Loading…
Clinical impact of ≥ 50% reduction of low density lipoprotein cholesterol following lipid lowering therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome
•Relative < 50% LDL-C reduction is a predictor of higher ASCVD events in secondary prevention.•Relative ≥ 50% LDL-C reduction may be more effective, especially in patients with lower baseline LDL-C.•Individualized lipid management that considers relative LDL-C change and not solely target is reco...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical lipidology 2024-11 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Relative < 50% LDL-C reduction is a predictor of higher ASCVD events in secondary prevention.•Relative ≥ 50% LDL-C reduction may be more effective, especially in patients with lower baseline LDL-C.•Individualized lipid management that considers relative LDL-C change and not solely target is recommended to minimize additional ASCVD events.
Current guidelines advocate achieving a fixed LDL-C target and ≥ 50% reduction in LDL-C levels. However, sufficient LDL-C reduction is often not achieved even in patients achieving a fixed LDL-C target.
This study investigated the clinical impact of insufficient LDL-C reduction following lipid lowering therapy on cardiovascular outcomes acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.
A total of 561 consecutive ACS patients who had undergone PCI and LDL-C level measurement at index PCI and 12 months afterwards were evaluated retrospectively. we investigated a relationship between ≥ 50% LDL-C reduction and cardiovascular events including the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization and stent thrombosis.
Of the patients, 145 (25.8%) achieved ≥50% LDL-C reduction within 12 months. There were no significant differences in cardiovascular events between patients achieving the LDL-C target of 55 mg/dL and those not achieving it (23.6% vs. 19.3%, p=0.77), whereas the incidence of cardiovascular events was higher in the |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1933-2874 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jacl.2024.10.010 |