Loading…

Stress-strain modelling of circular concrete-filled FRP–steel composite tube columns under axial compression load

Concrete filled-circular steel tube (CFCST) columns, when externally confined with carbon or glass fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) sheets and subjected to axial load, exhibit improved strength and ductility compared to unconfined cases. The mechanical properties of the confinement materials are cruc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Structures (Oxford) 2024-09, Vol.67, p.107040, Article 107040
Main Authors: Hamed, Asmaa Y., Hassanein, M.F., Hasan, Mohamed Abdel-Shakour
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-4c7e8099ac2d92eaf573f237b486cd521fc7845e487fba2e8bf3d47fa8b3d2c83
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 107040
container_title Structures (Oxford)
container_volume 67
creator Hamed, Asmaa Y.
Hassanein, M.F.
Hasan, Mohamed Abdel-Shakour
description Concrete filled-circular steel tube (CFCST) columns, when externally confined with carbon or glass fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) sheets and subjected to axial load, exhibit improved strength and ductility compared to unconfined cases. The mechanical properties of the confinement materials are crucial in determining the stress-strain relationship of the confined concrete. This study presents an in-depth analysis of the stress-strain behavior of FRP-confined CFST columns, based on data from 252 specimens. It examines a range of factors, including various infill concrete grades from 14.15 to 140.39 MPa, two types of carbon steel outer tubes with yield strengths (fy) from 226 to 466.5 MPa, and two types of FRP (CFRP and GFRP) with tensile strengths from 1260 to 4900 MPa. The complete axial stress-strain curve is divided into four phases according to a mathematical expression by Wu and Wei (2015): the elastic phase, nonlinear transition phase, linear softening phase, and residual phase. New formulas for ultimate stress, based on confinement stress, were proposed by Hassanin et al. (2023), while the ultimate strain was calculated using the classical formula by Richart et al. Peak stress and strain were determined through statistical linear regression analysis using SPSS software, based on 252 experimental data points and involved using a combined factor of steel contribution (Elsfco) and FRP contribution (Elffco). Eight specimens were specifically used to validate the models through Finite Element Method (FEM) simulations. The accuracy of the predicted analysis results was also assessed by comparing them to existing models. The evaluation showed that the models successfully simulated the complete stress-strain curve of FRP-wrapped CFST columns under axial load, producing satisfactory results. These four models provide reliable results for calculating ultimate stress, ultimate strain, peak stress, peak strain, and the complete stress-strain behavior of these columns.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107040
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_istruc_2024_107040</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2352012424011925</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2352012424011925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-4c7e8099ac2d92eaf573f237b486cd521fc7845e487fba2e8bf3d47fa8b3d2c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWGrfwEVeYGqSyTTpRpBiVSgoXtYhk5xISjopSUZ05zv4hj6JU8aFK1fn9p__HD6EzimZU0IXF9u5zyX1Zs4I40NLEE6O0ITVDasIZfz4T36KZjlvCSGM8kEtJig_lQQ5V4OF9h3eRQsh-O4VR4eNT6YPOmETO5OgQOV8CGDx-vHh-_MrF4AwzHb7mH0BXPoWhjL0uy7jvrOQsH73epQcjvjY4RC1PUMnTocMs984RS_r6-fVbbW5v7lbXW0qQ2VTKm4ESLJcasPskoF2jagdq0XL5cLYhlFnhOQNcClcqxnI1tWWC6dlW1tmZD1FfPQ1KeacwKl98judPhQl6sBObdXITh3YqZHdsHY5rsHw25uHpLLx0BmwPoEpykb_v8EPoMt9zw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stress-strain modelling of circular concrete-filled FRP–steel composite tube columns under axial compression load</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Hamed, Asmaa Y. ; Hassanein, M.F. ; Hasan, Mohamed Abdel-Shakour</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamed, Asmaa Y. ; Hassanein, M.F. ; Hasan, Mohamed Abdel-Shakour</creatorcontrib><description>Concrete filled-circular steel tube (CFCST) columns, when externally confined with carbon or glass fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) sheets and subjected to axial load, exhibit improved strength and ductility compared to unconfined cases. The mechanical properties of the confinement materials are crucial in determining the stress-strain relationship of the confined concrete. This study presents an in-depth analysis of the stress-strain behavior of FRP-confined CFST columns, based on data from 252 specimens. It examines a range of factors, including various infill concrete grades from 14.15 to 140.39 MPa, two types of carbon steel outer tubes with yield strengths (fy) from 226 to 466.5 MPa, and two types of FRP (CFRP and GFRP) with tensile strengths from 1260 to 4900 MPa. The complete axial stress-strain curve is divided into four phases according to a mathematical expression by Wu and Wei (2015): the elastic phase, nonlinear transition phase, linear softening phase, and residual phase. New formulas for ultimate stress, based on confinement stress, were proposed by Hassanin et al. (2023), while the ultimate strain was calculated using the classical formula by Richart et al. Peak stress and strain were determined through statistical linear regression analysis using SPSS software, based on 252 experimental data points and involved using a combined factor of steel contribution (Elsfco) and FRP contribution (Elffco). Eight specimens were specifically used to validate the models through Finite Element Method (FEM) simulations. The accuracy of the predicted analysis results was also assessed by comparing them to existing models. The evaluation showed that the models successfully simulated the complete stress-strain curve of FRP-wrapped CFST columns under axial load, producing satisfactory results. These four models provide reliable results for calculating ultimate stress, ultimate strain, peak stress, peak strain, and the complete stress-strain behavior of these columns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2352-0124</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-0124</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>CFRP ; Circular CFST ; FEM ; GFRP ; Lateral confining stress ; Stress-strain curve</subject><ispartof>Structures (Oxford), 2024-09, Vol.67, p.107040, Article 107040</ispartof><rights>2024 Institution of Structural Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-4c7e8099ac2d92eaf573f237b486cd521fc7845e487fba2e8bf3d47fa8b3d2c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamed, Asmaa Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassanein, M.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasan, Mohamed Abdel-Shakour</creatorcontrib><title>Stress-strain modelling of circular concrete-filled FRP–steel composite tube columns under axial compression load</title><title>Structures (Oxford)</title><description>Concrete filled-circular steel tube (CFCST) columns, when externally confined with carbon or glass fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) sheets and subjected to axial load, exhibit improved strength and ductility compared to unconfined cases. The mechanical properties of the confinement materials are crucial in determining the stress-strain relationship of the confined concrete. This study presents an in-depth analysis of the stress-strain behavior of FRP-confined CFST columns, based on data from 252 specimens. It examines a range of factors, including various infill concrete grades from 14.15 to 140.39 MPa, two types of carbon steel outer tubes with yield strengths (fy) from 226 to 466.5 MPa, and two types of FRP (CFRP and GFRP) with tensile strengths from 1260 to 4900 MPa. The complete axial stress-strain curve is divided into four phases according to a mathematical expression by Wu and Wei (2015): the elastic phase, nonlinear transition phase, linear softening phase, and residual phase. New formulas for ultimate stress, based on confinement stress, were proposed by Hassanin et al. (2023), while the ultimate strain was calculated using the classical formula by Richart et al. Peak stress and strain were determined through statistical linear regression analysis using SPSS software, based on 252 experimental data points and involved using a combined factor of steel contribution (Elsfco) and FRP contribution (Elffco). Eight specimens were specifically used to validate the models through Finite Element Method (FEM) simulations. The accuracy of the predicted analysis results was also assessed by comparing them to existing models. The evaluation showed that the models successfully simulated the complete stress-strain curve of FRP-wrapped CFST columns under axial load, producing satisfactory results. These four models provide reliable results for calculating ultimate stress, ultimate strain, peak stress, peak strain, and the complete stress-strain behavior of these columns.</description><subject>CFRP</subject><subject>Circular CFST</subject><subject>FEM</subject><subject>GFRP</subject><subject>Lateral confining stress</subject><subject>Stress-strain curve</subject><issn>2352-0124</issn><issn>2352-0124</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWGrfwEVeYGqSyTTpRpBiVSgoXtYhk5xISjopSUZ05zv4hj6JU8aFK1fn9p__HD6EzimZU0IXF9u5zyX1Zs4I40NLEE6O0ITVDasIZfz4T36KZjlvCSGM8kEtJig_lQQ5V4OF9h3eRQsh-O4VR4eNT6YPOmETO5OgQOV8CGDx-vHh-_MrF4AwzHb7mH0BXPoWhjL0uy7jvrOQsH73epQcjvjY4RC1PUMnTocMs984RS_r6-fVbbW5v7lbXW0qQ2VTKm4ESLJcasPskoF2jagdq0XL5cLYhlFnhOQNcClcqxnI1tWWC6dlW1tmZD1FfPQ1KeacwKl98judPhQl6sBObdXITh3YqZHdsHY5rsHw25uHpLLx0BmwPoEpykb_v8EPoMt9zw</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Hamed, Asmaa Y.</creator><creator>Hassanein, M.F.</creator><creator>Hasan, Mohamed Abdel-Shakour</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Stress-strain modelling of circular concrete-filled FRP–steel composite tube columns under axial compression load</title><author>Hamed, Asmaa Y. ; Hassanein, M.F. ; Hasan, Mohamed Abdel-Shakour</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-4c7e8099ac2d92eaf573f237b486cd521fc7845e487fba2e8bf3d47fa8b3d2c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>CFRP</topic><topic>Circular CFST</topic><topic>FEM</topic><topic>GFRP</topic><topic>Lateral confining stress</topic><topic>Stress-strain curve</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamed, Asmaa Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassanein, M.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasan, Mohamed Abdel-Shakour</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Structures (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamed, Asmaa Y.</au><au>Hassanein, M.F.</au><au>Hasan, Mohamed Abdel-Shakour</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stress-strain modelling of circular concrete-filled FRP–steel composite tube columns under axial compression load</atitle><jtitle>Structures (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>67</volume><spage>107040</spage><pages>107040-</pages><artnum>107040</artnum><issn>2352-0124</issn><eissn>2352-0124</eissn><abstract>Concrete filled-circular steel tube (CFCST) columns, when externally confined with carbon or glass fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) sheets and subjected to axial load, exhibit improved strength and ductility compared to unconfined cases. The mechanical properties of the confinement materials are crucial in determining the stress-strain relationship of the confined concrete. This study presents an in-depth analysis of the stress-strain behavior of FRP-confined CFST columns, based on data from 252 specimens. It examines a range of factors, including various infill concrete grades from 14.15 to 140.39 MPa, two types of carbon steel outer tubes with yield strengths (fy) from 226 to 466.5 MPa, and two types of FRP (CFRP and GFRP) with tensile strengths from 1260 to 4900 MPa. The complete axial stress-strain curve is divided into four phases according to a mathematical expression by Wu and Wei (2015): the elastic phase, nonlinear transition phase, linear softening phase, and residual phase. New formulas for ultimate stress, based on confinement stress, were proposed by Hassanin et al. (2023), while the ultimate strain was calculated using the classical formula by Richart et al. Peak stress and strain were determined through statistical linear regression analysis using SPSS software, based on 252 experimental data points and involved using a combined factor of steel contribution (Elsfco) and FRP contribution (Elffco). Eight specimens were specifically used to validate the models through Finite Element Method (FEM) simulations. The accuracy of the predicted analysis results was also assessed by comparing them to existing models. The evaluation showed that the models successfully simulated the complete stress-strain curve of FRP-wrapped CFST columns under axial load, producing satisfactory results. These four models provide reliable results for calculating ultimate stress, ultimate strain, peak stress, peak strain, and the complete stress-strain behavior of these columns.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107040</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2352-0124
ispartof Structures (Oxford), 2024-09, Vol.67, p.107040, Article 107040
issn 2352-0124
2352-0124
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_istruc_2024_107040
source Elsevier
subjects CFRP
Circular CFST
FEM
GFRP
Lateral confining stress
Stress-strain curve
title Stress-strain modelling of circular concrete-filled FRP–steel composite tube columns under axial compression load
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A17%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stress-strain%20modelling%20of%20circular%20concrete-filled%20FRP%E2%80%93steel%20composite%20tube%20columns%20under%20axial%20compression%20load&rft.jtitle=Structures%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Hamed,%20Asmaa%20Y.&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=67&rft.spage=107040&rft.pages=107040-&rft.artnum=107040&rft.issn=2352-0124&rft.eissn=2352-0124&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107040&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES2352012424011925%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c185t-4c7e8099ac2d92eaf573f237b486cd521fc7845e487fba2e8bf3d47fa8b3d2c83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true