Using amplitude variation with offset and normalized residual polarization analysis of ground penetrating radar data to differentiate an NAPL release from stratigraphic changes

Amplitude variation with offset analysis of ground penetrating radar data (AVO/GPR) may improve the differentiation of nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) from stratigraphic changes. Previous controlled experiments have shown that common offset (CO) GPR methods can detect the presence of NAPL in soil by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied geophysics 2004-05, Vol.56 (1), p.41-58
Main Authors: Jordan, Thomas E., Baker, Gregory S., Henn, Keith, Messier, Jean-Pierre
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Applied geophysics
AVO
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Internal geophysics
NAPL
NRP
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Amplitude variation with offset analysis of ground penetrating radar data (AVO/GPR) may improve the differentiation of nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) from stratigraphic changes. Previous controlled experiments have shown that common offset (CO) GPR methods can detect the presence of NAPL in soil by examining amplitude and travel time (velocity) anomalies. Unfortunately, stratigraphic changes such as the presence of a silt or clay lens or perched water table may produce similar amplitude and velocity anomalies. Therefore, it is difficult to delineate NAPL in a terrain with unknown stratigraphy exclusively using CO data collection methods. Forward models based on the Fresnel equations predict that amplitude responses exist at various incidence angles that will allow for differentiating NAPL from hydrogeologic changes. Models generated as part of this study indicate that analyzing the difference in amplitude responses from linearly polarized electric field vertically oriented ( EV) to the horizontally oriented ( EH) signals at various incidence angles improves target discrimination. A case history is presented demonstrating that collecting common-midpoint (CMP) GPR data using EH and EV polarized signals at anomalous CO amplitude responses and analyzing the data using AVO and normalized residual polarization (NRP) methods may improve the detection and differentiation of NAPL from stratigraphic changes in the subsurface. These results are corroborated using a capacitively coupled resistivity instrument and subsequent intrusive sampling.
ISSN:0926-9851
1879-1859
DOI:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2004.03.002