3D reconstruction: Why should the accuracy always be presented in the pixel unit?

This paper analyses the error presentation of parallax-based techniques (mainly stereoscopy and structured light). They are usually presented using an absolute (mm) or a relative (%) scale. These results are hard to compare between different systems as they are system-dependent. This paper presents...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Image and vision computing 2016-04, Vol.48-49, p.57-60
Main Authors: Mertens, Benjamin, Delchambre, Alain
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Error
Parallax
Pixel
Stereoscopy
Structured light
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper analyses the error presentation of parallax-based techniques (mainly stereoscopy and structured light). They are usually presented using an absolute (mm) or a relative (%) scale. These results are hard to compare between different systems as they are system-dependent. This paper presents results using the pixel unit which avoids the influence of geometric parameters. Moreover it is apt at evaluating whether the system under-performs or is similar compared to theoretical accuracy.
ISSN:0262-8856
1872-8138
DOI:10.1016/j.imavis.2016.02.002