their spatial and temporal distribution in a freshwater river was investigated for the first time (n = 48). The abundance of enterococci as a standard microbial water quality parameter was evaluated by both the qPCR detection assay with primers and a hydrolysis probe according to the US EPA Method 1611 and the US EPA Method 1600 membrane filtration culture method. AIM06 and SR14 phages were detected by a double layer agar assay and were present in 87.5% and 81.3% of all samples with a co-presence of 92.9% of phage-positive samples. After spiking the representative phages, the ranges of recovery efficiencies were 57.9–99.6% and 49.6–99.9% (n = 48) for AIM06 and SR14 phages, respectively. The absolute abundance of AIM06 and SR14 phages ranged from 0.25 to 221.94 and from 0.25 to 76.66 PFU/100 mL, respectively. Enterococci DNA copies and CFU were detected in all samples ranging from 3.24 to 6.32 log10 copies/100 mL and 100.00 to 1593 CFU/100 mL, respectively. Enterococci in the qPCR assay also showed a moderate correlation with the culture method. The AIM06 and SR14 phage results indicated continuing human faecal pollution along the river with no significant different levels among stations. Interestingly, the higher levels of enterococci in downstream stations for both the qPCR and culture methods along with the significant correlation with other faecal indicator organisms and non-human MST markers implied non-human faecal pollution. In conclusion, this study provides insightful information that could lead to effective water quality management and public health risk reduction from exposure to faecally-contaminated water. [Display omitted] •AIM06 and SR14 phages indicated continuing human faecal pollution along the river.•High enterococci levels in downstream stations implied non-human faecal pollution.•Enterococci qPCR showed a moderate correlation with the CFU culture method.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113482
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijheh_2020_113482</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S143846391931020X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S143846391931020X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4f4f25864347ffc13cbf7ed4285101ec930128518b0fe9c2e69fa78b2a09abcb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNtKxDAQhoMorq4-gSB9ga45tU0vvJD1CAveKHgX0unEpuw2Jekqvr1dq94IXs0w8_9z-Ag5Y3TBKMsv2oVrG2wWnPKxwoRUfI8csZyplAn2sj_mUqhU5qKckeMYW0o5o6o8JDPBqSoyKo8IXrs4BFdtB-e7mHibYDdg8OABXGK6Omm2G9OlsUdw1kFSGRj7zveNecU_BtclJhmC7x2YdfJuxk5ssD4hB9asI55-xzl5vr15Wt6nq8e7h-XVKgWRlUMqrbQ8U7kUsrAWmIDKFlhLrrLxY4RSULbLVUUtlsAxL60pVMUNLU0FlZgTMc2F4GMMaHUf3MaED82o3kHTrf6CpnfQ9ARtdJ1Prn5bbbD-9fxQGgWXkwDH298cBh3BYQdYu4Aw6Nq7fxd8Ar8UgJ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distributions of enterococci and human-specific bacteriophages of enterococci in a tropical watershed</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Chyerochana, Natcha ; Kongprajug, Akechai ; Somnark, Pornjira ; Leelapanang Kamphaengthong, Pinida ; Mongkolsuk, Skorn ; Sirikanchana, Kwanrawee</creator><creatorcontrib>Chyerochana, Natcha ; Kongprajug, Akechai ; Somnark, Pornjira ; Leelapanang Kamphaengthong, Pinida ; Mongkolsuk, Skorn ; Sirikanchana, Kwanrawee</creatorcontrib><description>The bacteriophages of E. faecalis strains AIM06 (DSM100702) and SR14 (DSM100701) have previously been validated as human-specific microbial source tracking (MST) markers in Thailand. In this study, their spatial and temporal distribution in a freshwater river was investigated for the first time (n = 48). The abundance of enterococci as a standard microbial water quality parameter was evaluated by both the qPCR detection assay with primers and a hydrolysis probe according to the US EPA Method 1611 and the US EPA Method 1600 membrane filtration culture method. AIM06 and SR14 phages were detected by a double layer agar assay and were present in 87.5% and 81.3% of all samples with a co-presence of 92.9% of phage-positive samples. After spiking the representative phages, the ranges of recovery efficiencies were 57.9–99.6% and 49.6–99.9% (n = 48) for AIM06 and SR14 phages, respectively. The absolute abundance of AIM06 and SR14 phages ranged from 0.25 to 221.94 and from 0.25 to 76.66 PFU/100 mL, respectively. Enterococci DNA copies and CFU were detected in all samples ranging from 3.24 to 6.32 log10 copies/100 mL and 100.00 to 1593 CFU/100 mL, respectively. Enterococci in the qPCR assay also showed a moderate correlation with the culture method. The AIM06 and SR14 phage results indicated continuing human faecal pollution along the river with no significant different levels among stations. Interestingly, the higher levels of enterococci in downstream stations for both the qPCR and culture methods along with the significant correlation with other faecal indicator organisms and non-human MST markers implied non-human faecal pollution. In conclusion, this study provides insightful information that could lead to effective water quality management and public health risk reduction from exposure to faecally-contaminated water. [Display omitted] •AIM06 and SR14 phages indicated continuing human faecal pollution along the river.•High enterococci levels in downstream stations implied non-human faecal pollution.•Enterococci qPCR showed a moderate correlation with the CFU culture method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1438-4639</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-131X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113482</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32087504</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Elsevier GmbH</publisher><subject>Bacteriophages ; Bacteriophages - isolation &amp; purification ; DNA, Bacterial - analysis ; Enterococci ; Enterococcus - genetics ; Enterococcus - isolation &amp; purification ; Enterococcus - virology ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Faecal indicators ; Feces ; Humans ; Microbial source tracking ; Rivers - microbiology ; Thailand ; Tropical Climate ; Water Microbiology ; Water Pollutants - isolation &amp; purification ; Water Quality ; Water quality monitoring ; Water Supply</subject><ispartof>International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2020-05, Vol.226, p.113482, Article 113482</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier GmbH</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4f4f25864347ffc13cbf7ed4285101ec930128518b0fe9c2e69fa78b2a09abcb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4f4f25864347ffc13cbf7ed4285101ec930128518b0fe9c2e69fa78b2a09abcb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7273-4060</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32087504$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chyerochana, Natcha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kongprajug, Akechai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somnark, Pornjira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leelapanang Kamphaengthong, Pinida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongkolsuk, Skorn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirikanchana, Kwanrawee</creatorcontrib><title>Distributions of enterococci and human-specific bacteriophages of enterococci in a tropical watershed</title><title>International journal of hygiene and environmental health</title><addtitle>Int J Hyg Environ Health</addtitle><description>The bacteriophages of E. faecalis strains AIM06 (DSM100702) and SR14 (DSM100701) have previously been validated as human-specific microbial source tracking (MST) markers in Thailand. In this study, their spatial and temporal distribution in a freshwater river was investigated for the first time (n = 48). The abundance of enterococci as a standard microbial water quality parameter was evaluated by both the qPCR detection assay with primers and a hydrolysis probe according to the US EPA Method 1611 and the US EPA Method 1600 membrane filtration culture method. AIM06 and SR14 phages were detected by a double layer agar assay and were present in 87.5% and 81.3% of all samples with a co-presence of 92.9% of phage-positive samples. After spiking the representative phages, the ranges of recovery efficiencies were 57.9–99.6% and 49.6–99.9% (n = 48) for AIM06 and SR14 phages, respectively. The absolute abundance of AIM06 and SR14 phages ranged from 0.25 to 221.94 and from 0.25 to 76.66 PFU/100 mL, respectively. Enterococci DNA copies and CFU were detected in all samples ranging from 3.24 to 6.32 log10 copies/100 mL and 100.00 to 1593 CFU/100 mL, respectively. Enterococci in the qPCR assay also showed a moderate correlation with the culture method. The AIM06 and SR14 phage results indicated continuing human faecal pollution along the river with no significant different levels among stations. Interestingly, the higher levels of enterococci in downstream stations for both the qPCR and culture methods along with the significant correlation with other faecal indicator organisms and non-human MST markers implied non-human faecal pollution. In conclusion, this study provides insightful information that could lead to effective water quality management and public health risk reduction from exposure to faecally-contaminated water. [Display omitted] •AIM06 and SR14 phages indicated continuing human faecal pollution along the river.•High enterococci levels in downstream stations implied non-human faecal pollution.•Enterococci qPCR showed a moderate correlation with the CFU culture method.</description><subject>Bacteriophages</subject><subject>Bacteriophages - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - analysis</subject><subject>Enterococci</subject><subject>Enterococcus - genetics</subject><subject>Enterococcus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Enterococcus - virology</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Faecal indicators</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Microbial source tracking</subject><subject>Rivers - microbiology</subject><subject>Thailand</subject><subject>Tropical Climate</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><subject>Water Pollutants - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Water Quality</subject><subject>Water quality monitoring</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><issn>1438-4639</issn><issn>1618-131X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kNtKxDAQhoMorq4-gSB9ga45tU0vvJD1CAveKHgX0unEpuw2Jekqvr1dq94IXs0w8_9z-Ag5Y3TBKMsv2oVrG2wWnPKxwoRUfI8csZyplAn2sj_mUqhU5qKckeMYW0o5o6o8JDPBqSoyKo8IXrs4BFdtB-e7mHibYDdg8OABXGK6Omm2G9OlsUdw1kFSGRj7zveNecU_BtclJhmC7x2YdfJuxk5ssD4hB9asI55-xzl5vr15Wt6nq8e7h-XVKgWRlUMqrbQ8U7kUsrAWmIDKFlhLrrLxY4RSULbLVUUtlsAxL60pVMUNLU0FlZgTMc2F4GMMaHUf3MaED82o3kHTrf6CpnfQ9ARtdJ1Prn5bbbD-9fxQGgWXkwDH298cBh3BYQdYu4Aw6Nq7fxd8Ar8UgJ8</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Chyerochana, Natcha</creator><creator>Kongprajug, Akechai</creator><creator>Somnark, Pornjira</creator><creator>Leelapanang Kamphaengthong, Pinida</creator><creator>Mongkolsuk, Skorn</creator><creator>Sirikanchana, Kwanrawee</creator><general>Elsevier GmbH</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7273-4060</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Distributions of enterococci and human-specific bacteriophages of enterococci in a tropical watershed</title><author>Chyerochana, Natcha ; Kongprajug, Akechai ; Somnark, Pornjira ; Leelapanang Kamphaengthong, Pinida ; Mongkolsuk, Skorn ; Sirikanchana, Kwanrawee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4f4f25864347ffc13cbf7ed4285101ec930128518b0fe9c2e69fa78b2a09abcb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bacteriophages</topic><topic>Bacteriophages - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - analysis</topic><topic>Enterococci</topic><topic>Enterococcus - genetics</topic><topic>Enterococcus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Enterococcus - virology</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Faecal indicators</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Microbial source tracking</topic><topic>Rivers - microbiology</topic><topic>Thailand</topic><topic>Tropical Climate</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><topic>Water Pollutants - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Water Quality</topic><topic>Water quality monitoring</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chyerochana, Natcha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kongprajug, Akechai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somnark, Pornjira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leelapanang Kamphaengthong, Pinida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mongkolsuk, Skorn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sirikanchana, Kwanrawee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of hygiene and environmental health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chyerochana, Natcha</au><au>Kongprajug, Akechai</au><au>Somnark, Pornjira</au><au>Leelapanang Kamphaengthong, Pinida</au><au>Mongkolsuk, Skorn</au><au>Sirikanchana, Kwanrawee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distributions of enterococci and human-specific bacteriophages of enterococci in a tropical watershed</atitle><jtitle>International journal of hygiene and environmental health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Hyg Environ Health</addtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>226</volume><spage>113482</spage><pages>113482-</pages><artnum>113482</artnum><issn>1438-4639</issn><eissn>1618-131X</eissn><abstract>The bacteriophages of E. faecalis strains AIM06 (DSM100702) and SR14 (DSM100701) have previously been validated as human-specific microbial source tracking (MST) markers in Thailand. In this study, their spatial and temporal distribution in a freshwater river was investigated for the first time (n = 48). The abundance of enterococci as a standard microbial water quality parameter was evaluated by both the qPCR detection assay with primers and a hydrolysis probe according to the US EPA Method 1611 and the US EPA Method 1600 membrane filtration culture method. AIM06 and SR14 phages were detected by a double layer agar assay and were present in 87.5% and 81.3% of all samples with a co-presence of 92.9% of phage-positive samples. After spiking the representative phages, the ranges of recovery efficiencies were 57.9–99.6% and 49.6–99.9% (n = 48) for AIM06 and SR14 phages, respectively. The absolute abundance of AIM06 and SR14 phages ranged from 0.25 to 221.94 and from 0.25 to 76.66 PFU/100 mL, respectively. Enterococci DNA copies and CFU were detected in all samples ranging from 3.24 to 6.32 log10 copies/100 mL and 100.00 to 1593 CFU/100 mL, respectively. Enterococci in the qPCR assay also showed a moderate correlation with the culture method. The AIM06 and SR14 phage results indicated continuing human faecal pollution along the river with no significant different levels among stations. Interestingly, the higher levels of enterococci in downstream stations for both the qPCR and culture methods along with the significant correlation with other faecal indicator organisms and non-human MST markers implied non-human faecal pollution. In conclusion, this study provides insightful information that could lead to effective water quality management and public health risk reduction from exposure to faecally-contaminated water. [Display omitted] •AIM06 and SR14 phages indicated continuing human faecal pollution along the river.•High enterococci levels in downstream stations implied non-human faecal pollution.•Enterococci qPCR showed a moderate correlation with the CFU culture method.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Elsevier GmbH</pub><pmid>32087504</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113482</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7273-4060</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1438-4639
ispartof International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2020-05, Vol.226, p.113482, Article 113482
issn 1438-4639
1618-131X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijheh_2020_113482
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Bacteriophages
Bacteriophages - isolation & purification
DNA, Bacterial - analysis
Enterococci
Enterococcus - genetics
Enterococcus - isolation & purification
Enterococcus - virology
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Faecal indicators
Feces
Humans
Microbial source tracking
Rivers - microbiology
Thailand
Tropical Climate
Water Microbiology
Water Pollutants - isolation & purification
Water Quality
Water quality monitoring
Water Supply
title Distributions of enterococci and human-specific bacteriophages of enterococci in a tropical watershed
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T22%3A59%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distributions%20of%20enterococci%20and%20human-specific%20bacteriophages%20of%20enterococci%20in%20a%20tropical%20watershed&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20hygiene%20and%20environmental%20health&rft.au=Chyerochana,%20Natcha&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=226&rft.spage=113482&rft.pages=113482-&rft.artnum=113482&rft.issn=1438-4639&rft.eissn=1618-131X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113482&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES143846391931020X%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4f4f25864347ffc13cbf7ed4285101ec930128518b0fe9c2e69fa78b2a09abcb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32087504&rfr_iscdi=true