Transitioning from hospital to home after a major lower extremity amputation: Interview study on patients' and relatives’ perspectives

• Published in: International journal of orthopaedic and trauma nursing 2024-08, Vol.54, p.101103, Article 101103
• Main Authors: Abrahamsen, Charlotte, Dall-Hansen, Dorte, Igelski, Malene Tofteng, Schober, Thea-Louise, Jensen, Charlotte Myhre
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Lower limb amputation; Patient perspectives; Relative perspectives; Transition
• ISSN: 1878-1241
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2024.101103

Patients often feel unprepared and concerned about their new life after a major lower extremity amputation (LEA). Therefore, we implemented an integrated care program, Safe Journey, to optimize the quality and continuity of care for patients with LEA due to vascular disease when transitioning from hospital to home. This study aims to illuminate and explore the experiences of patients with LEA and their relatives with the transition from hospital to home after implementing Safe Journey. This qualitative, exploratory study individually interviewed six patients with a major LEA and four relatives and jointly interviewed eight patients with their relatives. The participants’ experiences transitioning from hospital to home were centered around two major themes: (1) Going home: mixed emotions and confusion, and (2) bridging the gap. The main themes encompassed six subthemes: (1) simultaneously expectant and worried, (2) a lack of knowledge creating uncertainty, (3) an unexpressed but pending need for psychosocial support, (4) reassurance but safety comes at a price, (5) navigating the system, and (6) lack of involvement. Transitioning from hospital to home after a major LEA creates mixed emotions. Knowledge, feeling involved, and being prepared and cared for were highlighted as important during the transition. The Safe Journey program made patients and relatives feel physically reassured and safe, but all the home visits strained the families. The program's benefits are consistent with existing knowledge on patients with complex needs benefitting from integrated care models. However, a more individualized and person-centered approach is needed.