Loading…
The optimal upper bound of the number of queries for Laplace mechanism under differential privacy
Differential privacy is a state-of-the-art technology for privacy preserving, and Laplace mechanism is a simple and powerful tool to realize differential privacy. However, there is an obvious flaw in differential privacy, which is each query function can only be executed finite times for the reason...
Saved in:
Published in: | Information sciences 2019-11, Vol.503, p.219-237 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Differential privacy is a state-of-the-art technology for privacy preserving, and Laplace mechanism is a simple and powerful tool to realize differential privacy. However, there is an obvious flaw in differential privacy, which is each query function can only be executed finite times for the reason that adversary can recover the real query result if he executes the same query function many times. Unfortunately, how to set the upper bound for the number of linear queries is still an issue. In this paper, we focus on the linear query function in Laplace-based mechanisms, and we propose a method to set the upper bound for the number of linear queries from the perspective of information theory. The main idea is, firstly we find the most aggressive linear query that leaks the maximum information about the dataset to adversaries, and we set the upper bound of the number of queries so that even if the most aggressive linear query cannot leak the whole self-information about any individual to the adversary. On the other hand, the number of queries is also influenced by the type of dataset (continuous and discrete). In this paper, we also discuss the different upper bound for the number of queries for continuous datasets and discrete datasets. Finally, we conduct the experiments on the continuous dataset and the discrete dataset to prove our result. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-0255 1872-6291 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.001 |