Loading…

Evaluating the feasibility of multitemporal hyperspectral remote sensing for monitoring bioremediation

•We evaluate multitemporal hyperspectral remote sensing for bioremediation.•We use a normalization procedure to compare red edge values of meadows over time.•The total accuracy of classifying all monitored locations was 65%.•The accuracy was 71% when only polluted locations were taken into account....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation 2015-02, Vol.34, p.217-225
Main Authors: Noomen, Marleen, Hakkarainen, Annika, van der Meijde, Mark, van der Werff, Harald
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•We evaluate multitemporal hyperspectral remote sensing for bioremediation.•We use a normalization procedure to compare red edge values of meadows over time.•The total accuracy of classifying all monitored locations was 65%.•The accuracy was 71% when only polluted locations were taken into account. In recent years, several studies focused on the detection of hydrocarbon pollution in the environment using hyperspectral remote sensing. Particularly the indirect detection of hydrocarbon pollution, using vegetation reflectance in the red edge region, has been studied extensively. Bioremediation is one of the methods that can be applied to clean up polluted sites. So far, there have been no studies on monitoring of bioremediation using (hyperspectral) remote sensing. This study evaluates the feasibility of hyperspectral remote sensing for monitoring the effect of bioremediation over time. Benzene leakage at connection points along a pipeline was monitored by comparing the red edge position (REP) in 2005 and 2008 using HyMap airborne hyperspectral images. REP values were normalized in order to enhance local variations caused by a change in benzene concentrations. 11 out of 17 locations were classified correctly as remediated, still polluted, or still clean, with a total accuracy of 65%. When only polluted locations that were remediated were taken into account, the (user's) accuracy was 71%.
ISSN:1569-8432
1872-826X
DOI:10.1016/j.jag.2014.08.016