Loading…
Evaluation of dust extinction and vertical profiles simulated by WRF-Chem with CALIPSO and AERONET over North Africa
In this study, the Weather Research and Forecasting model with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) is applied to compare the simulated dust content and extinction coefficients from the Goddard Chemistry Aerosol Radiation and Transport (GOCART), the Air Force Weather Agency (AFWA) and University of Cologne (UoC) du...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of atmospheric and solar-terrestrial physics 2020-03, Vol.199, p.105213, Article 105213 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In this study, the Weather Research and Forecasting model with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) is applied to compare the simulated dust content and extinction coefficients from the Goddard Chemistry Aerosol Radiation and Transport (GOCART), the Air Force Weather Agency (AFWA) and University of Cologne (UoC) dust emission scheme available in WRF-Chem. The observations made by the AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) and Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) are used to assess the model performance during the summer of 2006 over northern Africa. The results highlight that all the three schemes reproduce broadly the observed spatiotemporal distribution of dust content and extinction profile over northern Africa. However, differences exist in extent and intensity between the three emissions schemes and observations. All the three dust emission schemes reproduce the daily variation of the major dust events observed from the AERONET stations over northern Africa but failed to capture correctly the spatial distribution of the maximum zones of observed dust content by CALIOP. It is found that the simulated dust extinction profiles overestimate broadly the observation from CALIPSO in terms of vertical extent and magnitude over northern Africa. Our results reveal significant differences between the three schemes (GOCART, AFWA, and UoC). These differences between the schemes could be related to the calculation of the threshold wind speed in each scheme, which indicating the necessity to continue improving these dust emission schemes in the WRF-Chem model to better reduce uncertainties in the representation of dust plumes.
•The GOCART, AFWA and UoC scheme reproduce broadly the observed AOD and extinction coefficient over northern Africa;•There are significant differences between the three schemes (GOCART, AFWA and UoC) results over the Sahara and Sahel regions;•The simulated dust extinction profiles overestimate largely the observation from CALIPSO over northern Africa. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1364-6826 1879-1824 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105213 |