Loading…

Comparative study of phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of leaf extracts from three wild Rosa species grown in different Tunisia regions: Rosa canina L., Rosa moschata Herrm. and Rosa sempervirens L

•Fifteen phenolic compounds are identified in methanol and ethyl acetate extracts obtained from leaves of Rosa canina, Rosa sempervirens and Rosa moschata collected from different Tunisian regions.•Presence of a new metabolite: aromadendrin hexoside-deoxyhexoside mainly detected in EtOAc extracts fr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Industrial crops and products 2016-12, Vol.94, p.167-177
Main Authors: Ouerghemmi, Saloua, Sebei, Houcine, Siracusa, Laura, Ruberto, Giuseppe, Saija, Antonina, Cimino, Francesco, Cristani, Mariateresa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Fifteen phenolic compounds are identified in methanol and ethyl acetate extracts obtained from leaves of Rosa canina, Rosa sempervirens and Rosa moschata collected from different Tunisian regions.•Presence of a new metabolite: aromadendrin hexoside-deoxyhexoside mainly detected in EtOAc extracts from R. moschata and R. sempervirens and strongly affected by the area parameter.•R. canina extracts are rich on kaempferol derivatives and R. moschata and R. sempervirens extracts are rich on quercetin derivatives.•It was shown that the antioxidant power of Rosa leaf extracts is influenced by species, organic extract and area factors.•R. sempervirens and R. moschata leaf extracts could be used as a good alternative to R. canina. Aim of the present study was to characterize and to compare phenolic composition and antioxidant properties of methanol (MeOH) and ethyl acetate (EtOAc) extracts from leaves of Rosa canina, Rosa sempervirens and Rosa moschata collected from different Tunisian regions. Fifteen phenolic compounds were identified by means of HPLC-DAD and HPLC-DAD-ESI–MS analyses. It was shown that phenolic composition of Rosa canina extracts includes two kaempferol derivatives (Kaempferol 3-O-glucoside and kaempferol 7-O-glucoside) which are not present in profiles of the two Synstylae species. Rosa moschata and Rosa sempervirens extracts are rich in quercetin derivatives. As regarding the total phenolic content (evaluated by the Folin–Ciocalteu assay), R. sempervirens and R. moschata showed the highest values with their EtOAc and MeOH extracts, respectively. The highest mean values for DPPH, TEAC and FRAP tests were recorded for the EtOAc extracts of R. sempervirens and for the MeOH extracts of R. canina. In the ORAC assay, R. moschata and R. sempervirens showed the highest effectiveness for EtOAc and MeOH extracts, respectively. Taken together, these data suggest that leaf extracts of different Tunisian Rosa species should be used as a potential source of antioxidant phenolics, and R. sempervirens and R. moschata are a good alternative to R. canina especially in those regions where these species can be easily found.
ISSN:0926-6690
1872-633X
DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.08.019