Loading…

A novel process for CO2 capture from steam methane reformer with molten carbonate fuel cell

Hydrogen (H2) production via steam methane reforming is a mature and cost-effective technology. However, carbon capture and storage is required to decrease its carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The adoption of molten carbonate fuel cells as means to capture CO2 from flue gases is attracting scientific...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of hydrogen energy 2023-12, Vol.48 (95), p.37366-37384
Main Authors: d’Amore, Federico, Pereira, Luis M.C., Campanari, Stefano, Gazzani, Matteo, Romano, Matteo C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Hydrogen (H2) production via steam methane reforming is a mature and cost-effective technology. However, carbon capture and storage is required to decrease its carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The adoption of molten carbonate fuel cells as means to capture CO2 from flue gases is attracting scientific interest thanks to their inherent thermodynamic advantage of separating CO2 while producing electricity. This study investigates and benchmarks the performance of an H2 production plant equipped with molten carbonate fuel cell for post-combustion CO2 capture, by proposing a novel configuration where the cell anode is fed with the carbon-rich off-gas from the H2 separation unit. It emerges that the process can achieve higher capture rates than the reference solvent-based plant: 85–90% with single cell, 95% with two-stage cell. Moreover, recycling the carbon-rich off gas to the anode allows for smaller cell area, and potentially lower H2 production costs compared to the benchmark. •CO2 capture from steam methane reforming with molten carbonate fuel cell is studied.•A novel process based on off-gas anode feed and 2-stage cell is proposed.•Novel process achieves 90–95% CO2 capture, against 85% natural gas fed anode process.•Novel process has smaller cell area and H2 production cost than natural gas feed.•Novel process has comparable H2 production cost with conventional MEA CO2 capture.
ISSN:0360-3199
1879-3487
DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.137