Including edge preserving smoothing filter within blocky- constrained, target-oriented AVA inversions

• Published in: Journal of applied geophysics 2019-10, Vol.169, p.15-28
• Main Author: Aleardi, Mattia
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: AVA inversion; Blocky constraints; Seismic inversion
• ISSN: 0926-9851; 1879-1859
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.06.015

Resolving thin layers and achieve focused layer boundaries is one of the major challenges in seismic inversion. This translates into recovering a blocky solution with sparse spatial derivatives of model parameters. Here, we present two iterative focusing regularization techniques for target-oriented Amplitude Versus Angle (AVA) inversion. Target-oriented means that only the AVA responses of the reflections of interest are inverted for the simultaneous estimation of P-wave, S-wave and density reflectivities. The first approach imposes Cauchy constraints on the spatial model derivatives whereas, the second is inspired by the minimum gradient support regularization. Both the implemented algorithms enhance their focusing and edge-preserving abilities by exploiting an Edge Preserving Smoothing (EPS) filter that is used to compute both the model constraints and the model update. We include a-priori model information into the inversion kernel to guide the convergence of the algorithms toward physically plausible solutions. The two approaches are compared against the standard Bayesian inversion that simply considers Gaussian distributed model parameters, and with the well-known edge-preserving method that assumes Cauchy-distributed derivative of model parameters. For the lack of available field seismic data, we limit the attention to synthetic inversion experiments in which we simulate different signal-to noise (S/N) ratios. The inversion tests prove the suitability of the two proposed approaches for target-oriented AVA inversion and demonstrate their focusing and anti-noise abilities. In particular, the two implemented algorithms outperform the standard Bayesian inversion and the Cauchy approach in cases of low S/N ratios. The two implemented methods are also extremely flexible and can be applied to other linear or non-linear geophysical inverse problems. •Implementing a target-oriented AVA inversion algorithm.•Including blocky constraints into the inversion kernel.•Comparing the predictions of the implemented approaches with those of a standard Bayesian and Cauchy inversion.