Bubble formation in a planar water–air–water jet: Effects of the nozzle geometry and the injection conditions

• Published in: International journal of multiphase flow 2014-10, Vol.65, p.38-50
• Main Authors: Gutiérrez-Montes, C., Bolaños-Jiménez, R., Sevilla, A., Martínez-Bazán, C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bubble formation; Bubbling frequnecy; Exact sciences and technology; Fluid dynamics; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications); Multiphase and particle-laden flows; Nonhomogeneous flows; Physics; Planar co-flowing jets
• ISSN: 0301-9322; 1879-3533
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.05.012

•Description of the bubbling process in planar co-flows under realistic conditions.•Effects of the nozzle geometry on the destabilization of the air–water film.•Influence of the nozzle geometry on the bubble formation process.•Comparison of the bubbling process at different injection conditions. The present study describes the influence of the nozzle geometry and the injection conditions on the dynamics of a planar water–air–water jet discharging into stagnant air. An exhaustive numerical study, previously validated with experimental results, has been conducted to assess the effects of the air injector wall thickness, β=Hi/Ho, the water-to-air thickness ratio, h=Hw/Ho, the tip shape of the air injector, the water velocity profile at the exit slit, and the air feeding conditions, on both the destabilization of the air sheet and the formation of bubbles. As a result, it has been found that the air sheet becomes more unstable for thinner air injectors and water sheets. However, the bubbling frequency does not exhibit a monotonic behavior with β, increasing initially and barely changing for β>0.54. Moreover, the transition from jetting to bubbling has been described in terms linear stability theory, showing that the model is able to capture the effects of h and β. Our results also indicate that the water–air–water sheet becomes more unstable and the bubbling frequency increases when a rounded air injector lip is used. On the other hand, increasing the boundary layer of the water stream stabilizes the flow since the shear at the air–water interface is reduced, attenuating the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability, but increases the bubbling frequency due the decrease in the liquid momentum near the interface. Finally, we show that bigger bubbles are generated when the gas is fed at constant pressure rather than at constant flow rate, thus revealing the importance of the injection system in the bubbling process.