Bioprosthetic Valve Leaflet Displacement During Valve-in-Valve Intervention

• Published in: JACC. Cardiovascular interventions 2020-03, Vol.13 (6), p.667-678
• Main Authors: Hensey, Mark, Sellers, Stephanie, Sathananthan, Janarthanan, Lai, Althea, Landes, Uri, Alkhodair, Abdullah, McManus, Bruce, Cheung, Anson, Wood, David, Blanke, Philipp, Leipsic, Jonathon, Ye, Jian, Webb, John
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: coronary obstruction; TAVR; valve-in-valve
• ISSN: 1936-8798; 1876-7605
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.10.021

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of different transcatheter heart valves (THVs) on valve leaflet displacement when deployed within bioprosthetic surgical valves and, thereby, risk for coronary obstruction. Coronary obstruction is a potentially devastating complication during valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Strategies such as provisional stenting and intentional bioprosthetic valve leaflet laceration have been developed to mitigate this risk. Alternatively, the use of a THV that retracts the bioprosthetic leaflet away from the coronary ostium may prevent coronary obstruction. A 25-mm J-Valve, a 26-mm Evolut Pro, and a 23-mm JenaValve were implanted into both a 25-mm Trifecta surgical valve and a 25-mm Mitroflow surgical valve. A 23-mm and a 26-mm SAPIEN 3 were deployed into the Trifecta and Mitroflow, respectively. Displacement of the surgical valve leaflets (retraction vs. expansion) was measured with implantation of each THV by measuring displacement angle and maximal displacement distance. Within both the Trifecta and Mitroflow valves, implantation of the J-Valve and JenaValve resulted in retraction of the surgical valve leaflets, and placement of the Evolut Pro and SAPIEN 3 resulted in tubular expansion of the surgical valve leaflets. There were significant differences in displacement angles and distances between both the J-Valve and JenaValve and the SAPIEN 3 and Evolut Pro (p