Loading…

Mitigation of ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from stored cattle slurry using acidifiers and chemical amendments

Cattle and cow slurry storage is a significant source of agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia (NH3) emissions. While acidification has been demonstrated to significantly reduce these emissions, a knowledge gap exists to identify a range of chemical amendments that are safe, suitable and cos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cleaner production 2019-11, Vol.237, p.117822, Article 117822
Main Authors: Kavanagh, I., Burchill, W., Healy, M.G., Fenton, O., Krol, D.J., Lanigan, G.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b4ee3a96065e7258f178352ab09bad33ecc5f292f97d6bcbe334ea02e597d83e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b4ee3a96065e7258f178352ab09bad33ecc5f292f97d6bcbe334ea02e597d83e3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 117822
container_title Journal of cleaner production
container_volume 237
creator Kavanagh, I.
Burchill, W.
Healy, M.G.
Fenton, O.
Krol, D.J.
Lanigan, G.J.
description Cattle and cow slurry storage is a significant source of agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia (NH3) emissions. While acidification has been demonstrated to significantly reduce these emissions, a knowledge gap exists to identify a range of chemical amendments that are safe, suitable and cost effective to mitigate both GHG and NH3 gases simultaneously. The current study showed that ferric chloride, sulphuric acid, alum and acetic acid were extremely effective at abating emissions, with NH3 reduced by 96%, 85%, 82% and 73%, respectively. In terms of methane (CH4), ferric chloride, alum, sulphuric acid and acetic acid reduced emissions by 98%, 96%, 95% and 94%, respectively. Previous studies have found that the reduction of >pH 6 can inhibit the release of these gases; however, the effectiveness can vary depending on each amendment's composition. The cost benefit analysis, assessed the amendments in terms of both gaseous emissions reduction and net cost. Sulphuric acid, acetic acid, ferric chloride and alum ranked best, respectively. Currently, the cost of implementing these amendments is, at best, cost neutral. Therefore, incentivising chemical amendments for the abatement of GHG and NH3 gases from slurry storage is needed. This incubation experiment is an effective means of pre-screening amendments before they are explored at pilot or full scale with subsequent field application. Future research should consider the assessment of cheaper on- and off-farm alternative waste streams as slurry amendment. [Display omitted] •Acidification of cattle and dairy slurry was investigated.•Target pH of 5.5 resulted in a 96% reduction in NH3 and 98% reduction in CH4.•Ferric chloride reductions were independent of pH value.•Cost analysis revealed financial incentives are needed for scaled implementation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117822
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_117822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0959652619326824</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0959652619326824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b4ee3a96065e7258f178352ab09bad33ecc5f292f97d6bcbe334ea02e597d83e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtqwzAQRUVpoWnaTyjoB-zqEdnRqpTQF6R0066FLI0dGdsKklzI31dpsu9iGGaYe5l7ELqnpKSEVg992ZsB9sGXjFBZUlqvGbtAC7quZZGH6hItiBSyqASrrtFNjD0htCb1aoHmD5dcp5PzE_Yt1uPoJ6exnizuAsC083ME3OmIYXQx5rOI2-BHHJMPYLHRKQ2A4zCHcMBzdFOHtXHWtQ5C_PMxuyw1esjmMNlcKd6iq1YPEe7OfYm-X56_Nm_F9vP1ffO0LQyXPBXNCoBrWZFKQM3Eus1huGC6IbLRlnMwRrRMslbWtmpMA5yvQBMGIi_WHPgSiZOvCT7GAK3aBzfqcFCUqCM71aszO3Vkp07ssu7xpIP83E9OoqJxMBmwLoBJynr3j8MviFF-Lw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mitigation of ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from stored cattle slurry using acidifiers and chemical amendments</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Kavanagh, I. ; Burchill, W. ; Healy, M.G. ; Fenton, O. ; Krol, D.J. ; Lanigan, G.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, I. ; Burchill, W. ; Healy, M.G. ; Fenton, O. ; Krol, D.J. ; Lanigan, G.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Cattle and cow slurry storage is a significant source of agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia (NH3) emissions. While acidification has been demonstrated to significantly reduce these emissions, a knowledge gap exists to identify a range of chemical amendments that are safe, suitable and cost effective to mitigate both GHG and NH3 gases simultaneously. The current study showed that ferric chloride, sulphuric acid, alum and acetic acid were extremely effective at abating emissions, with NH3 reduced by 96%, 85%, 82% and 73%, respectively. In terms of methane (CH4), ferric chloride, alum, sulphuric acid and acetic acid reduced emissions by 98%, 96%, 95% and 94%, respectively. Previous studies have found that the reduction of &gt;pH 6 can inhibit the release of these gases; however, the effectiveness can vary depending on each amendment's composition. The cost benefit analysis, assessed the amendments in terms of both gaseous emissions reduction and net cost. Sulphuric acid, acetic acid, ferric chloride and alum ranked best, respectively. Currently, the cost of implementing these amendments is, at best, cost neutral. Therefore, incentivising chemical amendments for the abatement of GHG and NH3 gases from slurry storage is needed. This incubation experiment is an effective means of pre-screening amendments before they are explored at pilot or full scale with subsequent field application. Future research should consider the assessment of cheaper on- and off-farm alternative waste streams as slurry amendment. [Display omitted] •Acidification of cattle and dairy slurry was investigated.•Target pH of 5.5 resulted in a 96% reduction in NH3 and 98% reduction in CH4.•Ferric chloride reductions were independent of pH value.•Cost analysis revealed financial incentives are needed for scaled implementation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-6526</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1786</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acidification ; Ammonia ; Chemical amendment ; Greenhouse gases cost-benefit analysis ; Slurry ; Storage</subject><ispartof>Journal of cleaner production, 2019-11, Vol.237, p.117822, Article 117822</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b4ee3a96065e7258f178352ab09bad33ecc5f292f97d6bcbe334ea02e597d83e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b4ee3a96065e7258f178352ab09bad33ecc5f292f97d6bcbe334ea02e597d83e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burchill, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenton, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krol, D.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanigan, G.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Mitigation of ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from stored cattle slurry using acidifiers and chemical amendments</title><title>Journal of cleaner production</title><description>Cattle and cow slurry storage is a significant source of agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia (NH3) emissions. While acidification has been demonstrated to significantly reduce these emissions, a knowledge gap exists to identify a range of chemical amendments that are safe, suitable and cost effective to mitigate both GHG and NH3 gases simultaneously. The current study showed that ferric chloride, sulphuric acid, alum and acetic acid were extremely effective at abating emissions, with NH3 reduced by 96%, 85%, 82% and 73%, respectively. In terms of methane (CH4), ferric chloride, alum, sulphuric acid and acetic acid reduced emissions by 98%, 96%, 95% and 94%, respectively. Previous studies have found that the reduction of &gt;pH 6 can inhibit the release of these gases; however, the effectiveness can vary depending on each amendment's composition. The cost benefit analysis, assessed the amendments in terms of both gaseous emissions reduction and net cost. Sulphuric acid, acetic acid, ferric chloride and alum ranked best, respectively. Currently, the cost of implementing these amendments is, at best, cost neutral. Therefore, incentivising chemical amendments for the abatement of GHG and NH3 gases from slurry storage is needed. This incubation experiment is an effective means of pre-screening amendments before they are explored at pilot or full scale with subsequent field application. Future research should consider the assessment of cheaper on- and off-farm alternative waste streams as slurry amendment. [Display omitted] •Acidification of cattle and dairy slurry was investigated.•Target pH of 5.5 resulted in a 96% reduction in NH3 and 98% reduction in CH4.•Ferric chloride reductions were independent of pH value.•Cost analysis revealed financial incentives are needed for scaled implementation.</description><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Chemical amendment</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases cost-benefit analysis</subject><subject>Slurry</subject><subject>Storage</subject><issn>0959-6526</issn><issn>1879-1786</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtqwzAQRUVpoWnaTyjoB-zqEdnRqpTQF6R0066FLI0dGdsKklzI31dpsu9iGGaYe5l7ELqnpKSEVg992ZsB9sGXjFBZUlqvGbtAC7quZZGH6hItiBSyqASrrtFNjD0htCb1aoHmD5dcp5PzE_Yt1uPoJ6exnizuAsC083ME3OmIYXQx5rOI2-BHHJMPYLHRKQ2A4zCHcMBzdFOHtXHWtQ5C_PMxuyw1esjmMNlcKd6iq1YPEe7OfYm-X56_Nm_F9vP1ffO0LQyXPBXNCoBrWZFKQM3Eus1huGC6IbLRlnMwRrRMslbWtmpMA5yvQBMGIi_WHPgSiZOvCT7GAK3aBzfqcFCUqCM71aszO3Vkp07ssu7xpIP83E9OoqJxMBmwLoBJynr3j8MviFF-Lw</recordid><startdate>20191110</startdate><enddate>20191110</enddate><creator>Kavanagh, I.</creator><creator>Burchill, W.</creator><creator>Healy, M.G.</creator><creator>Fenton, O.</creator><creator>Krol, D.J.</creator><creator>Lanigan, G.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191110</creationdate><title>Mitigation of ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from stored cattle slurry using acidifiers and chemical amendments</title><author>Kavanagh, I. ; Burchill, W. ; Healy, M.G. ; Fenton, O. ; Krol, D.J. ; Lanigan, G.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b4ee3a96065e7258f178352ab09bad33ecc5f292f97d6bcbe334ea02e597d83e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Chemical amendment</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases cost-benefit analysis</topic><topic>Slurry</topic><topic>Storage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burchill, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, M.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fenton, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krol, D.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanigan, G.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kavanagh, I.</au><au>Burchill, W.</au><au>Healy, M.G.</au><au>Fenton, O.</au><au>Krol, D.J.</au><au>Lanigan, G.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mitigation of ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from stored cattle slurry using acidifiers and chemical amendments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cleaner production</jtitle><date>2019-11-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>237</volume><spage>117822</spage><pages>117822-</pages><artnum>117822</artnum><issn>0959-6526</issn><eissn>1879-1786</eissn><abstract>Cattle and cow slurry storage is a significant source of agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia (NH3) emissions. While acidification has been demonstrated to significantly reduce these emissions, a knowledge gap exists to identify a range of chemical amendments that are safe, suitable and cost effective to mitigate both GHG and NH3 gases simultaneously. The current study showed that ferric chloride, sulphuric acid, alum and acetic acid were extremely effective at abating emissions, with NH3 reduced by 96%, 85%, 82% and 73%, respectively. In terms of methane (CH4), ferric chloride, alum, sulphuric acid and acetic acid reduced emissions by 98%, 96%, 95% and 94%, respectively. Previous studies have found that the reduction of &gt;pH 6 can inhibit the release of these gases; however, the effectiveness can vary depending on each amendment's composition. The cost benefit analysis, assessed the amendments in terms of both gaseous emissions reduction and net cost. Sulphuric acid, acetic acid, ferric chloride and alum ranked best, respectively. Currently, the cost of implementing these amendments is, at best, cost neutral. Therefore, incentivising chemical amendments for the abatement of GHG and NH3 gases from slurry storage is needed. This incubation experiment is an effective means of pre-screening amendments before they are explored at pilot or full scale with subsequent field application. Future research should consider the assessment of cheaper on- and off-farm alternative waste streams as slurry amendment. [Display omitted] •Acidification of cattle and dairy slurry was investigated.•Target pH of 5.5 resulted in a 96% reduction in NH3 and 98% reduction in CH4.•Ferric chloride reductions were independent of pH value.•Cost analysis revealed financial incentives are needed for scaled implementation.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117822</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-6526
ispartof Journal of cleaner production, 2019-11, Vol.237, p.117822, Article 117822
issn 0959-6526
1879-1786
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2019_117822
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Acidification
Ammonia
Chemical amendment
Greenhouse gases cost-benefit analysis
Slurry
Storage
title Mitigation of ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from stored cattle slurry using acidifiers and chemical amendments
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A36%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mitigation%20of%20ammonia%20and%20greenhouse%20gas%20emissions%20from%20stored%20cattle%20slurry%20using%20acidifiers%20and%20chemical%20amendments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cleaner%20production&rft.au=Kavanagh,%20I.&rft.date=2019-11-10&rft.volume=237&rft.spage=117822&rft.pages=117822-&rft.artnum=117822&rft.issn=0959-6526&rft.eissn=1879-1786&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117822&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES0959652619326824%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-b4ee3a96065e7258f178352ab09bad33ecc5f292f97d6bcbe334ea02e597d83e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true